OFF: [Horsened] The Horses Rundown (12 Mar 2023)
The Horsened's Weekly Report The Horses Rundown 12 Mar 2023 DOLLARIES AND HOOVES (self-ratifies) == Entity DollariesHooves --- Aced7 1011 ais523 8 4 Aspen 1011 G. 1011 Gaelan 1011 Janet 1810 juan1011 Marb1011 Murphy 4 5 nix 1411 snail7 3 Shy Owl 1011 4st 011 R. Lee 10 5 TB148011 cuddlybanana1011 omd 1011 HORSES (self-ratifies) == Horse OwnerRace Position Race Place -- - -- Alexia snail10 none Baxter Murphy 15 none Cannon snail 6 none Destructor ais5239 none Fargo Agora 4 none Nacho Agora 6 none Rubert nix 3 none Sugar snail 4 none HORSE PULLS (self-ratifies) == Horse Pulls - -- Alexia Destructor, Nacho Baxter Baxter, Destructor, Fargo Cannon Alexia, Destructor Destructor Alexia, Baxter Fargo Alexia, Destructor Nacho Alexia, Baxter, Cannon, Destructor Rubert Alexia, Cannon, Destructor Sugar Alexia, Baxter, Destructor HELMETS AND JERSEYS(does not ratify) == A: Alexia, B: Baxter, C: Cannon, D: Destructor F: Fargo, N: Nacho, R: Rubert, S: Sugar Player HELMETSJERSEYS - - ais523 AB ABC NR Murphy B B JanetR snailD N S All players not in the above list have gotten no helmets or jerseys for a horse since the race last started anew. BETS, IN DOLLARIES, SINCE RACE STARTED ANEW(does not ratify) == snail: 3 on Cannon ais523: 6 on Baxter RECENT HISTORY (does not ratify) == H: got a helmet for J: got a jersey for 12 Mar 2023: ais523 bet 3 on Baxter (has helmet) Fargo moved forward 3, pulling Alexia and Destructor 1. +1 Hooves to all players. 05 Mar 2023: snail moves Cannon 1 (Cannon's power) 05 Mar 2023: snail gains 5 dollaries by paying 3 hooves 05 Mar 2023: Murphy gets a helmet for Baxter by paying 1 hoof. 05 Mar 2023: ais523 bets 3 on Baxter (has helmet) Destructor moved forward 2, pulling Alexia and Baxter 1. +1 Hooves to all players. 26 Feb 2023: snail bought Sugar for 4 dollaries. 26 Feb 2023: Murphy gains 1 hoof 25 Feb 2023: ais523 gets a helmet for Alexia by paying 1 hoof. Sugar moved forward 2, pulling Alexia, Baxter, and Destructor 1. +1 Hooves to all players. 19 Feb 2023: snail gains 1 hoof. 19 Feb 2023: ais523 got a helmet for Baxter by paying 1 hoof. Sugar moved forward 2, pulling Alexia, Baxter, and Destructor 1. +1 Hooves to all players. Feb 12 2023: snail got a Jersey for Sugar, adding Alexia Feb 12 2023: Murphy paid 3 hooves to move Baxter 2. Feb 12 2023: ais523 gets a jersey for Baxter, adding Destructor Feb 08 2023: Murphy uses the jockey stone to move Baxter 1. Feb 06 2023: TB148 receives 7 hooves in a welcome package Feb 06 2023: R. Lee pays 3 hooves for 5 dollaries. Nacho moved forward 3, pulling Alexia,Baxter,Cannon, and Destructor 1. +1 Hooves to all players. Feb 05 2023: snail got a jersey for Nacho, adding Alexia Feb 05 2023: Murphy paid 3 hooves to move Baxter 2. Feb 05 2023: ais523 got a jersey for Nacho, adding Destructor. Feb 02 2023: R. Lee pays 3 hooves to get 5 dollaries. Jan 31 2023: R. Lee registers and gets 6 hooves from welcome package. Jan 30 2023: nix buys Rubert for 4 dollaries Destructor moved forward 1, pulling Alexia and Baxter 1. +1 Hooves to all players. 29 Jan 2023: ais523 moves Alexia back 2 using Destructor's power. 29 Jan 2023: ais523 got a jersey for Alexia, adding Destructor. 29 Jan 2023: snail gets a jersey for Destructor, adding Alexia. 29 Jan 2023: Murphy moves Baxter 2 by paying 3 hooves. 29 Jan 2023: 4st receives 5 hooves from a welcome package. Rubert moved forward 2, pulling Alexia,
OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8926-8933
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW
If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F39OHtBlZlQ8XVccqKCFtP-DPuHz4wPnujxbxkCN3LI/edit?usp=sharing
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote
collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 4, the voting method is AI-majority, and the
valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
conditional votes).
ID Author(s) AITitle
---
8926* 4st, nix3.0 Just add the sins directly
8927~ 4st, nix1.0 One More Sin
8928~ juan1.0 Acting on commitment
8929* Janet, Murphy, snail3.0 Tabled action security
8930~ nix 1.0 Rebalancing
8931~ 4st 1.0 Rhyme Time
8932~ Janet 1.0 Only so bright
8933~ Janet 1.0 Ritual ratification
The proposal pool contains the following proposals:
ID Author(s) AITitle
---
Legend: * : Democratic proposal.
~ : Ordinary proposal.
The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where
the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
the information shown above shall control.
//
ID: 8926
Title: Just add the sins directly
Adoption Index: 3.0
Author: 4st
Co-Author(s): nix
Some rules have synonyms defined (EG CFJ, intend, submit, proposer,
become) and some... don't. Yet somehow they all work based on the
'belief' that they work (like CFJs and airplanes). So the time has come
to codify it. Additionally, some doubt has come based on whether "oppose"
is sufficient to object to Agoran consent, and if other systems are
working on 'belief', then either that should be standardized, or this.
And it is of my opinion that Agorans would rather have things this way,
so...
ThUSLY, Amend R2201 ("Self-Ratification") by replacing:
"(syn. claim of error)" with "(syn. CoE, claim of error)"
AND SO, Amend R2202 ("Ratification Without Objection") by replacing:
"A player CAN, without objection, ratify a specified public document."
with:
"A player CAN, without objection, ratify a specified public document
(syn. RWO)."
//
ID: 8927
Title: One More Sin
Adoption Index: 1.0
Author: 4st
Co-Author(s): nix
Amend R1681 ("The Logical Rulesets") by appending the following:
"Generally, R[N] is shorthand for Rule [N]."
//
ID: 8928
Title: Acting on commitment
Adoption Index: 1.0
Author: juan
Co-Author(s):
Enact a rule with power=1.0 entitled "Acting on commitment" with text:
{
A Fingerprint for a document (the Plaintext) is a document that could
not have been reasonably created without knowledge of the Plaintext, and
which is related to the Plaintext in such a way that one could not
reasonably produce another document related to that Fingerprint in the
same way.
Where the rules define an action that a person CAN perform "by
commitment" to a particular kind of document, that person performs
that action by performing it by announcement while, in the same
message, also publishing a what is purportedly a Fingerprint for a
document of that kind.
}
//
ID: 8929
Title: Tabled action security
Adoption Index: 3.0
Author: Janet
Co-Author(s): Murphy, snail
Amend Rule 2124 ("Performing Tabled Actions") by deleting the list item
containing "Cease to be a" and by inserting the following after the
first paragraph:
{
A supporter/objector to an intent, acting as emself, CAN by announcement
cease to be a supporter/objector ("withdraw" support/objection) of that
intent.
Limiting the ability to support or object to an intent is secured at the
power of the rule enabling that action to be performed.
}
//
ID: 8930
Title: Rebalancing
Adoption Index: 1.0
Author: nix
Co-Author(s): Murphy, snail
[Little buff to CFJs and nerf to Proposals, now that proposals have
become very common. Wording should work with current version or
Radiance.]
Amend R2657 by replacing:
"Being the author of a proposal that takes effect: 5"
with:
"Being the author of a proposal that takes effect: 4"
and replacing:
"Judging a CFJ that e was assigned to without violating a time
limit to do so, unless at the time of judgement the case was open due to
self-filing a motion to reconsider it: 2"
with:
"Judging a CFJ that e was assigned to without violating a time
limit to do so, unless at the time
OFF: [ADoP] Metareport
=Metareport= You can find an up-to-date version of this report at http://zenith.homelinux.net/adop/report.php Date of last report: 2023-03-05 Date of this report: 2023-03-12 MISCELLANEOUS INFO Filled offices: 19/19 (100.00%) Total officers: 8 Consolidation[1]: 2.38 Late reports: 1/15 (6.67%) [1] This is the number of filled offices divided by the number of officers. At 1, this means that all offices are filled by different players; if it reached the number of filled offices, that would mean that all offices are filled by one player. OFFICES Office Holder[1]Since Last Election Complexity ADoP Murphy 2020-07-032022-10-091 Arbitor G. 2022-10-092023-01-152 Assessor ~ Janet2019-07-092022-07-243 Collector *nix 2022-10-23(never) 1 Distributor omd 2018-06-15(never)[3]0 Dream Keeper snail2022-12-11(never) 1 Herald ~*nix 2022-10-172022-07-242 Horsened snail2022-08-14(never) 1 Mad Engineer Janet2022-06-17(ongoing) 1 Notary snail2022-03-142023-01-152 Prime Minister nix 2023-02-022023-02-260 Promotor snail2022-05-012023-01-153 Referee *4st 2023-02-062023-01-012 Registrarjuan 2022-08-292022-10-021 Rulekeepor Janet2019-12-062022-10-093 Speaker Janet2023-03-062019-11-05 [3]0 Stonemason Janet2020-11-11(never) 1 Tailor Murphy 2021-02-282022-10-091 Webmastor ~*4st 2023-02-062022-08-141 [1] * = Interim office (vacant or holder not elected) ~ = Term limited (held for 180+ days, 90+ for Prime Minister) [2] Vacant since this date [3] Currently imposed WEEKLY REPORTS Office ReportLast Published Late[1] ADoP Offices 2023-03-05[2] Arbitor Judicial matters 2023-03-10 CollectorStamps2023-03-06 Dream Keeper Dreams2023-03-06 Herald Scores2023-03-06 Horsened Horses2023-03-05 Mad Engineer The Device2023-03-12 Notary Contracts 2023-02-12 !!! Promotor Proposal pool 2023-03-05 Referee Rule violations 2023-03-07 RegistrarPlayers, Fora 2023-03-06 Rulekeepor Short Logical Ruleset 2023-03-12 Stonemason Stones2023-03-05 [1] ! = 1 period missed, !! = 2, !!! = 3+ (does not take succumbing into account) [2] Not including this report MONTHLY REPORTS Office ReportLast Published Late Herald Patent titles 2023-02-06 RegistrarPlayer history2023-03-01 Rulekeepor Full Logical Ruleset 2023-03-12 Tailor Ribbons, Laudability 2023-03-05 WebmastorWeb resources 2023-02-06 ELECTIONS Office Initiated Phase Candidates Mad Engineer 2023-02-14 Voting 4st, Janet UPCOMING ELECTIONS[1] Office Days Until Last Election Assessor 00 Days 2022-07-24 Herald 00 Days 2022-07-24 Webmastor00 Days 2022-08-14 Registrar00 Days 2022-10-02 ADoP 00 Days 2022-10-09 [1] Anyone can start an election (with 2 support and also becoming a candidate) 90 days after the previous one (or if it's interim and no election is ongoing). This section shows the 5 elected offices with the most time passed since the last election. Once a quarter, the ADoP SHALL start an
OFF: [ADoP] Mad Engineer voting
I hereby initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Mad Engineer election. The Vote Collector is the ADoP, the valid options are 4st and Janet (and anyone else who becomes a candidate before voting closes), the voting method is instant runoff, and quorum is 4 (based on 6 voters on Proposal 8921).
OFF: [Mad Engineer] Experiment 00076 - Intent to Invent
MAD ENGINEER'S WEEKLY REPORT
The Device is off.
EXPERIMENT 00076 INTENT TO INVENT
I intend, with Agoran consent, to cause Rule 2655 to amend the Rule "The
Device" by appending the following a a list item to the "When the device
is on:" list:
{
If multiple rules attempt to define an device with the same name,
then they refer to the same device. A rule-defined entity's name
CANNOT be changed to be the same as another rule-defined device's
name.
}
OFF: [Mad Engineer] Experiment 00076 - Rule Selection
EXPERIMENT 00076 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 1586
("Definition and Continuity of Entities"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking
that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions if you have them!
The text of Rule 1586 is reproduced below for convenience:
Rule 1586/9 (Power=2)
Definition and Continuity of Entities
If multiple rules attempt to define an entity with the same name,
then they refer to the same entity. A rule-defined entity's name
CANNOT be changed to be the same as another rule-defined entity's
name.
A rule, contract, or regulation that refers to an entity by name
refers to the entity that had that name when the rule first came
to include that reference, even if the entity's name has since
changed.
If the entity that defines another entity is amended such that it
no longer defines the second entity, then the second entity and
its attributes cease to exist.
If the entity that defines another entity is amended such that it
defines the second entity both before and after the amendment, but
with different attributes, then the second entity and its
attributes continue to exist to whatever extent is possible under
the new definitions.
