DIS: Re: BUS: Re: yin yang

[Zefram]

comex wrote:
I submit the following set of linked CFJs (largely redundant to each other and 
to previous CFJs):

I think they're entirely redundant with prior CFJs, except for the
question of what the name Yin Corp actually refers to now.  Initially it
referred to a partnership of Zefram and Quazie.  If the final structure
of entwined partnership agreements and no actual natural persons is a
different person from that initial partnership, then we have to decide
which one has the better claim on the name Yin Corp.  Or it could just
be judged unclear, of course.

-zefram

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: yin yang

[Ed Murphy]

Zefram wrote:


That's all the yin/yang activity we have planned.  For the record,
all changes of membership of both partnerships have taken place in the
public forum.  The present membership is:

* of Yin Corp: Yin Corp, Yang Corp

* of Yang Corp: Yin Corp, Yang Corp

Or at least, that's the membership under the corporation-style identity
mechanism that we've been assuming for this sequence.


For convenience, here's a short list of the sequence of purported events
leading to this state of affairs.

Yin = Q+Z registers
Yang = Z+Yin registers
Yang joins Yin (Yin = Q+Z+Yang)
Yin joins Yin (Yin = Q+Z+Yin+Yang)
Yang joins Yang (Yang = Z+Yin+Yang)
Z leaves Yin (Yin = Q+Yin+Yang)
Z leaves Yang (Yang = Yin+Yang)
Q leaves Yin (Yin = Yin+Yang)