Re: [algogeeks] Re: Finding the repeated element
@deepikaanand (checksum 1 100) will it work ? as i know int has only 32 bits !! Thanks Regards Saurabh Yadav -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
Re: [algogeeks] Microsoft Interview Question
+1 Ashish solution -- Thanks Regards Saurabh Yadav -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
Re: [algogeeks] Microsoft Interview Question
@shiv relate the ashish solution with quick sort then you will understand easily On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Saurabh Yadav saurabh...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Ashish solution -- Thanks Regards Saurabh Yadav -- Thanks Regards Saurabh Yadav -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
Re: [algogeeks] standard puzzle
question is incomplete , mention the conditions please On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:44 AM, HARSHIT PAHUJA hpahuja.mn...@gmail.comwrote: There are 10 coins in a bag. 3 coin weights x kg 3 coins weights y kg 2 coins weights z kg 2 coins weights w kg You have to separate them into separate heaps according to their weights. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. -- Thanks Regards Saurabh Yadav -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
Re: [algogeeks] first Repeating character in a string
order of hashing and counting is important eg. abba if we do hashing by characters 'a' is stored before 'b' and count of both is 2 at the end and when we process this we give result 'a' (because 'a' comes before 'b' )which is wrong because 'b' is the first repeated character. Thanks Regards Saurabh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
Re: [algogeeks] first Repeating character in a string
i was explaining the general idea which we generally use with hashing i.e. hashing and counting the all the char and then find which is the repeated character yes u r correct , for the correct solution we should return when we found bitmap set , which is the actual solution :) On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:58 PM, partha sarathi Mohanty partha.mohanty2...@gmail.com wrote: @saurabh: why would u count all??? just see while counting if the bitmap is set.. then return the char. On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Saurabh Yadav saurabh...@gmail.comwrote: order of hashing and counting is important eg. abba if we do hashing by characters 'a' is stored before 'b' and count of both is 2 at the end and when we process this we give result 'a' (because 'a' comes before 'b' )which is wrong because 'b' is the first repeated character. Thanks Regards Saurabh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. -- Thanks Regards Saurabh Yadav -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
Re: [algogeeks] Sorting in O(n)
+1 mithun kumar !! using bit array or bitmap index gives the best solution ( O(n) ) the only limitation is we should know the maximum limit of the number, which is provided in this problem :D Thanks Regards Saurabh Yadav -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
Re: [algogeeks] JAVA: Print all paths from root to leaf
+1 @atul anand
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:31 PM, atul anand atul.87fri...@gmail.comwrote:
@Mihir : actually you are using linked listso you are keep on adding
the nodes but not removing it..hence...you are getting wrong output..
i guess this should be done to fix the code.
public static void paths(Node node, LinkedListInteger list) {
if(node == null) return;
list.add(node.data);
if(node.left == null node.right == null) {
print(list);
}
else {
paths(node.left, list);
* removeLastNodefromLinkedList();*
paths(node.right, list);
* removeLastNodefromLinkedList();*
}
r*emoveLastNodefromLinkedList();*
}
public static void print(LinkedListInteger list) {
System.out.println(Contents of list: + list);
}
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Mihir Kulkarni mihirk...@gmail.comwrote:
I only intend to print the root to leaf paths. The correct output should
be:
721
725
It works fine when I use array instead of LinkedList.
cheers,
Mihir Kulkarni
Graduate Student
University of California, Irvine
http://goo.gl/CvRcG
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Rujin Cao drizzle...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the correct output 7 2 1 5 ?
Did you intend to print the leaf node ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
--
Thanks Regards
Saurabh Yadav
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
Re: [algogeeks] someone pls explain the o/p??
may be because when you compare unsigned number with signed number ,the signed will changed to unsigned type and when signed will changed to unsigned type, it's MSB is one ,so y will be greater than x i am not sure about the reason i gave !! On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ashish Sachdeva ashish.asachd...@gmail.com wrote: http://ideone.com/Ily5v -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. -- Thanks Regards Saurabh Yadav -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
Re: [algogeeks] spell check
check this blog http://nlpb.blogspot.com/2011/01/spell-checker.html On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Ravi Ranjan ravi.cool2...@gmail.comwrote: i wanna write the spell check function like when we put some word with spelling mistake then it tell the most suitable word matching to it( green error line of spelling in MS-Word) i used levenshtein distance algorithm to find the subset from the dictionary but it is a linear search... and takes much.. so is there any other data structure or approach to solve the problem to reduce complexity... or levenshtein distance algorithm can be used in some other way -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. -- Thanks Regards Saurabh Yadav -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
