Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Voting Limits
Benjamin Schultz wrote: Kindly RTF follow-up. Yes, I saw that (and Quazie's claim of error) immediately after posting. Sorry. Your correction was not to the PF, btw. Don't think that makes much difference, now that we don't have the formal COE procedure any more. -zefram
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Voting Limits
On Apr 13, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Zefram wrote: Benjamin Schultz wrote: Do you have a link to the agoranomic archive of the Pineapple Partnership delivering judgment? http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/ 2007-March/006180.html Thanks very much. - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Voting Limits
Benjamin Schultz wrote: Do you have a link to the agoranomic archive of the Pineapple Partnership delivering judgment? http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-March/006180.html -zefram
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Voting Limits
On Apr 12, 2007, at 5:26 AM, Zefram wrote: Benjamin Schultz wrote: Pineapple Partnership, c/o Zefram and Goethe 1 2 0 Didn't the Pineapple Partnership get a VC for judging? -zefram I can't find the records, and it probably happened when I had my mind on something else all week. Do you have a link to the agoranomic archive of the Pineapple Partnership delivering judgment? - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Voting Limits
On Mar 23, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: Zefram wrote: Benjamin Schultz wrote: Zefram 1 1 0 I should have a VC for delivering judgement, and I expect several other players should too. Since 2007-01-22, R2126 includes: A player who submits a judgement during eir Deliberation Period gains one VC. A player whose judgement is overturned loses one VC, if e has any. I believe this is a complete list of all such changes so far: 1589 -1 GreyKnight 1598 +1 GreyKnight 1599 +1 OscarMeyr 1605 +1 Murphy 1614 +1 OscarMeyr 1618 +1 Zefram 1619 +1 Zefram 1620 +1 Zefram 1600 +1 Murphy 1601 +1 Murphy 1603 +1 Murphy 1604 +1 Murphy 1613 +1 Peter 1622 +1 Goethe Now that the Ruleset is up to date again, I should resume work on Two-Tone Economics and some other protos. Thanks for the list. The next voting limit report will include these counts. - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Voting Limits
Zefram wrote: Benjamin Schultz wrote: Zefram 1 1 0 I should have a VC for delivering judgement, and I expect several other players should too. Since 2007-01-22, R2126 includes: A player who submits a judgement during eir Deliberation Period gains one VC. A player whose judgement is overturned loses one VC, if e has any. I believe this is a complete list of all such changes so far: 1589 -1 GreyKnight 1598 +1 GreyKnight 1599 +1 OscarMeyr 1605 +1 Murphy 1614 +1 OscarMeyr 1618 +1 Zefram 1619 +1 Zefram 1620 +1 Zefram 1600 +1 Murphy 1601 +1 Murphy 1603 +1 Murphy 1604 +1 Murphy 1613 +1 Peter 1622 +1 Goethe Now that the Ruleset is up to date again, I should resume work on Two-Tone Economics and some other protos.
