DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 9102-9110
On 4/29/24 22:30, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote: > I vote as follows: >> 9102~ juniper 1.0 An Overpowering Proposal > AGAINST > > >> 9103~ juniper 1.0 Dictator Takes the Quorum > AGAINST As requested: I have voted against these because I don't want to incentivize trying to take recordkeeping offices for gameplay advantage (PM/Speaker are fine, of course) and because they don't match our standard wording conventions. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 9102-9110
On 4/30/24 02:43, wunst via agora-business wrote: >> 9102~ juniper 1.0 An Overpowering Proposal > AGAINST >> 9103~ juniper 1.0 Dictator Takes the Quorum > AGAINST >> 9104~ snail 1.0 Stamp Raffle fix > FOR >> 9105~ snail 1.0 Stamp Raffle Repeal > AGAINST >> 9106* snail...[1] 3.0 No Overpowered Deputizations > AGAINST This isn't just a response to wunst, because I see a lot in this particular distribution, but could I plead with people to explain *why* they vote against something? In my opinion it's a courtesy to the author so they get feeback that isn't just a rejection. -- nix Arbitor, Spendor
