Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sorry, mis-read my notes

[Sean Hunt]

ais523 wrote:

On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 07:30 -0400, comex wrote:

Wait, what?  Why not REMAND?


Because the case was originally assigned to Pavitra by mistake.

I was the judge at the time of the assignment; I don't believe I would 
not therefore be the prior judge.


-coppro

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sorry, mis-read my notes

[ais523]

On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 07:30 -0400, comex wrote:
> Wait, what?  Why not REMAND?

Because the case was originally assigned to Pavitra by mistake.

-- 
ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sorry, mis-read my notes

[comex]

Wait, what?  Why not REMAND?

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 16, 2009, at 5:26 AM, ais523   
wrote:



On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:20 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:

2009/9/16 Ed Murphy :

coppro wrote:


I assign myself as judge to CFJ 2679, and I judge it FALSE.


I intend, with 2 support, to appeal.  The arguments indicate that
the transfer failed, but the statement is "ais523 owns a Dunce Cap
card" which should have been judged TRUE.  I recommend REASSIGN,
as coppro presumably just mis-remembered the statement as "ais523
transferred a Dunce Cap card" or something similar.


I support.

I support and do so. Good arguments, but they don't match the  
judgement.

(Recommend REASSIGN to coppro so e can fix them.)

--
ais523