DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7548-7564
On 5 Aug 2013, at 04:30, woggle wrote: >> 7553 3 20 O omd Remove useless vote protection > If G. casts a vote on this proposal, ENDORSE G. x my voting limit on it; > otherwise, AGAINST x my voting limit on it. G.'s vote was cast by me on this proposal, using the Summer Votes promise, and I endorsed omd, so this might not have the effect you desire.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7548-7564
CURSE YOU GMAIL On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 00:04 -0400, Max Schutz wrote: > > on 7564 Present > > 7563 FOR > > 7561 AGAINST > > and if i am doing this wrong please let me know > > You sent your votes to agora-discussion; you need to send them to > agora-business for them to count. Apart from that, you're doing it > right. > > -- > ais523 > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7548-7564
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 00:04 -0400, Max Schutz wrote: > on 7564 Present > 7563 FOR > 7561 AGAINST > and if i am doing this wrong please let me know You sent your votes to agora-discussion; you need to send them to agora-business for them to count. Apart from that, you're doing it right. -- ais523
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7548-7564
on 7564 Present 7563 FOR 7561 AGAINST and if i am doing this wrong please let me know On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 23:02 -0400, omd wrote: > > NUM AI PF C AUTHOR TITLE > I vote as follows: > > 7548 10 O Ienpw IIIStandardized election days > AGAINST, time periods measured in months are poorly defined > > 7549 2 25 O Walker Recruitment Sanity > PRESENT, I don't see what this fixes > > 7550 30 O omd Democratic Democracy Only > AGAINST, mostly because it makes democratization harder and omd > submitted it > > 7551 20 O omd Ministry fix and buff > FOR > > 7552 20 O omd Freshdated > FOR > > 7553 3 20 O omd Remove useless vote protection > AGAINST > > 7554 30 O omd Trading card cleanup > AGAINST > > 7555 3 65 O omd Self-ratification, victory, office changes > FOR (the victory changes are interesting, that's basically how BlogNomic > works; also I'm not entirely sure why we need the proposal pool to > self-ratify, but I guess it doesn't hurt) > > 7556 10 O omd Kirby I > AGAINST > > 7557 10 O omd too extraordinary > AGAINST; this is the sort of thing that we'd need only in specific > circumstances, and we can just re-enact it if that happens > > 7558 3 30 O Walker Walker's excellent* Agoran red-tape > > .. removal proposal** > AGAINST > > 7559 3 30 O Walker humbug > AGAINST; holiday gameplay is fun, so it's nice to have it at a time when > people are active (yes, I know this is the opposite of what it looks > like the rule is for) > > 7561 10 O Machiavelli 沖縄の線の修理 > PRESENT > > 7563 10 O omd Clarify inaccuracy ban > FOR > > 7564 30 O omd The Logic that Never Was > PRESENT; the logical requirement is good, but the first part of this > seems to disallow scams altogether > > -- > ais523 > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7548-7564
ok i must know less about nomic than i thought i didn't know there was a correct and incorrect vote On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Charles Walker wrote: > On 1 Aug 2013 19:35, "Max Schutz" wrote: > > > > I need a little more intel on the red tape humbug and kirby proposal > > FOR, AGAINST and AGAINST respectively. There's a trick where you convert > the proposal text into a folded string which shows you the correct vote. > I'll show you sometime. >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7548-7564
On 1 Aug 2013 19:35, "Max Schutz" wrote: > > I need a little more intel on the red tape humbug and kirby proposal FOR, AGAINST and AGAINST respectively. There's a trick where you convert the proposal text into a folded string which shows you the correct vote. I'll show you sometime.
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7548-7564
I need a little more intel on the red tape humbug and kirby proposal On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: > I vote: > > > 7548 10 O Ienpw IIIStandardized election days > FOR (this is unambiguous enough for my taste) > > > 7549 2 25 O Walker Recruitment Sanity > FOR > > > 7550 30 O omd Democratic Democracy Only > PRESENT > > > 7551 20 O omd Ministry fix and buff > FOR (there is no "Rule 412 (Government)", but this reference is clearly > unambiguous) > > > 7552 20 O omd Freshdated > FOR > > > 7553 3 20 O omd Remove useless vote protection > PRESENT > > > 7554 30 O omd Trading card cleanup > FOR > > > 7555 3 65 O omd Self-ratification, victory, office changes > NO VOTE > > > 7556 10 O omd Kirby I > AGAINST > > > 7557 10 O omd too extraordinary > PRESENT > > > 7558 3 30 O Walker Walker's excellent* Agoran red-tape > > .. removal proposal** > FOR > > > 7559 3 30 O Walker humbug > PRESENT > > > 7561 10 O Machiavelli 沖縄の線の修理 > FOR > > > 7563 10 O omd Clarify inaccuracy ban > FOR > > > 7564 30 O omd The Logic that Never Was > AGAINST > > ―Machiavelli
