DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Agoran Arms
Grey Knight wrote: >The coat of arms of Agora is defined by the following blazon: Nice. I was just thinking about proposing a rule specifying symbols of the game. I noticed that the rule specifying that the name of the game is "Agora" has gone, and I thought it ought to come back. But if it does, then why not generalise the concept? In addition to a name I thought the rules could also specify a flag, an anthem, a motto, and so on. A coat of arms is a good one to have too. -zefram
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Agoran Arms
On 1/11/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Grey Knight wrote: >The coat of arms of Agora is defined by the following blazon: Nice. I was just thinking about proposing a rule specifying symbols of the game. I noticed that the rule specifying that the name of the game is "Agora" has gone, and I thought it ought to come back. But if it does, then why not generalise the concept? In addition to a name I thought the rules could also specify a flag, an anthem, a motto, and so on. A coat of arms is a good one to have too. -zefram I feel things of this nature might be changeable upon a win, popular vote, or some other period of time. Would allow for some theming or strange fun.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Agoran Arms
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Zefram wrote: Grey Knight wrote: The coat of arms of Agora is defined by the following blazon: Nice. I was just thinking about proposing a rule specifying symbols of the game. I noticed that the rule specifying that the name of the game is "Agora" has gone, and I thought it ought to come back. But if it does, then why not generalise the concept? In addition to a name I thought the rules could also specify a flag, an anthem, a motto, and so on. A coat of arms is a good one to have too. -zefram I argued against the repeal of R1020. I lost. - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Agoran Arms
Benjamin Schultz wrote: >I argued against the repeal of R1020. I lost. Taking a sentence from Rule 105: # If the title is not specified, the Rulekeepor may select any title e # sees fit. it appears that the title of the game, being no longer specified, is up to the Rulekeepor's discretion. -zefram
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Agoran Arms
On 1/12/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: it appears that the title of the game, being no longer specified, is up to the Rulekeepor's discretion. Archduke Agora never had a title before -- it had a name. And the name ought to be up to the parent... "I see no reason to let this get bogged down; there are no precedents or rules that cover this situation, so I think we may as well begin directly Proposals for new rules are invited. In accordance with the rules, these will be published, numbered and distributed by me at my earliest convenience." which First Speaker Michael Norrish seems to be. So the name really should be up to Michael Norrish's discretion. What? You say e's the Rulekeepor too? -- C. Maud Image (Michael Slone)
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Agoran Arms
Zefram wrote: Benjamin Schultz wrote: I argued against the repeal of R1020. I lost. Taking a sentence from Rule 105: # If the title is not specified, the Rulekeepor may select any title e # sees fit. it appears that the title of the game, being no longer specified, is up to the Rulekeepor's discretion. Woot. I can give the game the title "Yoyo" again. Michael.
