Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolving proposals 7859-7864
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > > This rule last > > appeared in the FLR here [1] and was repealed by proposal 7629, > > distributed here [2]. I'd give you the date it was assessed, but I > > can't find the assessment, even after much searching. I could be in > > error, or it could be that the proposal only took effect because of > > the ratification of the SLR (which I think was published on the > > supposed date of its assessment)? I would appreciate some help in > > understanding this, as it's really freaking me out. > > Assessment was sent to business, not official, and had a misleading > subject line and was adopted out-of-order: > > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2014-April/032776.html Oh, for completeness, the SLR published two hours after that assessment (and containing the 7629 changes) was ratified on 1-May-14 by proposal 7638 with the following text: > Ratify the body of the message published on 2014-04-07 titled "OFF: > [Rulekeepor] Short Logical Ruleset". > > [Last one was about 8 months ago.] So that's just coincidence.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolving proposals 7859-7864
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > This rule last > appeared in the FLR here [1] and was repealed by proposal 7629, > distributed here [2]. I'd give you the date it was assessed, but I > can't find the assessment, even after much searching. I could be in > error, or it could be that the proposal only took effect because of > the ratification of the SLR (which I think was published on the > supposed date of its assessment)? I would appreciate some help in > understanding this, as it's really freaking me out. Assessment was sent to business, not official, and had a misleading subject line and was adopted out-of-order: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2014-April/032776.html
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolving proposals 7859-7864
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > >> On Jun 26, 2017, at 6:34 PM, Quazie wrote: >> >> >> I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7864, 7859, 7860, 7861, 7862, >> and 7863 as below. >> >> >> >> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the >> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to >> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!). If a >> decision's voting period is still ongoing, I end it immediately >> before resolving it and after resolving the previous decision.] >> >> ID Author(s) AI Title >> >> *7864 Aris3.0 Assets v7 > > Aris: do you have the history of this rule handy? As it is a reenaction, I > believe I am required to list the history of this rule prior to its appeal. I dug it up for you. While I like the idea of reenactment, it might be more fair to make the proposal's author dig up the last version of the FLR it appeared in and the proposal that repealed it. This rule last appeared in the FLR here [1] and was repealed by proposal 7629, distributed here [2]. I'd give you the date it was assessed, but I can't find the assessment, even after much searching. I could be in error, or it could be that the proposal only took effect because of the ratification of the SLR (which I think was published on the supposed date of its assessment)? I would appreciate some help in understanding this, as it's really freaking me out. In any case, the date given in the current FLR is "Proposal 7629 (scshunt), 7 April 2014". [1] https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2014-February/010621.html [2] https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2014-March/010655.html -Aris
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolving proposals 7859-7864
Could you clarify this message? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jun 26, 2017, at 8:48 PM, Quazie wrote: > > I am sorry for formating I properly. I'll confronted to the ruleset next > time. > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 20:41 Gaelan Steele wrote: > > > On Jun 26, 2017, at 6:34 PM, Quazie wrote: > > > > > > I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7864, 7859, 7860, 7861, > > 7862, and 7863 as below. > > > > > > > > [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the > > following proposals. For each decision, the options available to > > Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!). If a > > decision's voting period is still ongoing, I end it immediately > > before resolving it and after resolving the previous decision.] > > > > ID Author(s) AI Title > > > > *7864 Aris3.0 Assets v7 > > Aris: do you have the history of this rule handy? As it is a reenaction, I > believe I am required to list the history of this rule prior to its appeal. > > > *7859 Quazie 1.7 Gentle Judicial Updates > > I intend to, without Objection, cause “Cleanup Time” to replace “1 -“ with > “1.” and so on in the rule “Recusal.” > > > *7860 Quazie 1.7 Cards are power 1.7 > > x7861 Quazie 3.0 Trivia(l) > > *7862 Quazie 1.7 Betterer Pledges > > x7863 Quazie 1.2 Why should outsiders be able to Object? > > Gaelan signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolving proposals 7859-7864
I am sorry for formating I properly. I'll confronted to the ruleset next time. On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 20:41 Gaelan Steele wrote: > > > On Jun 26, 2017, at 6:34 PM, Quazie wrote: > > > > > > I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7864, 7859, 7860, 7861, > 7862, and 7863 as below. > > > > > > > > [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the > > following proposals. For each decision, the options available to > > Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!). If a > > decision's voting period is still ongoing, I end it immediately > > before resolving it and after resolving the previous decision.] > > > > ID Author(s) AI Title > > > > *7864 Aris3.0 Assets v7 > > Aris: do you have the history of this rule handy? As it is a reenaction, I > believe I am required to list the history of this rule prior to its appeal. > > > *7859 Quazie 1.7 Gentle Judicial Updates > > I intend to, without Objection, cause “Cleanup Time” to replace “1 -“ with > “1.” and so on in the rule “Recusal.” > > > *7860 Quazie 1.7 Cards are power 1.7 > > x7861 Quazie 3.0 Trivia(l) > > *7862 Quazie 1.7 Betterer Pledges > > x7863 Quazie 1.2 Why should outsiders be able to Object? > > Gaelan
