Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5731-5731
Elliott Hird wrote: We heard you the first time with your giant toppost. I apologize for spamming everyone with these notices, but there were five separate proposal distributions that I was dealing with. I quoted the entire notice and put my notice on top (toppost as you say) since my notice applied to the entire quoted notice and I wanted my notice to be prominently visible. I seem to remember a time when proposals were only distributed once a week and actually required game resources (papyri I believe) to distribute. I don't remember Agora generating 200+ emails over the span of a couple days back then... -- Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) PGP public key available from http://pgp.mit.edu/ PGP Key ID: 0x14B456ED
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5731-5731
We heard you the first time with your giant toppost.
On 02/10/2008, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The quoted notice is invalid because it lacks information required by
Rule 107. Specifically, the following information was not provided:
(c) A clear indication of the options available.
The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
This distribution of proposal 5731 initiates the Agoran
Decisions on whether to adopt it. The eligible voters for ordinary
proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic
proposals are the active first-class players, and the vote collector
is the Assessor.
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
5731 D 0 3.0 Goethe Loss of Privileges
chamber: O = Ordinary; D = Democratic
interest: 0-3 = interest index
Proposal ID numbers:
highest orderly: 5731
disorderly: none
Proposal pool: empty
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 5731 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=0) by Goethe
Loss of Privileges
Amend Rule 101 by removing every occurrence of the phrase
or privileges.
Amend Rule 101 by removing the sentence A person's defined privileges
are assumed to exist in the absence of an explicit, binding
agreement to the contrary.
Amend Rule 101 by replacing the paragraph labeled i. with the
following paragraph:
i. Every person has the right, though not necessarily the
ability, to perform actions that are not prohibited or
regulated by the Rules, with the sole exception of
changing the Rules, which is permitted only when the
Rules explicitly or implicitly permit it.
--
Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)
PGP public key available from http://pgp.mit.edu/
PGP Key ID: 0x14B456ED
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5731-5731
On 02/10/2008, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Elliott Hird wrote: We heard you the first time with your giant toppost. I apologize for spamming everyone with these notices, but there were five separate proposal distributions that I was dealing with. I quoted the entire notice and put my notice on top (toppost as you say) since my notice applied to the entire quoted notice and I wanted my notice to be prominently visible. I seem to remember a time when proposals were only distributed once a week and actually required game resources (papyri I believe) to distribute. I don't remember Agora generating 200+ emails over the span of a couple days back then... Some distributespam was testing bayes -- Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) PGP public key available from http://pgp.mit.edu/ PGP Key ID: 0x14B456ED
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5731-5731
Elliott Hird wrote: Some distributespam was testing bayes Those proposals are easy enough to deal with. I'm not too worried about them, yet. -- Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) PGP public key available from http://pgp.mit.edu/ PGP Key ID: 0x14B456ED
