PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 3, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes).
ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8549& Aris, Gaelan, G. 2.2 You Can Only Stack Turtles So High 8550& Aris, nix 2.2 I Want My Promise Back! 8551& G. 1.0 something to vote on 8552& Jason, ais523 1.0 Apathy for all 8553& Jason 1.0 Slightly less apathetic The proposal pool is currently empty. Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. <ID>& : Ordinary proposal. <ID>~ : Unsponsored proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8549 Title: You Can Only Stack Turtles So High Author: Aris Co-authors: Gaelan, G. Adoption index: 2.2 [This fixes G.'s scam, which would otherwise allow indeterminacy to be created through infinite promise loops.] Amend Rule 2618, "Promises", by inserting, after the text: A promise's bearer CAN, by announcement, cash the promise, provided that any conditions for cashing it specified by its text are unambiguously met. By doing so, e acts on the creator of the promise's behalf, causing the creator to act as if e published the promise's text, and destroys the promise. the text: However, to limit recursion, no promise can be cashed during the execution of another promise unless it existed before the execution of that promise began. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8550 Title: I Want My Promise Back! Author: Aris Co-authors: nix Adoption index: 2.2 [This is intended to remove the need to put in a special provision to a promise allow the creator to destroy a promise in the possession of the Library. Since that's usually what's wanted, this makes it the default behavior, while still allowing the creator to override it.] Amend Rule 2618, "Promises", by inserting, after the text: The Library is an entity and CAN own promises. Any player CAN take a specified promise from the Library by announcement, provided e cashes the promise in the same message. the text: The creator of a promise CAN take or revoke it from the Library by announcement, unless the promise's text unambiguously designates it as irrevocable. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8551 Title: I Want My Promise Back! Author: Aris Co-authors: nix Adoption index: 2.2 The player who voted unambiguously FOR, and had the highest unique[*] voting strength (at the end of the voting period) on, the decision to adopt this proposal is hereby granted **** 1 Victory Card ***** [* "Highest unique" means if the top two are 15 and the next highest is 14, and no one else is at 14, the 14 wins]. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8552 Title: Apathy for all Author: Jason Co-authors: ais523 Adoption index: 1.0 Amend Rule 2465 by replacing, as a single amendment, the text "set of players" with "set of persons" and the text "specified players" with "specified persons". ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8553 Title: Slightly less apathetic Author: Jason Co-authors: Adoption index: 1.0 Amend Rule 2465, "Victory by Apathy", by replacing the final "." character with the following: ", except for those who have won the game through this Rule in the past 14 days." //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////