Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: IADoP - Letting you know Who's Who in Agora

[Zefram]

comex wrote:
I state under penalty of perjury that the membership of the HP2 agreement 
*has* changed since its registration.

Yeah, since we don't have the concept of perjury any more (and actually
it was never applicable in this type of situation) these statements
don't carry the weight that is intended.  I think it's unfortunate that
misrepresentation, which had more general utility, has also been repealed.

-zefram

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: IADoP - Letting you know Who's Who in Agora

[Ed Murphy]

comex wrote:


On Thursday 17 May 2007 11:41 pm, Ed Murphy wrote:

While I'm at it, I state under penalty of perjury that the
membership of the HP2 agreement has not changed since its
registration, thus HP2's existence as a registered player
is not contingent on the outcome of CFJ 1668.


I state under penalty of perjury that the membership of the HP2 agreement 
*has* changed since its registration.


Well, it's a good thing for one of us that perjury is no longer
defined by the rules, isn't it?  :)

Someone could probably get a decent thesis out of analyzing the
potential legal and social consequences of willful lies (largely
dependent on whether other players have reasonable cause to suspect
them as being lies).