Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5734-5739
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> 5734 O 1 1.0 Wooble No More Monster Deputy >> FORx8 > > Your voting limit on these ordinary proposals is 1. (They were > distributed after your platonic demotion from Alpha at the start > of the month, but before your promotion on October 5.) :( -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5734-5739
Taral wrote: >> 5734 O 1 1.0 Wooble No More Monster Deputy > FORx8 Your voting limit on these ordinary proposals is 1. (They were distributed after your platonic demotion from Alpha at the start of the month, but before your promotion on October 5.)
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5734-5739
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Besides, are those truly the ONLY options? Isn't there an option to > endorse another player? Contracts (Vote Market in particular) appear to > have added additional options. Given the controversy regarding the > adoption (or lack thereof) of proposal 5707, we may need to be more > careful here. Yes. The others are conditional votes, which must still resolve to one of those three options. -root
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5734-5739
comex wrote: > For any Agoran decision with an adoption index, the available options > are FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT. Yes, yes... I am aware of the options. The issue is that the notice didn't specify them. Besides, are those truly the ONLY options? Isn't there an option to endorse another player? Contracts (Vote Market in particular) appear to have added additional options. Given the controversy regarding the adoption (or lack thereof) of proposal 5707, we may need to be more careful here. -- Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) PGP public key available from http://pgp.mit.edu/ PGP Key ID: 0x14B456ED
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5734-5739
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The quoted notice is invalid because it lacks information required by > Rule 107. Specifically, the following information was not provided: > > (c) A clear indication of the options available. For any Agoran decision with an adoption index, the available options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT. -- hopefully minor troll
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5734-5739
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Bayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bayes votes as follows: > 5736 FOR*2 > 5737 FOR*2 > 5738 FOR*2 Note that this is not favoritism. Bayes keeps generating random proposals to submit until it's found one that it will vote for. Therefore, it will only ever vote against its own proposal if an Assessor message is sent in between the proposal's submission and distribution that pushes the spam filter over the edge. -- hopefully minor evil
