Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 8940-8945

[Janet Cobb via agora-discussion]

On 4/2/23 15:32, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>>> 8945~   snail   2.0   Going up
>> AGAINST - what a horribly overpowered idea, rule power shouldn't be
>> gamefied by ephemera.
> It's fine if it's overpowered, it's quarterly! (Glances at the recursion 
> stone)
>
> But seriously, power just BEGS to be gameified, that's my immediate thought 
> when looking at it, up until the power 3 things. I think playing around at 
> power 2 and less should be fine. Has anything like this been tried before?
>
> --
> snail
>
>

Power values are carefully set for both precedence and security reasons.

-- 
Janet Cobb

Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 8940-8945

[secretsnail9 via agora-discussion]

>> 8945~   snail   2.0   Going up
> AGAINST - what a horribly overpowered idea, rule power shouldn't be
> gamefied by ephemera.

It's fine if it's overpowered, it's quarterly! (Glances at the recursion stone)

But seriously, power just BEGS to be gameified, that's my immediate thought 
when looking at it, up until the power 3 things. I think playing around at 
power 2 and less should be fine. Has anything like this been tried before?

--
snail