DIS: Rule 1868 Paradox
Ed Murphy wrote: Jacob Sutton wrote: Rule 1868 states that a CFJ is open if it has not been judged and closed if it is not open So, if a case has been judged, there is no rule keeping it from still being considered open. Correct. So it's not open. (Assuming it also doesn't have any outstanding motions.) Just because it is open before it's judged doesn't mean that's the only time it's open. Invisible Pink Unicorns are beings of great spiritual power. We know this because they are capable of being invisible and pink at the same time. Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them. --Steve Eley - TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV.
Re: DIS: Rule 1868 Paradox
Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jacob Sutton wrote: Just because it is open before it's judged doesn't mean that's the only time it's open. Check out CFJ 1575: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1575 I guess that case could be reopened, then. Invisible Pink Unicorns are beings of great spiritual power. We know this because they are capable of being invisible and pink at the same time. Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them. --Steve Eley - Never Miss an Email Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started!
Re: DIS: Rule 1868 Paradox
Jacob Sutton wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: Jacob Sutton wrote: Rule 1868 states that a CFJ is open if it has not been judged and closed if it is not open So, if a case has been judged, there is no rule keeping it from still being considered open. Correct. So it's not open. (Assuming it also doesn't have any outstanding motions.) Just because it is open before it's judged doesn't mean that's the only time it's open. The implicit pattern is that X becomes Y when Z causes X to remain Y until something explicitly makes it become not-Y, while X is Y if Z causes X to cease being Y as soon as Z stops being true. (X is Y while Z or X is Y if and only if Z would be clearer.)
