DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5700-5706
I will not be casting votes of SELL (2VP); since I'm a Slave, anyone can do that for me, and I think it's a reasonable assumption that if nobody does so, nobody wants it done, so I shouldn't be punished if the votes are never cast. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5700-5706
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:37 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 15:31 -0400, ihope wrote: >> I will not be casting votes of SELL (2VP); since I'm a Slave, anyone >> can do that for me, and I think it's a reasonable assumption that if >> nobody does so, nobody wants it done, so I shouldn't be punished if >> the votes are never cast. >> >> --Ivan Hope CXXVII > > Well, I act on behalf of Ivan Hope CXXVII to cast SELL (2VP) on proposal > 5707. Unless you plan on buying it, I wish you wouldn't. That vote is now going to count toward quorum, regardless of whether anyone ends up directing it or not. -root
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5700-5706
root wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:37 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 15:31 -0400, ihope wrote: >>> I will not be casting votes of SELL (2VP); since I'm a Slave, anyone >>> can do that for me, and I think it's a reasonable assumption that if >>> nobody does so, nobody wants it done, so I shouldn't be punished if >>> the votes are never cast. >>> >>> --Ivan Hope CXXVII >> Well, I act on behalf of Ivan Hope CXXVII to cast SELL (2VP) on proposal >> 5707. > > Unless you plan on buying it, I wish you wouldn't. That vote is now > going to count toward quorum, regardless of whether anyone ends up > directing it or not. Huh? *re-reads Vote Market contract* Oh dear, I've missed recording any number of such votes that went unsold, though (a) it had little/no substantive effect and (b) most of those results have ratified by now. While I'm thinking of it, I also noticed over the weekend that I'd missed recording three gains of a B note (two of them modulated) for II=2 proposals. I've fixed the database, and the next Conductor's report will reflect the fix.
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5700-5706
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 14:31 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > Unless you plan on buying it, I wish you wouldn't. That vote is now > going to count toward quorum, regardless of whether anyone ends up > directing it or not. Well, given that I didn't want proposal 5707 to fail quorum, it was a sensible action on my part, again whether it was directed or not. Causing other people to vote PRESENT rather than NONE is a marginally good deal on a proposal you want passed... -- ais523
