Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8178-8179
I vote FOR proposals 8178 and 8179. On 5/27/2019 4:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 6, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes). IDAuthor(s) AITitle --- 8178 Trigon 3.0 n't 8179 D Margaux, Aris 2.0 Intent is Important (v1.1) The proposal pool is currently empty. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. // ID: 8178 Title: n't Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Trigon Co-authors: In Rule 2125 'Mother, May I?': replace: "CANNOT, IMPOSSIBLE, INEFFECTIVE, INVALID" with:"CANNOT, CAN'T, IMPOSSIBLE, INEFFECTIVE, INVALID" replace: "MUST NOT, MAY NOT, SHALL NOT, ILLEGAL, PROHIBITED" with:"MUST NOT, MUSTN'T, MAY NOT, SHALL NOT, SHAN'T, ILLEGAL, PROHIBITED" replace: "NEED NOT, OPTIONAL" with:"NEED NOT, NEEDN'T, OPTIONAL" replace: "SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED" with:"SHOULD NOT, SHOULDN'T, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED" // ID: 8179 Title: Intent is Important (v1.1) Adoption index: 2.0 Author: D Margaux Co-authors: Aris [Comment: I don’t think we should be fining people for actions unless they knew or should know they are violating the rules (what the criminal law calls a “guilty mind”).] In Rule 2531, in the list that follows this text: “Any attempt to levy a fine is INEFFECTIVE if:” Add the following text as paragraph 3: “(3) the perp likely did not know and reasonably should not be expected to have known that e violated the rules as a result of the action or inaction that is the reason for the levy;” And renumber the rest of the list accordingly. //
OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8178-8179
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 6, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes). IDAuthor(s) AITitle --- 8178 Trigon 3.0 n't 8179 D Margaux, Aris 2.0 Intent is Important (v1.1) The proposal pool is currently empty. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. // ID: 8178 Title: n't Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Trigon Co-authors: In Rule 2125 'Mother, May I?': replace: "CANNOT, IMPOSSIBLE, INEFFECTIVE, INVALID" with:"CANNOT, CAN'T, IMPOSSIBLE, INEFFECTIVE, INVALID" replace: "MUST NOT, MAY NOT, SHALL NOT, ILLEGAL, PROHIBITED" with:"MUST NOT, MUSTN'T, MAY NOT, SHALL NOT, SHAN'T, ILLEGAL, PROHIBITED" replace: "NEED NOT, OPTIONAL" with:"NEED NOT, NEEDN'T, OPTIONAL" replace: "SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED" with:"SHOULD NOT, SHOULDN'T, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED" // ID: 8179 Title: Intent is Important (v1.1) Adoption index: 2.0 Author: D Margaux Co-authors: Aris [Comment: I don’t think we should be fining people for actions unless they knew or should know they are violating the rules (what the criminal law calls a “guilty mind”).] In Rule 2531, in the list that follows this text: “Any attempt to levy a fine is INEFFECTIVE if:” Add the following text as paragraph 3: “(3) the perp likely did not know and reasonably should not be expected to have known that e violated the rules as a result of the action or inaction that is the reason for the levy;” And renumber the rest of the list accordingly. //
OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette
COURT GAZETTE (Arbitor's weekly report) Disclaimer: Informational only. No actions are contained in this report. Information in this report is not self-ratifying. Open cases (CFJs) - CFJ 3726, assigned to G.: The most recent attempted imposition of the Cold Hand of Justice by Aris was effective. CFJ 3727, assigned to G.: D. Margaux has more than 0 blots. CFJ 3728, assigned to Trigon: It would be LEGAL for me [omd] to create a proposal with text 'omd violated Rule 2450 by creating this proposal' and no optional attributes. Highest numbered case: 3728 Recently-delivered Verdicts None. Day Court Judges & Recent Cases D. Margaux - No Recent Cases G. - 3726, 3727 Murphy - No Recent Cases Trigon - 3728 Weekend Court Judges & Recently Judged Cases (generally gets half as many cases) None.
OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report
I publish the below report. I CoE the below report in case I actually do have blots, and I resolve that CoE by citing the CFJ I initiated earlier today. I claim a reward of 5 coins for publishing the below report. *** Referee’s Weekly Report Date of Report: 2019-05-27 BLOT HOLDINGS === This section self-ratifies. BlotsPlayer --- 8twg 4V.J. Rada 3Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 1L. BlotsFugitive - 8Corona 4Kenyon
