DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Initialize Activity

2007-02-22 Thread Quazie

Is anyone else defiantly inactive?

On 2/22/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Proposal:  Initialize Activity

Upon the adoption of this proposal, all players become active.





--
Brandon Kwaselow (Quazie)

University of Michigan LSA, Residential College
   Computer Science


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Initialize Activity

2007-02-22 Thread Ed Murphy

Quazie wrote:


Is anyone else defiantly inactive?

 ^
Is this typo intentional or merely serendipitous?

Anyway, some players may reasonably fit the English definition of
inactive.  There are five things that depend on activity:

  1) Requirement to receive PFs
  2) Ability to win
  3) Ability to become holder of an Office by Agoran Consent
  4) Ability to vote
  5) Eligibility to judge

Prior to the adoption of Proposal 4893, at least #2 through #4 were
non-issues, because any player doing these things would become active
when e attempted the actions (consenting to hold office for #3).



Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Initialize Activity

2007-02-22 Thread Manuel Lanctot

On 2/22/07, Quazie wrote:

Is anyone else defiantly inactive?


I hear you.

~Manu