> The previous provisions of this paragraph do not apply to an asset if the
organization is required to provided that asset in order to continue
existing.
I think there is a grammar mistake somewhere in that sentence, and if it
exists it should be fixed.
Aside from that, it looks OK.
天火狐
On 4 June 2017 at 01:52, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> This will be the last draft of this proposal before I submit it.
>
> -Aris
>
> Title: Assets v5
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: o, nichdel
>
> Reenact rule 2166, Assets (Power = 2), with the following text:
>
> An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule (hereafter its backing
> document), and existing solely because its backing document defines its
> existence.
>
> Each asset has exactly one owner. If an asset would otherwise
> lack an owner, it is owned by Agora. If an asset's backing document
> restricts
> its ownership to a class of entities, then that asset CANNOT be gained
> by or
> transferred to an entity outside that class, and is destroyed if it is
> owned
> by an entity outside that class (except for Agora, in which case any
> player
> CAN transfer or destroy it without objection). The restrictions in the
> previous sentence are subject to modification by its backing document.
>
> Unless modified by an asset's backing document, ownership of an asset is
> restricted to Agora, persons, and organizations.
>
> An organization's charter CAN specify whether or not that organization is
> willing receive assets or a class of assets. Generally, an organization
> CANNOT
> be given assets its charter states that it is unwilling to receive. The
> previous provisions of this paragraph do not apply to an asset if the
> organization is required to provided that asset in order to continue
> existing.
>
>
> The recordkeepor of a class of assets is the entity (if any)
> defined as such by, and bound by, its backing document. That
> entity's report includes a list of all instances of that class
> and their owners. This portion of that entity's report is
> self-ratifying.
>
> An asset generally CAN be destroyed by its owner by
> announcement, subject to modification by its backing document.
> To "lose" an asset is to have it destroyed from one's
> possession; to "revoke" an asset from an entity is to destroy it
> from that entity's possession.
>
> An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. payed) by its owner to
> another
> entity by announcement, subject to modification by its backing
> document. A fixed asset is one defined as such by its backing
> document, and CANNOT be transferred; any other asset is liquid.
>
> A currency is a class of asset defined as such by its backing
> document. Instances of a currency with the same owner are
> fungible.
>
> The "x balance of an entity", where x is a currency, is the number of x
> that
> entity possesses. If a rule or proposal attempts to increase or decrease
> the
> balance of an entity without specifying a source or destination, then the
> currency is created or destroyed. Where it resolves ambiguity, "Balance",
> without any currency modifiers, refers to an entity's balance of
> whichever
> currency is designated as "Agora's official currency", if there is one.
>
> Assets are always public. [To provide for private contract based assets
> later]
>
> Change the power of Rule 2166 to 3.0.
>
> Change the rule "Economics" to read in full:
>
> Shinies (sg. shiny) are a liquid currency, and the official currency of
> Agora.
> They may be owned by Agora, any player, or any organization. The
> Secretary is
> the recordkeepor for Shinies.
>
> The Secretary CAN cause Agora to pay any player or organization by
> announcement if doing so is specified by a rule.
>
> Shinies cannot be destroyed, except as allowed by rules specifically
> addressing the destruction of Shinies. Any otherwise successful
> attempt to destroy Shinies instead transfers them to Agora.
>
> Amend Rule 2459, Organizations, by adding as a paragraph at the end:
>
> A member of an Organization CAN perform any action the rules authorize
> that
> Organization to perform, if the Organization's charter states that doing
> so
> is Appropriate.
>
> For the avoidance of doubt, all shinies existing under the old system
> continue
> to so under the new system, and if they would not otherwise do so, new
> shinies
> are created to replace them.
>
>
> Amend the rule "The Surveyor" to have the folowing text:
>
> The Surveyor is an office, and the recordkeepor of estates.
>
> Amend the rule "Estates" to have the following text:
>
> An Estate is a type of liquid asset, which can be owned by players,
> organizations, and Agora. The following changes are secured:
> creating, modifying, or destroying an Estate; and causing an
> entity to become an Estate or cease to be an Estate.
>
> Estates cannot be destroyed, except as allowed by rules specifical