Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal 8971
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 00:01 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > It doesn't do anything. It has insufficient power to create blots. Ah right, AI 1 but it needs 1.7 (rule 2555). So I agree with you, false alarm. Assuming that the author didn't intentionally set the AI incorrectly, though, this is still evidence that the original proposal was ill- advised. -- ais523
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal 8971
On 5/19/23 00:00, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 23:09 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote: >> The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below: >> > [snip] >> Grant each player that did not vote FOR this proposal 2 blots. > Whoever decided to propose this immediately before several new players > joined (with timing that meant that they had no ability to vote on it > and thus save themself from the blots), you should be ashamed of > yourself. (I think it was mentioned at the time that it was unfair on > inactive players – we missed that it'd be unfair on new players too, > but it's a similar principle.) > > The players who have been around a little longer should probably be > working on cleaning them off the players who just joined? I'm willing > to use my weekly expunge on this, but am not sure which of the new > players to use it on. (I'm planning to use it later this week on one of > the new players, whoever's had the least help from other established > players, randomizing if there's a tie.) > It doesn't do anything. It has insufficient power to create blots. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal 8971
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 23:09 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote: > The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below: > [snip] > > Grant each player that did not vote FOR this proposal 2 blots. Whoever decided to propose this immediately before several new players joined (with timing that meant that they had no ability to vote on it and thus save themself from the blots), you should be ashamed of yourself. (I think it was mentioned at the time that it was unfair on inactive players – we missed that it'd be unfair on new players too, but it's a similar principle.) The players who have been around a little longer should probably be working on cleaning them off the players who just joined? I'm willing to use my weekly expunge on this, but am not sure which of the new players to use it on. (I'm planning to use it later this week on one of the new players, whoever's had the least help from other established players, randomizing if there's a tie.) -- ais523
