Re: [ai-geostats] Re: Correlogram estimate

2004-12-18 Thread Edzer J. Pebesma

Isobel Clark wrote:
Jack
I find Edzer notation confusing, since evryone I know
uses C0 for the bugget effect not the total sill of
the semi-variogram model.
You are right, Isobel; I should have written C(0) to
denote the sill variance, where the covariogram is written
as C(h).
--
Edzer
PS -- what was that bugget? :-)
* By using the ai-geostats mailing list you agree to follow its rules 
( see http://www.ai-geostats.org/help_ai-geostats.htm )

* To unsubscribe to ai-geostats, send the following in the subject or in the 
body (plain text format) of an email message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Signoff ai-geostats

Re: [ai-geostats] Re: Correlogram estimate

2004-12-18 Thread Isobel Clark
 Edzer
 
 PS -- what was that bugget? :-)
Sorry, keyboard a bit congested ;-)

nugget effect C0, total sill C(0)!

Isobel

* By using the ai-geostats mailing list you agree to follow its rules 
( see http://www.ai-geostats.org/help_ai-geostats.htm )

* To unsubscribe to ai-geostats, send the following in the subject or in the 
body (plain text format) of an email message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Signoff ai-geostats