Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Teams proposal
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 18:35 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: ais523 wrote: If there is ever simultaneously one or more empty Teams, and one or more Independent players, then the any player CAN by announcement, and the Referee SHALL as soon as possible unless someone else does first, distribute all Independent players among all empty teams. This would cause a single Independent player to win immediately upon the distribution. I'm not convinced that's a problem; I can't think of a situation in which such a distribution could happen, except if a new player joined immediately after an entire team deregistered (and if that happened, why wouldn't the last player on that team to deregister snatch a win immediately before deregistering?) I agree with the other comments, though; I'll retract and repropose (maybe not immediately) to deal with them. Also, where are the vuvuzelas? Not in this proposal, although of course they can be added later. -- ais523
DIS: Re: BUS: Teams proposal
ais523 wrote: A Team is a sort of entity defined by the rules; creation and destruction of Teams is secured. Each Teams have a name, which if not Each Team has a name If there is ever simultaneously one or more empty Teams, and one or more Independent players, then the any player CAN by announcement, and the Referee SHALL as soon as possible unless someone else does first, distribute all Independent players among all empty teams. This would cause a single Independent player to win immediately upon the distribution. The Referee is an office, which does most of the tracking related to Teams. Eir report includes (among other things, described in other rules) a list of all Teams. The parenthetical exception is typically left implicit in The X's report includes Y clauses. The Referee MAY list in eir weekly report a list of all Fans and their owners at the time of the last Power Station Manager's report, rather than a list of all Fans and their owners as of the time of eir own report; doing so does not violate rule 2166 or 2143, and this rule takes precedence over rule 2166. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the Referee's requirement to report a list of all instances of Fans and their owners is satisfied by publishing such a list as of the time of the last PSM's report. or Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the Referee's requirement to report a list of all instances of Fans and their owners need not reflect changes since the last PSM's report. Whenever a non-Independent player gains an erg, the Team that player's Allegiance is set to gains a Fan. ...that player's Team gains a Fan. Also, where are the vuvuzelas?
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Teams proposal
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: If there is ever simultaneously one or more empty Teams, and one or more Independent players, then the any player CAN by announcement, and the Referee SHALL as soon as possible unless someone else does first, distribute all Independent players among all empty teams. This would cause a single Independent player to win immediately upon the distribution. The any player accidentally huh? report; doing so does not violate rule 2166 or 2143, and this rule takes precedence over rule 2166. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the Referee's requirement to report a list of all instances of Fans and their owners is satisfied by publishing such a list as of the time of the last PSM's report. Yeah, mentioning rule numbers is ugly. Also, where are the vuvuzelas?
