Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#35805] Deletion Request for tio-git

2022-06-24 Thread Nick Østergaard via aur-requests
I don't think this needs to be deleted. Yes, you started to make
many releases with is good, but I still think there is a place for
this package as a convenience.

1.40 released this 7 days ago · 13 commits to master since this release

local/tio-git 1.40.r13.g941e8d5-1

On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 01:39,  wrote:
>
> lundmar [1] filed a deletion request for tio-git [2]:
>
> I don't think a git version is needed as tio is quite often updated
> with official releases.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/lundmar/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tio-git/


Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#15014] Orphan Request for liblxi-git

2019-05-23 Thread Nick Østergaard via aur-requests
This is not correct. It is being maintained, this should not be orphaned.

On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 20:07,  wrote:
>
> marker5a [1] filed a orphan request for liblxi-git [2]:
>
> PKGBUILD needs updated dependency and not being maintained
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/marker5a/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/liblxi-git/


Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#13782] Orphan Request for kicad-git

2019-01-12 Thread Nick Østergaard via aur-requests
No, this is wrong! I just pushed an update. Also I did reply to you
instantly. There is nothing wrong with discussing things first.

Also, there is not reason in changing thing without reasoning and testing
when what is available works.

On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 at 14:33,  wrote:

> GPereira [1] filed a orphan request for kicad-git [2]:
>
> Maintainer actively refuses to bring the package to a working
> condition without giving any reason to do so.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/GPereira/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kicad-git/


Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#12823] Orphan Request for slic3r Accepted

2018-10-26 Thread Nick Østergaard via aur-requests
I don't think it is fair to orphan this as  GPereira didn't respond to
my comment:

slic3r.desktop

Add Comment

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

swiftgeek commented on 2018-09-28 23:49

Few icons and a bit of perl scripts that implement gui that are not
executed is not overhead

nickoe commented on 2018-09-28 17:35

@GPereia, do you have a patch?

GPereira commented on 2018-09-28 16:41

it shouldn't install the gui components in that case, to minimize overhead
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 14:17,  wrote:
>
> Request #12823 has been accepted by coderobe [1].
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/coderobe/