PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F39OHtBlZlQ8XVccqKCFtP-DPuHz4wPnujxbxkCN3LI/edit?usp=sharing I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 4, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes). ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8926* 4st, nix 3.0 Just add the sins directly 8927~ 4st, nix 1.0 One More Sin 8928~ juan 1.0 Acting on commitment 8929* Janet, Murphy, snail 3.0 Tabled action security 8930~ nix 1.0 Rebalancing 8931~ 4st 1.0 Rhyme Time 8932~ Janet 1.0 Only so bright 8933~ Janet 1.0 Ritual ratification The proposal pool contains the following proposals: ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. <ID>~ : Ordinary proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8926 Title: Just add the sins directly Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: 4st Co-Author(s): nix Some rules have synonyms defined (EG CFJ, intend, submit, proposer, become) and some... don't. Yet somehow they all work based on the 'belief' that they work (like CFJs and airplanes). So the time has come to codify it. Additionally, some doubt has come based on whether "oppose" is sufficient to object to Agoran consent, and if other systems are working on 'belief', then either that should be standardized, or this. And it is of my opinion that Agorans would rather have things this way, so... ThUSLY, Amend R2201 ("Self-Ratification") by replacing: "(syn. claim of error)" with "(syn. CoE, claim of error)" AND SO, Amend R2202 ("Ratification Without Objection") by replacing: "A player CAN, without objection, ratify a specified public document." with: "A player CAN, without objection, ratify a specified public document (syn. RWO)." ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8927 Title: One More Sin Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: 4st Co-Author(s): nix Amend R1681 ("The Logical Rulesets") by appending the following: "Generally, R[N] is shorthand for Rule [N]." ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8928 Title: Acting on commitment Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: juan Co-Author(s): Enact a rule with power=1.0 entitled "Acting on commitment" with text: { A Fingerprint for a document (the Plaintext) is a document that could not have been reasonably created without knowledge of the Plaintext, and which is related to the Plaintext in such a way that one could not reasonably produce another document related to that Fingerprint in the same way. Where the rules define an action that a person CAN perform "by commitment" to a particular kind of document, that person performs that action by performing it by announcement while, in the same message, also publishing a what is purportedly a Fingerprint for a document of that kind. } ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8929 Title: Tabled action security Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: Janet Co-Author(s): Murphy, snail Amend Rule 2124 ("Performing Tabled Actions") by deleting the list item containing "Cease to be a" and by inserting the following after the first paragraph: { A supporter/objector to an intent, acting as emself, CAN by announcement cease to be a supporter/objector ("withdraw" support/objection) of that intent. Limiting the ability to support or object to an intent is secured at the power of the rule enabling that action to be performed. } ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8930 Title: Rebalancing Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: nix Co-Author(s): Murphy, snail [Little buff to CFJs and nerf to Proposals, now that proposals have become very common. Wording should work with current version or Radiance.] Amend R2657 by replacing: "Being the author of a proposal that takes effect: 5" with: "Being the author of a proposal that takes effect: 4" and replacing: "Judging a CFJ that e was assigned to without violating a time limit to do so, unless at the time of judgement the case was open due to self-filing a motion to reconsider it: 2" with: "Judging a CFJ that e was assigned to without violating a time limit to do so, unless at the time of judgement the case was open due to self-filing a motion to reconsider it: 3" ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8931 Title: Rhyme Time Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: 4st Co-Author(s): Enact a rule entitled "Rhyme Time" at power=1: { Now what this rule will do Is enumerable by two. One of which, you will find, is that this rule must near-rhyme. The first of which is already done, Now near-rhyme on new rules of power 1. } ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8932 Title: Only so bright Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: Janet Co-Author(s): Amend Rule 2657 by replacing "Each time a player fulfills a radiance condition, e CAN once by announcement" with "Each time a player fulfills a radiance condition, e CAN once, within 14 days, by announcement". ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8933 Title: Ritual Ratification Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: Janet Co-Author(s): Amend Rule 2680 by replacing "Declared ritual numbers are self-ratifying." with "A purported attempt to declare the ritual number is a self-ratifying attestation that such attempt was successful and that the ritual number was declared." ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// -- snail
