Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Joshua Boehme wrote: A player who has deregistered in a Writ of FAGE may not register within ninety days of eir deregistration, other rules to the contrary notwithstanding. Why make it different than 30-days due to normal deregistration? Facing this, I'd personally just write an equally pissed-off letter followed by this is not a Cantus Cygnus, I deregister. The point of Writ of FAGE is to give a colorful outlet and thus perhaps defuse the tension, it shouldn't be punished. -G.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why make it different than 30-days due to normal deregistration? Facing this, I'd personally just write an equally pissed-off letter followed by this is not a Cantus Cygnus, I deregister. The point of Writ of FAGE is to give a colorful outlet and thus perhaps defuse the tension, it shouldn't be punished. -G. It's not punishment. It's to ensure that you *really* want to leave. Perhaps we should do 15 and 30 instead of 30 and 90? -- Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you. -- Unknown
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:21:06 -0800 Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why make it different than 30-days due to normal deregistration? Facing this, I'd personally just write an equally pissed-off letter followed by this is not a Cantus Cygnus, I deregister. The point of Writ of FAGE is to give a colorful outlet and thus perhaps defuse the tension, it shouldn't be punished. -G. It's not punishment. It's to ensure that you *really* want to leave. Perhaps we should do 15 and 30 instead of 30 and 90? Indeed. It is rather anti-climactic for someone to make a grand exit, only to return soon thereafter. -- Elysion
DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A player who has deregistered in a Writ of FAGE may not register within thirty days of eir deregistration, other rules to the contrary notwithstanding. Make it ninety. -- Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you. -- Unknown
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A player who has deregistered in a Writ of FAGE may not register within thirty days of eir deregistration, other rules to the contrary notwithstanding. Make it ninety. I'd vote for ninety, although arguably it is not possible to deregister in a Writ of FAGE unless one is the Registrar.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Monday 17 November 2008 07:55:00 pm comex wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A player who has deregistered in a Writ of FAGE may not register within thirty days of eir deregistration, other rules to the contrary notwithstanding. Make it ninety. I'd vote for ninety, although arguably it is not possible to deregister in a Writ of FAGE unless one is the Registrar. who has been deregistered in a Writ of FAGE.
