DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6461-6473

2009-09-03 Thread Roger Hicks
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:16, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
 6467 D 0 2.0 BobTHJ              Fix Hand Limit Defaults
 AGAINST

Is there a reason why people are voting against this? it was a simple fix.

BobTHJ


DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6461-6473

2009-08-31 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote:

 6466 O 0 1.0 coppro  Chaos Cleanup
 FOR x 8

Your voting limit is 5.


DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6461-6473

2009-08-31 Thread Ed Murphy
Pavitra wrote:

 Sean Hunt wrote:
 6473 O 0 1.0 coppro  That Was Easy
 FOR x 8
 I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
 
 AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).

I have it at 2.



DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6461-6473

2009-08-31 Thread comex
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
 comex wrote:
 6473 O 0 1.0 coppro              That Was Easy
 ISELL(30zm - AGAINST)
 I fill this offer/purchase it/make comex vote FOR on that proposal.

(This caused me to retract my AGAINST vote and vote FOR.)

-- 
-c.


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6461-6473

2009-08-31 Thread Pavitra
Ed Murphy wrote:
 Pavitra wrote:
 
 Sean Hunt wrote:
 6473 O 0 1.0 coppro  That Was Easy
 FOR x 8
 I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
 
 AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
 
 I have it at 2.
 
I was recently demoted to Epsilon.


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6461-6473

2009-08-31 Thread Sean Hunt
Pavitra wrote:
 Ed Murphy wrote:
 Pavitra wrote:

 Sean Hunt wrote:
 6473 O 0 1.0 coppro  That Was Easy
 FOR x 8
 I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
 AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
 I have it at 2.

 I was recently demoted to Epsilon.
That was after the distribution.


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6461-6473

2009-08-31 Thread Ed Murphy
Pavitra wrote:

 Ed Murphy wrote:
 Pavitra wrote:

 Sean Hunt wrote:
 6473 O 0 1.0 coppro  That Was Easy
 FOR x 8
 I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
 AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
 I have it at 2.

 I was recently demoted to Epsilon.

Voting limits are fixed at the start of the voting period, and the
recent caste changes occurred afterward.


DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6461-6473

2009-08-31 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/9/1 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
 Sean Hunt wrote:
 6463 D 1 2.0 C-walker            More Criminal Sentences v2
 PRESENT; not enough guidance as to when sentences should be used for a
 ISELL(25 zm)

 -coppro


Eh?