[sc-issues] [Issue 5930] Engineering Notation

2010-08-01 Thread crugdeon
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5930





--- Additional comments from crugd...@openoffice.org Sun Aug  1 10:07:22 
+ 2010 ---
Dear larsnooden, i wonder if you read the comments and made yourself familiar
with the subject at all. I am unable to replicate an engineering notation with
the number you provided. I am using Openoffice 3.2.1 build 9502. The number
1230 with the Format 0,00E+000 which displays an exponent with a multiple of
3 as expected 1,23E+003 but choosing 12300 yields 1,23E+004 which is not a
multiple of 3.

I am currently unable to see how the current scientific notation solves the
clearly stated need for a notation, that will display the decimal exponent in a
multiple of 3 without requiring user activity by creating for example a macro to
alter the numeric display.

See
* Additional comments from brusque Thu Mar 16 10:50:06 
* Additional comments from jhhsj Tue Dec 11 21:23:12
* alastair_paton Tue Sep 8 22:55:17 + 2009 


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org



[sc-issues] [Issue 24373] Engineering and SI/MKSA no tation support for Calc

2010-03-29 Thread crugdeon
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=24373





--- Additional comments from crugd...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 29 09:58:11 
+ 2010 ---
In issue 5930 alastair_paton gave a clear argument why this issue is rather a
dependant than a duplicate for 5930.

--- Additional comments from alastair_paton Tue Sep 8 22:55:17 + 2009
---
quote
Back in 2004 two separate requirements were blurred together within this issue
and I believe that 
blurring has hindered engineering notation in gaining appropriate implementation
priority.

The two [blurred] issues are:

A. Engineering Notation, and

B. SI Prefixes.

A. ENGINEERING NOTATION

The requirement for engineering notation was well articulated on 17 Jun 02 by
the initiating post for 
this this issue [5930, Engineering Notation].

The only thing I would add is Engineering notation is a version of scientific
notation [Ref: Wikipedia 
article on Engineering Notation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineering_notation ] as this may help in 
the implementation of engineering notation.

B. SI PREFIXES

On 14 Jan 04 [24373, Engineering and SI/MKSA notation support for Calc] was
raised, and 9 hours 
later it was deemed to be a duplicate of [5930, Engineering Notation].

I disagree with this assessment as they are are not the same issue, nor a double
of the same issue.

[24373, Engineering and SI/MKSA notation support for Calc] does describe a
requirement, and that is 
for SI Prefix, viz, An SI prefix is a name or associated symbol that precedes a
basic unit of measure 
[Ref: Wikipedia article on SI Prefix http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Si_prefix ].

/qote

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org