Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1779: assign comex

2007-11-05 Thread Ian Kelly
On 11/5/07, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 11/4/07, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 11/4/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I hereby assign comex as judge of CFJ 1779.
 
  Pseudo-judgement: UNDETERMINED, per the clear precedent set by CFJ 1744.

 In CFJ 1744, there was no evidence one way or another whether Big
 Brother was a person.

Sorry, that wasn't meant to be sent yet.  To continue, in this case,
BobTHJ has publicly asserted Fookiemyartug to be a person, which
supports a judgement of TRUE.

-root


Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1779: assign comex

2007-11-05 Thread comex
On Monday 05 November 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
 On 11/5/07, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 11/4/07, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On 11/4/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hereby assign comex as judge of CFJ 1779.
  
   Pseudo-judgement: UNDETERMINED, per the clear precedent set by CFJ
   1744.
 
  In CFJ 1744, there was no evidence one way or another whether Big
  Brother was a person.

 Sorry, that wasn't meant to be sent yet.  To continue, in this case,
 BobTHJ has publicly asserted Fookiemyartug to be a person, which
 supports a judgement of TRUE.

FYI, that pseudo-judgement was sent before said assertion. :)


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1779: assign comex

2007-11-04 Thread comex
On 11/4/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I hereby assign comex as judge of CFJ 1779.

Pseudo-judgement: UNDETERMINED, per the clear precedent set by CFJ 1744.