i would like to know why in god's name have we gone from the 8000s to the
3000s with a letter on top, why not use the 9000s???
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:48 PM Aris Merchant via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> It has come to the attention of the Promotorial Proposal Office that
> certain
> proposals were incorrectly numbered. I apologize for this lapse.
> All proposals numbered 35## are hereby renumbered 33##, where the final two
> digits remain the same. Here is a revised index of proposals up for vote
> (each of the decisions on whether to adopt them has a quorum of 6).
> All players are hereby advised to treat these numbers as canonical from
> the present moment forward, and to vote in reply to this index
> as if it were an original distribution.
>
> ID Author(s)AITitle
> ---
> 8322* Falsifian, Alexis, twg 3.0 Unrepetition v1.1
> 8323* Jason3.0 Secure Ribbons
> 8324l Falsifian2.0 Democratic unassignment
> 8325e Falsifian2.0 Inflation Vote
> 3326* Falsifian3.0 Attempted cleanup
> 3327l Falsifian1.0 Blink test v1.2
> 3328* Falsifian3.0 The Eternal Sprit
> 3329p Alexis 1.0 RtRW Reschedule
> 3330* G. 3.0 No looting white ribbons
> 3331j Warrigal 1.7 Promissory cleanliness
> 3332f Murphy, Alexis 1.0 Switch Responsibility Responsibility
> l Murphy, Alexis 2.0 Meaningful extra votes
> 3334e Murphy, Alexis 2.0 Meaningless extra coins
> 3335f Murphy 2.0 Consistent ADoP duties
> 3336* Jason3.0 Define "publicly"
> 3337e Murphy 1.0 Fix Auctions
> 3338l Murphy 2.0 Clarify quorum (option 1)
> 3339l Murphy 2.0 Clarify quorum (option 2)
> 3340p Alexis 1.0 The Paradox of Self-Appointment
> 3341* Alexis, G. 3.0 Support of the Person
>
> The proposal pool is currently empty.
>
> Legend: * : Democratic proposal.
> # : Ordinary proposal, unset chamber.
> e : Economy ministry proposal.
> f : Efficiency ministry proposal.
> j : Justice ministry proposal.
> l : Legislation ministry proposal.
> p : Participation ministry proposal.
>
>
> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below.
>
>
> //
> ID: 8322
> Title: Unrepetition v1.1
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Falsifian
> Co-authors: Alexis, twg
>
>
> For each of Proposals 8287-8307, if the proposal took effect more than
> once, then any changes to rule text caused by the second and later
> times the proposal took effect are considered "extra" for the purposes
> of this proposal.
>
> Reverse all such "extra" changes, in the reverse of the order in which
> they occurred.
>
> [Comment: See
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2020-February/056587.html
> for context. I think the changes this undoes are relatively benign,
> but it's nice to have certainty about the state of the ruleset.]
>
> //
> ID: 8323
> Title: Secure Ribbons
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Jason
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing the text "Ribbon Ownership is a
> person switch" with the text "Ribbon Ownership is a secured person switch".
>
> //
> ID: 8324
> Title: Democratic unassignment
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: Falsifian
> Co-authors:
>
>
> If Proposal 8320 (Promotorial Assignment) has been adopted, then amend
> the rule entitled "Proposal Chambers" by replacing "If a proposal in
> the Proposal Pool has its chamber unset" with "If the chamber of an
> ordinary proposal in the Proposal Pool is unset".
>
> //
> ID: 8325
> Title: Inflation Vote
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: Falsifian
> Co-authors:
>
>
> [Comments:
>
> Are we just going to let a steady stream of sufficiently dedicated
> players claim their standard victories? I say we raise the bar a
> little.
>
> There's been some talk of a larger re-working of the economy. In the
> meantime, this proposal calls for players to vote on a new number to
> replace the 1,000 coin victory fee. The median vote wins, favouring the
> higher vote if there are two middle votes.
>
> ]
>
> For the purpose of this proposal:
>
> * An Inflation Ballot is a body of text published during the voting
> period of this proposal that clearly, directly and without
> obfuscation specifies a single non-negative integer and that it is an
> Inflation Ballot.
>
> * Each player's Inflation Vote is
