Re: DIS: Re: BUS: One last one for tonight.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:36 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 3/16/2020 10:01 PM, Rebecca wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:43 PM Alexis Hunt wrote: > >> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 13:01 Alexis Hunt wrote: > >>> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 12:46 Alexis Hunt, wrote: > On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions: > > > > 1. In "any player CAN cause this rule to repeal all Emergency > > Regulations and then itself." Why do we want the rule to repeal > > itself? > > Because I wrote it in a hurry and didn't intend it as a general > emergency rule. More of a short-term subgame. > >>> > >>> To clarify, the extension of deadlines is about the only thing I think > we > >>> really need in an emergency. And while in the past Agora's had that > >>> during > >>> the holiday season, we seem fine with the existing "only obligations > are > >>> excused". So I didn't want to try to write in a general mechanism just > to > >>> have all the effort repealed in 6 months. > >>> > >>> -Alexis > >>> > >> > >> My wife jokingly suggested that we have a zombie insurrection, not > knowing > >> that all our zombies have been lying around not auctioned off due to a > >> rules bug. > >> > > when is that getting fixed > > > > When proposal 8352 takes effect - hopefully. > > Also sorry - I didn't see your note about endorsing your votes until just > now and voting period closed a few hours ago. > > -G. > > that's okay, what i really want is for proposals like "CFJ setup" to not pass, but it looks like it would have passed anyway -- >From R. Lee
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: One last one for tonight.
On 3/16/2020 10:01 PM, Rebecca wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:43 PM Alexis Hunt wrote: >> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 13:01 Alexis Hunt wrote: >>> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 12:46 Alexis Hunt, wrote: On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions: > > 1. In "any player CAN cause this rule to repeal all Emergency > Regulations and then itself." Why do we want the rule to repeal > itself? Because I wrote it in a hurry and didn't intend it as a general emergency rule. More of a short-term subgame. >>> >>> To clarify, the extension of deadlines is about the only thing I think we >>> really need in an emergency. And while in the past Agora's had that >>> during >>> the holiday season, we seem fine with the existing "only obligations are >>> excused". So I didn't want to try to write in a general mechanism just to >>> have all the effort repealed in 6 months. >>> >>> -Alexis >>> >> >> My wife jokingly suggested that we have a zombie insurrection, not knowing >> that all our zombies have been lying around not auctioned off due to a >> rules bug. >> > when is that getting fixed > When proposal 8352 takes effect - hopefully. Also sorry - I didn't see your note about endorsing your votes until just now and voting period closed a few hours ago. -G.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: One last one for tonight.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:43 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 13:01 Alexis Hunt, wrote: > > > On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 12:46 Alexis Hunt, wrote: > > > >> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > >> agora-discussion, wrote: > >> > >>> I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions: > >>> > >>> 1. In "any player CAN cause this rule to repeal all Emergency > >>> Regulations and then itself." Why do we want the rule to repeal > >>> itself? > >>> > >> > >> Because I wrote it in a hurry and didn't intend it as a general > emergency > >> rule. More of a short-term subgame. > >> > > > > To clarify, the extension of deadlines is about the only thing I think we > > really need in an emergency. And while in the past Agora's had that > during > > the holiday season, we seem fine with the existing "only obligations are > > excused". So I didn't want to try to write in a general mechanism just to > > have all the effort repealed in 6 months. > > > > -Alexis > > > > My wife jokingly suggested that we have a zombie insurrection, not knowing > that all our zombies have been lying around not auctioned off due to a > rules bug. > > > > when is that getting fixed -- >From R. Lee
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: One last one for tonight.
On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 13:01 Alexis Hunt, wrote: > On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 12:46 Alexis Hunt, wrote: > >> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via >> agora-discussion, wrote: >> >>> I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions: >>> >>> 1. In "any player CAN cause this rule to repeal all Emergency >>> Regulations and then itself." Why do we want the rule to repeal >>> itself? >>> >> >> Because I wrote it in a hurry and didn't intend it as a general emergency >> rule. More of a short-term subgame. >> > > To clarify, the extension of deadlines is about the only thing I think we > really need in an emergency. And while in the past Agora's had that during > the holiday season, we seem fine with the existing "only obligations are > excused". So I didn't want to try to write in a general mechanism just to > have all the effort repealed in 6 months. > > -Alexis > My wife jokingly suggested that we have a zombie insurrection, not knowing that all our zombies have been lying around not auctioned off due to a rules bug. >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: One last one for tonight.
On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 12:46 Alexis Hunt, wrote: > On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > agora-discussion, wrote: > >> I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions: >> >> 1. In "any player CAN cause this rule to repeal all Emergency >> Regulations and then itself." Why do we want the rule to repeal >> itself? >> > > Because I wrote it in a hurry and didn't intend it as a general emergency > rule. More of a short-term subgame. > To clarify, the extension of deadlines is about the only thing I think we really need in an emergency. And while in the past Agora's had that during the holiday season, we seem fine with the existing "only obligations are excused". So I didn't want to try to write in a general mechanism just to have all the effort repealed in 6 months. -Alexis >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: One last one for tonight.
On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion, wrote: > I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions: > > 1. In "any player CAN cause this rule to repeal all Emergency > Regulations and then itself." Why do we want the rule to repeal > itself? > Because I wrote it in a hurry and didn't intend it as a general emergency rule. More of a short-term subgame. 2. Should "notwithstanding any rule that would prohibit a single > player from holding both offices." read "any rule that would prohibit > a single player from holding both offices notwithstanding."? > Notwithstanding is ambitransitive. -Alexis >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: one for one
NttPF. Sent from my iPhone On May 26, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: I spend 2 VCs to increase omd's VVLOP by 2. I cash two copies of that promise. -scshunt
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: one for one
Oh, and please specify what you're paying the cost for, while we wait for the relevant CFJ. Sent from my iPhone
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: one for one
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:03 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, and please specify what you're paying the cost for, while we wait for the relevant CFJ. Sent from my iPhone Too late. Care to fulfill the promise manually in case? -scshunt
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: one for one
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:35 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: Too late. Care to fulfill the promise manually in case? If I have not increased scshunt's VVLOP in the last 24 hours, I spend two VCs to increase eir VVLOP by 2. Thanks. Pleasure doing business. -scshunt
