DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolutiion of Proposals 8058-8065, quorum-busting edition
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:45 -0400, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Well, if the resolution message actually is self-ratifying, I see no reason > why the following shouldn't work, assuming this message actually is received > by a "reasonable number" of people. (So please confirm receipt!) I received this. -- ais523
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolutiion of Proposals 8058-8065, quorum-busting edition
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Well, if the resolution message actually is self-ratifying, I see no reason > why the following shouldn't work, assuming this message actually is received > by a "reasonable number" of people. (So please confirm receipt!) Received. [OFF seems to be the stable one right now]
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolutiion of Proposals 8058-8065, quorum-busting edition
twg wrote: Well, if the resolution message actually is self-ratifying, I see no reason why the following shouldn't work, assuming this message actually is received by a "reasonable number" of people. (So please confirm receipt!) Receipt confirmed
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolutiion of Proposals 8058-8065, quorum-busting edition
As have I. On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:48 PM Alex Smith wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:45 -0400, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > Well, if the resolution message actually is self-ratifying, I see no reason > > why the following shouldn't work, assuming this message actually is received > > by a "reasonable number" of people. (So please confirm receipt!) > > I received this. > > -- > ais523
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolutiion of Proposals 8058-8065, quorum-busting edition
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: Received. [OFF seems to be the stable one right now] Also received. And I also received (at least some of?) the BUS: messages you seem to have problems with. Greetings, Ørjan.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolutiion of Proposals 8058-8065, quorum-busting edition
got it On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:23 AM, Edward Murphy wrote: > twg wrote: > >> Well, if the resolution message actually is self-ratifying, I see no >> reason >> why the following shouldn't work, assuming this message actually is >> received >> by a "reasonable number" of people. (So please confirm receipt!) > > > Receipt confirmed > -- >From V.J. Rada