Re: DIS: jobs
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 15:21, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > On Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:19 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey > wrote: > > I would be happy to take it on if I can get Trigon's code working. > > which reminds me, can someone add me to the GitHub org? My username is @qenya. > > -twg For the list: looks like twg is in the GitHub org now Welcome! -- - Falsifian
Re: DIS: jobs
I seem to recall that manually typing “BUS:” before message subjects prevents the mailing list from changing messages at all, solving some of these issues. Gaelan > On Oct 26, 2019, at 9:55 AM, "ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk" > wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 16:23 +, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: >> It's not just you who isn't receiving it. I'm not receiving Nch's >> mail either. >> >> Nch, could you send an email directly to my mailserver at >> ? That might help to debug whatever issues >> are going wrong with the mail verification. > > Based on the verification information I saw from this, it's going to be > pretty difficult for Nch's emails to appear genuine if going through > the mailing list; there are multiple verification steps that seem > almost impossible to comply with after the list has altered the > message. > > I wonder whether it might be a sensible idea to get the mailing list to > rewrite From: addresses, thus making the entire From-address > verification step moot? (Perhaps only in the case of known problematic > mail providers; does our software have an option for that?) > > -- > ais523 >
Re: DIS: jobs
On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 16:23 +, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: > It's not just you who isn't receiving it. I'm not receiving Nch's > mail either. > > Nch, could you send an email directly to my mailserver at > ? That might help to debug whatever issues > are going wrong with the mail verification. Based on the verification information I saw from this, it's going to be pretty difficult for Nch's emails to appear genuine if going through the mailing list; there are multiple verification steps that seem almost impossible to comply with after the list has altered the message. I wonder whether it might be a sensible idea to get the mailing list to rewrite From: addresses, thus making the entire From-address verification step moot? (Perhaps only in the case of known problematic mail providers; does our software have an option for that?) -- ais523
Re: DIS: jobs
On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 15:36 +, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > On Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:22 PM, Nch > wrote: > > I'm ccing you here, so let me know if you get this one. I suspect > > your spam filter doesn't like *@protonmail and you need to add an > > exception. (Someone might want to quote this back on AD for em in > > case it doesn't make it through.) > > Ah, everything makes sense now. It's not obvious because I use my > own domain name, but I am _also_ using ProtonMail, and I'm just gonna > make a wild guess that their mail exchange servers don't like it when > third parties (like agoranomic.org) send emails purporting to be from > @protonmail.com addresses. > > Unfortunately I doubt there's going to be an easy way around it. Hmm. > For now I guess I'll just keep an eye on mail-archive.com for > messages from you, and set up a non-PM email account for Agora when I > get around to it. It's not just you who isn't receiving it. I'm not receiving Nch's mail either. Nch, could you send an email directly to my mailserver at ? That might help to debug whatever issues are going wrong with the mail verification. -- ais523
Re: DIS: jobs
I could set up a mail rule to forward you everything from *@protonmail.com to the Agora lists. Depending on how that forwarding works, it might get past the filter. Gaelan > On Oct 26, 2019, at 8:36 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > On Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:22 PM, Nch wrote: >> I'm ccing you here, so let me know if you get this one. I suspect your spam >> filter doesn't like *@protonmail and you need to add an exception. (Someone >> might want to quote this back on AD for em in case it doesn't make it >> through.) > > Ah, everything makes sense now. It's not obvious because I use my own > domain name, but I am _also_ using ProtonMail, and I'm just gonna make a wild > guess that their mail exchange servers don't like it when third parties (like > agoranomic.org) send emails purporting to be from @protonmail.com addresses. > > Unfortunately I doubt there's going to be an easy way around it. Hmm. For now > I guess I'll just keep an eye on mail-archive.com for messages from you, and > set up a non-PM email account for Agora when I get around to it. > > -twg
Re: DIS: jobs
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:22 PM, Nch wrote: > I'm ccing you here, so let me know if you get this one. I suspect your spam > filter doesn't like *@protonmail and you need to add an exception. (Someone > might want to quote this back on AD for em in case it doesn't make it > through.) Ah, everything makes sense now. It's not obvious because I use my own domain name, but I am _also_ using ProtonMail, and I'm just gonna make a wild guess that their mail exchange servers don't like it when third parties (like agoranomic.org) send emails purporting to be from @protonmail.com addresses. Unfortunately I doubt there's going to be an easy way around it. Hmm. For now I guess I'll just keep an eye on mail-archive.com for messages from you, and set up a non-PM email account for Agora when I get around to it. -twg
Re: DIS: jobs
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 26, 2019 10:25 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > Or we could set up some sort of contract (grumbles about having to study up > on Agoran contract law these days) to share the workload? I really need to (find,) finish and submit my Agoran Syndicalism proposal that abolishes Offices in favor of contract-based Unions at some point.
Re: DIS: jobs
I am also considering taking up the role, but I’m happy to leave it to you. Or we could set up some sort of contract (grumbles about having to study up on Agoran contract law these days) to share the workload? Gaelan > On Oct 26, 2019, at 8:19 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > On Saturday, October 26, 2019 1:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> [of course what we really need is a rulekeepor :) ] > > I would be happy to take it on if I can get Trigon's code working. Referee > has been a bit dull recently because everyone is being boring and obeying the > rules. > > (also, ftr, I'm still not getting any messages at all from nch, including the > one G. replied to here) > > -twg
Re: DIS: jobs
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 26, 2019 10:19 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > On Saturday, October 26, 2019 1:39 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@uw.edu wrote: > > > [of course what we really need is a rulekeepor :) ] > > I would be happy to take it on if I can get Trigon's code working. Referee > has been a bit dull recently because everyone is being boring and obeying the > rules. > > (also, ftr, I'm still not getting any messages at all from nch, including the > one G. replied to here) > > -twg I'm ccing you here, so let me know if you get this one. I suspect your spam filter doesn't like *@protonmail and you need to add an exception. (Someone might want to quote this back on AD for em in case it doesn't make it through.)
Re: DIS: jobs
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 3:19 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > I would be happy to take it on if I can get Trigon's code working. which reminds me, can someone add me to the GitHub org? My username is @qenya. -twg
Re: DIS: jobs
On Saturday, October 26, 2019 1:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > [of course what we really need is a rulekeepor :) ] I would be happy to take it on if I can get Trigon's code working. Referee has been a bit dull recently because everyone is being boring and obeying the rules. (also, ftr, I'm still not getting any messages at all from nch, including the one G. replied to here) -twg
Re: DIS: jobs
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 26, 2019 8:39 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > nch wrote: > > > ...and reduce consolidation. > > As we are picking up again, I'd be more than happy for someone > else to be Tailor. > > Same for Herald, tho I'd like to clear up the current report > ratification first, and and I'd ask that any takers be really > keen on promoting herald stuff (through tournaments, patent titles, > etc.) > I'd definitely stand for Tailor. I don't think I have time for Herald. > [of course what we really need is a rulekeepor :) ] This is imperative.
DIS: jobs
nch wrote: > ...and reduce consolidation. As we are picking up again, I'd be more than happy for someone else to be Tailor. Same for Herald, tho I'd like to clear up the current report ratification first, and and I'd ask that any takers be *really* keen on promoting herald stuff (through tournaments, patent titles, etc.) [of course what we really need is a rulekeepor :) ]
