Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:21:06 -0800 Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why make it different than 30-days due to normal deregistration? Facing > > this, I'd personally just write an equally pissed-off letter followed by > > "this is not a Cantus Cygnus, I deregister." The point of Writ of FAGE > > is to give a colorful outlet and thus perhaps defuse the tension, it > > shouldn't be punished. -G. > > It's not punishment. It's to ensure that you *really* want to leave. > Perhaps we should do 15 and 30 instead of 30 and 90? Indeed. It is rather anti-climactic for someone to make a grand exit, only to return soon thereafter. -- Elysion
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why make it different than 30-days due to normal deregistration? Facing > this, I'd personally just write an equally pissed-off letter followed by > "this is not a Cantus Cygnus, I deregister." The point of Writ of FAGE > is to give a colorful outlet and thus perhaps defuse the tension, it > shouldn't be punished. -G. It's not punishment. It's to ensure that you *really* want to leave. Perhaps we should do 15 and 30 instead of 30 and 90? -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Joshua Boehme wrote: > A player who has deregistered in a Writ of FAGE may not register > within ninety days of eir deregistration, other rules to the contrary > notwithstanding. Why make it different than 30-days due to normal deregistration? Facing this, I'd personally just write an equally pissed-off letter followed by "this is not a Cantus Cygnus, I deregister." The point of Writ of FAGE is to give a colorful outlet and thus perhaps defuse the tension, it shouldn't be punished. -G.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Monday 17 November 2008 07:55:00 pm comex wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> A player who has deregistered in a Writ of FAGE may not > >> register within thirty days of eir deregistration, other rules > >> to the contrary notwithstanding. > > > > Make it ninety. > > I'd vote for ninety, although arguably it is not possible to > deregister in a Writ of FAGE unless one is the Registrar. "who has been deregistered in a Writ of FAGE".
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It (AI=2)
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> A player who has deregistered in a Writ of FAGE may not register >> within thirty days of eir deregistration, other rules to the >> contrary notwithstanding. > > Make it ninety. I'd vote for ninety, although arguably it is not possible to deregister in a Writ of FAGE unless one is the Registrar.