AI-GEOSTATS: geostat for alluvial deposit

2010-10-13 Thread M. Nur Heriawan
Dear list,

I need references about the application of geostatistics for the resources 
estimation of alluvial and placer deposits. If someone in the list has 
experiences about it, could you please share it? As you might know 
that alluvial 
deposits i.e. gold or tin has very high variability in the lateral direction, 
so 
the resources classification based on the variogram range is seemed to be not 
appropriate. Anyway, when we used the kriging standard deviation for resources 
classification, the result was seemed to be not reliable.  
 
Thank you for any suggestions.

Best regards,---
M. Nur Heriawan
Earth Resources Exploration Research Group
Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)
Jl. Ganesha 10 Bandung 40132 INDONESIA
http://www.mining.itb.ac.id/heriawan 



  

+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no subject and 
"unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any 
useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/


Re: AI-GEOSTATS: geostat for alluvial deposit

2010-10-14 Thread seba

Hi
Not too much experience with gold deposits but I have some idea.
First I think that you need to perform the analysis in a transformed 
coordinate system
( a river centered one). In this way you will able to handle easily 
the anisotropy of the variogram.

Then, probably you need, to follow a local kriging approach.
Bye
Sebastiano

At 09:06 AM 10/13/2010, M. Nur Heriawan wrote:

Dear list,

I need references about the application of geostatistics for the resources
estimation of alluvial and placer deposits. If someone in the list has
experiences about it, could you please share it? As you might know 
that alluvial
deposits i.e. gold or tin has very high variability in the lateral 
direction, so

the resources classification based on the variogram range is seemed to be not
appropriate. Anyway, when we used the kriging standard deviation for 
resources

classification, the result was seemed to be not reliable.

Thank you for any suggestions.

Best regards,---
M. Nur Heriawan
Earth Resources Exploration Research Group
Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)
Jl. Ganesha 10 Bandung 40132 INDONESIA
http://www.mining.itb.ac.id/heriawan





+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no 
subject and "unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body. DO NOT 
SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a 
summary of any useful responses to your questions.

+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/



+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no subject and 
"unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any 
useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/