Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
Bravo!
On 10/22/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comex wrote:
> >Perhaps not, but having more Patent Titles can never be a bad thing.
>
> I hereby submit the following proposal titled "famous last words":
>
> {{{
>
> Award comex the patent title "Sorceror's Apprentice".
>
> }}}
>
> -zefram
>
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
On 10/22/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we really be encouraging speed-judging? Many CFJs merit better > treatment than that. Perhaps not, but having more Patent Titles can never be a bad thing.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
On 10/22/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Proto: > > Fastest Judge In Agora. > > Create a new rule titled "Fastest Judge In Agora" to read as follows: > > There shall be a Patent title known as the "The Fastest Judge In > Agora". Which may only be held by one player at a time. It is awarded > to a Judge who judges a CFJ quicker than any previous record. The time > measured is from the CFJ being called to the Judge publishing eir > Judgment. To count the Initiator the CotC and the Judge must all be > separate first-class persons. The Patent title shall be recorded along > with the record time. Should we really be encouraging speed-judging? Many CFJs merit better treatment than that. -root
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
Peekee wrote: >Create a new rule titled "Fastest Judge In Agora" to read as follows: Better add a "since the beginning of 2007" or similar time limit. CFJ records are incomplete. -zefram
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
Proto: Fastest Judge In Agora. Create a new rule titled "Fastest Judge In Agora" to read as follows: There shall be a Patent title known as the "The Fastest Judge In Agora". Which may only be held by one player at a time. It is awarded to a Judge who judges a CFJ quicker than any previous record. The time measured is from the CFJ being called to the Judge publishing eir Judgment. To count the Initiator the CotC and the Judge must all be separate first-class persons. The Patent title shall be recorded along with the record time. Quoting Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Zefram wrote: == CFJ 1767 == Initiated by pikhq: 21 Oct 2007 19:53:50 GMT Judge Goddess Eris assigned:21 Oct 2007 20:01:35 GMT Judged FALSE by Goddess Eris: 21 Oct 2007 20:04:29 GMT I suspect that this is our fastest ever judgement, measured from initiation. At 639 s it narrowly beats the 759 s of CFJs 1638-1645. Measured from assignment, though, the record is 0 s (set or at least tied by some CFJ earlier this month, in which you assigned it to yourself and judged it in a single message). -- Peekee
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: Measured from assignment, though, the record is 0 s (set or at least tied by some CFJ earlier this month, in which you assigned it to yourself and judged it in a single message). I don't recall doing such a thing, and I can't find it in my files. Neither can I, now I go and look. So what am I mis-remembering?
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
On Sunday 21 October 2007 17:06:38 Zefram wrote: > Josiah Worcester wrote: > >I suggest calling a CFJ on "This CFJ is the shortest one in Agoran > >history.". ;) > > It would only end up being appealed. > > -zefram > So assign yourself, amending that this is also the shortest *appeal* ever. ;)
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
Josiah Worcester wrote: >I suggest calling a CFJ on "This CFJ is the shortest one in Agoran >history.". ;) It would only end up being appealed. -zefram
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
comex wrote: >If you want to set a record, have the Pineapple Partnership call a CFJ, >assign it to yourself, and judge it all in the same message. Heh. But I don't want to set such a meaningless record. I'm much more interested in how fast our regular processes work, where initiator, CotC, and judge are usually all completely distinct. -zefram
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
On Sunday 21 October 2007 16:56:38 comex wrote: > If you want to set a record, have the Pineapple Partnership call a CFJ, > assign it to yourself, and judge it all in the same message. > I suggest calling a CFJ on "This CFJ is the shortest one in Agoran history.". ;)
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
On Sunday 21 October 2007, Zefram wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: > >Measured from assignment, though, the record is 0 s (set or at least > >tied by some CFJ earlier this month, in which you assigned it to > >yourself and judged it in a single message). > I don't recall doing such a thing, and I can't find it in my files. If you want to set a record, have the Pineapple Partnership call a CFJ, assign it to yourself, and judge it all in the same message. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
Ed Murphy wrote: >Measured from assignment, though, the record is 0 s (set or at least >tied by some CFJ earlier this month, in which you assigned it to >yourself and judged it in a single message). I don't recall doing such a thing, and I can't find it in my files. -zefram
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1767: result FALSE
Zefram wrote: == CFJ 1767 == Initiated by pikhq: 21 Oct 2007 19:53:50 GMT Judge Goddess Eris assigned:21 Oct 2007 20:01:35 GMT Judged FALSE by Goddess Eris: 21 Oct 2007 20:04:29 GMT I suspect that this is our fastest ever judgement, measured from initiation. At 639 s it narrowly beats the 759 s of CFJs 1638-1645. Measured from assignment, though, the record is 0 s (set or at least tied by some CFJ earlier this month, in which you assigned it to yourself and judged it in a single message).
