Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Human Point Two and I have made a R1742 binding agreement, the text of
which is:
I believe this doesn't work. Obligations on HP3 are translated, by
that agreement, into obligations on HP2 and Murphy, and then by HP2's
agreement into obligations on Quazie and Murphy. Obligations on HPn all
amount to obligations on Quazie and Murphy. The subject of obligations
is the same in all cases, so they're all the same legal person.
But the things that the natural persons are obligated to do are
different. A bit trivially in this particular case, but consider
the following hypothetical situation:
Five players create and register a Pineapple-type partnership (whose
charter merely obliges them to cause it to obey the Agoran rules). They
happen to be the five natural-person members of Primo Corporation (whose
charter obliges them to do various things internal to Primo, e.g.
maintain records). Are these counted as a single partnership, and the
charters counted as a single charter?
One of the five then claims to leave the Pineapple-type partnership, but
remain part of Primo. Now what happens?
