Oops, didn't finish the subject. This message contains no game actions.
On 5/2/24 02:41, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 9096-9101
> =================================
>
> ID Title Result
> ----------------------------------------------
> 9096 Stone cleanups v3 REJECTED
> 9097 Festival strength restrictions ADOPTED
> 9098 Welcome Spendies ADOPTED
> 9099 Quantum Superstone REJECTED
> 9100 Spending Stone REJECTED
> 9101 Unstable Stone REJECTED
>
> I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals.
>
> The quorum for all below decisions was 7.
>
> VOTING STRENGTHS
> ================
>
> Strength is 3 unless otherwise noted.
> #: player has voting strength 3
> $: player has voting strength 4
> %: player has voting strength 5
> ^: player has voting strength 6
>
> PROPOSALS
> =========
>
> PROPOSAL 9096 (Stone cleanups v3)
> AUTHOR: Janet
> CLASS: ORDINARY
> FOR (3): Jaff, snail^, wunst
> AGAINST (3): Janet^, Murphy%, nix%
> PRESENT (1): juan$
> BALLOTS: 7
> AI (F/A): 12/16 (AI=2.0)
> POPULARITY: 0.000
> OUTCOME: REJECTED
> [
> Janet: Endorsement of nix
> Murphy: Janet is the Stonemason: Endorsement of Janet
> ]
>
> PROPOSAL 9097 (Festival strength restrictions)
> AUTHOR: Janet
> CLASS: DEMOCRATIC
> FOR (6): Jaff, Janet, Murphy, nix, snail, wunst
> AGAINST (0):
> PRESENT (1): juan
> BALLOTS: 7
> AI (F/A): 18/0 (AI=3.0)
> POPULARITY: 0.857
> OUTCOME: ADOPTED
> [
> snail: Endorsement of Janet
> ]
>
> PROPOSAL 9098 (Welcome Spendies)
> AUTHOR: snail
> CLASS: ORDINARY
> FOR (7): Jaff, Janet^, Murphy%, juan$, nix%, snail^, wunst
> AGAINST (0):
> PRESENT (0):
> BALLOTS: 7
> AI (F/A): 32/0 (AI=1.0)
> POPULARITY: 1.000
> OUTCOME: ADOPTED
>
> PROPOSAL 9099 (Quantum Superstone)
> AUTHOR: snail
> CLASS: ORDINARY
> FOR (2): snail^, wunst
> AGAINST (3): Jaff, Janet^, Murphy%
> PRESENT (2): juan$, nix%
> BALLOTS: 7
> AI (F/A): 9/14 (AI=2.0)
> POPULARITY: -0.143
> OUTCOME: REJECTED
> [
> Murphy: Janet is the Stonemason: Endorsement of Janet
> ]
>
> PROPOSAL 9100 (Spending Stone)
> AUTHOR: snail
> CLASS: ORDINARY
> FOR (1): snail^
> AGAINST (4): Janet^, Murphy%, nix%, wunst
> PRESENT (2): Jaff, juan$
> BALLOTS: 7
> AI (F/A): 6/19 (AI=2.0)
> POPULARITY: -0.429
> OUTCOME: REJECTED
> [
> Murphy: Janet is the Stonemason: Endorsement of Janet
> ]
>
> PROPOSAL 9101 (Unstable Stone)
> AUTHOR: snail
> CLASS: ORDINARY
> FOR (2): snail^, wunst
> AGAINST (2): Janet^, Murphy%
> PRESENT (3): Jaff, juan$, nix%
> BALLOTS: 7
> AI (F/A): 9/11 (AI=2.0)
> POPULARITY: 0.000
> OUTCOME: REJECTED
> [
> Murphy: Janet is the Stonemason: Endorsement of Janet
> ]
>
> The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below:
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 9097
> Title: Festival strength restrictions
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Janet
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2481 ("Festival Restrictions") by replacing "Each Festive
> player has the maximum possible voting strength. All other players have
> the minimum possible voting strength." with "Each Festive player has the
> maximum possible voting strength. Each person who is not a Festive
> player has the minimum possible voting strength. Rules to the contrary
> notwithstanding, no modifications to voting strength (other than
> defining the maximum and minimum) are applied by any other Rule.".
>
> [Clarify that setting strength to the maximum/minimum cannot then be
> altered with Blots or bonuses, since it's currently unclear whether the
> method of calculation in R2422 applies. Additionally, don't allow
> non-Festive players to escape the penalty by deregistering.]
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 9098
> Title: Welcome Spendies
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: snail
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2499 (Welcome Packages) by replacing
>
> {
> * One stamp of eir own type.
> }
>
> with
>
> {
> * One stamp of eir own type.
> * 10 spendies, if e has not been granted any spendies since e last
> registered.
> }
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
