RES: AI-GEOSTATS: Dealing with Universal Kriging

2002-04-11 Thread Rubens Caldeira Monteiro


Thanks you all for your contributions.

Rubens


--
* To post a message to the list, send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* As a general service to the users, please remember to post a summary of any useful 
responses to your questions.
* To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no subject and "unsubscribe 
ai-geostats" followed by "end" on the next line in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
* Support to the list is provided at http://www.ai-geostats.org



RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Dealing with Universal Kriging

2002-04-10 Thread Isobel Clark

Alessandro

Thanks for the contribution. 

If Universal Kriging is applied, there is no need for
simulation or multi-indicator approaches to get a
standard error, it comes with the solution.

Isobel

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

--
* To post a message to the list, send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* As a general service to the users, please remember to post a summary of any useful 
responses to your questions.
* To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no subject and "unsubscribe 
ai-geostats" followed by "end" on the next line in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
* Support to the list is provided at http://www.ai-geostats.org



Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Dealing with Universal Kriging

2002-04-09 Thread Isobel Clark

Rubens 

Your approach has been long used in hydrology and
similar fields with much success.

The problem with the standard deviation is that it
does not include the the 'error' on the estimation of
the true drift. To get a composite error you would
either have to 

(a) add your kriging variance to some sort of
classical regression variance to get a composite one;

(b) use a Universal Kriging (or generalised
covariance) approach to estimate the surface with the
drift included.

In our experience, your estimated surface will not
change but your kriging variances will increase
slightly.

Isobel Clark

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

--
* To post a message to the list, send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* As a general service to the users, please remember to post a summary of any useful 
responses to your questions.
* To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no subject and "unsubscribe 
ai-geostats" followed by "end" on the next line in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
* Support to the list is provided at http://www.ai-geostats.org



AI-GEOSTATS: Dealing with Universal Kriging

2002-04-09 Thread Rubens Caldeira Monteiro








Dear all,

 

We
are trying to apply Universal Kriging to “High
Plains” Aquifer in Kansas (OLEA, 1999) for land surface elevation (LSE),
using its 317 data points. The purpose of this application is just for didactic
ends.

Our
first step was to filter a prominent 1st degree drift. The way we
did it was using Surfer 8.0 (Golden Software) and obtaining the residuals, in
such way that summing the residuals by the 1st degree trend we
obtain the original data.

Obviously
the values of this new variable (residuals of LSE, i.e., RLSE) are much lower
than the original one.

Calculating
the experimental variogram, modeling it and kriging the variable is possible to obtain the RLSE
(residuals of land surface elevation) map. Summing this map to the drift (calculated
in a deterministic way) we obtain a map that we suppose that represents a map
for the original variable (LSE).

But what about the standard deviation?

We
did a little test and it seems that the standard deviation map for the
residuals (RLSE) represents the std. dev. map for the original variable (LSE).

 

Is
this a correct conclusion and procedure? If we have less data, will it work? If
we use a 2nd degree drift the standard deviation could be wrong?

 

Thanks
for your attention,

 

Rubens

 

==

Rubens Caldeira
Monteiro

# ICQ 106157533

São Paulo State
University at Rio Claro  - UNESP/Rio Claro

– PhD candidate
on Geosciences & Environmental Sci.

São Paulo University at Piracicaba - ESALQ-USP/Piracicaba

– Undergrad. on Environmental Management

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - UNC-CH

URL: http://www.unc.edu/~rubenscm/CASEhome.html