Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2821a,22a assigned to ais523, Wooble, Murphy
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: c) It causes at least one Winning Condition to be satisfied, as defined by other rules. For it to be a win announcement it must cause a Winning Condition to be satisfied, but the Winning Condition can only be satisfied by a win announcement... Circularity is great.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2821a,22a assigned to ais523, Wooble, Murphy
On 07/31/2010 11:56 AM, comex wrote: On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: c) It causes at least one Winning Condition to be satisfied, as defined by other rules. For it to be a win announcement it must cause a Winning Condition to be satisfied, but the Winning Condition can only be satisfied by a win announcement... Circularity is great. Circularity is easily resolved if you stop thinking of it that way: IF NOT (IF this is a win announcement THEN someone satisfies a winning condition) THEN this is not a win announcement. -coppro
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2821a,22a assigned to ais523, Wooble, Murphy
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Circularity is easily resolved if you stop thinking of it that way: IF NOT (IF this is a win announcement THEN someone satisfies a winning condition) THEN this is not a win announcement. The proposed rule says causes, not would cause [if it were a win announcement].
