[sc-issues] [Issue 67412] slow adjusting of row heig ht when loading ods spreadsheet
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67412 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Sat Jan 1 13:55:14 + 2011 --- Annoying is that this height recalculation happens on various occasions during saving, some other editor tasks, so it should be come a bug i.s.o. enhancement. It makes Calc unusable. It goes away when I disable 'wrap text automaticly', but that is not handsome when one has large texts in one column... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 115941] Copy/Move row does not pr eserver range references in function well.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115941 Issue #|115941 Summary|Copy/Move row does not preserver range references in f |unction well. Component|Spreadsheet Version|OOo 3.3 RC7 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|spreadsheet Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 6 11:00:19 + 2010 --- When I have a formula on a row like 'B11-SUM($B$2:B11)' and I copy/move the row with Ctrl-Alt / Alt and mouse, the range is not well preserved and the row above the target location is also effected. The result becomes like 'B12-SUM($B$2-B13)' Note the difference between B12 and B13. The latter should also read B12. See attached Writer document with detailed instructions and screen-shots. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 115941] Copy/Move row does not pr eserver range references in function well.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115941 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 6 11:03:25 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=75246) Issue reproduction description - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 111390] OOo Calc 3.0.1 and higher -- Notes bug
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111390 User eremmel changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'brinzing,rainerbielefeld'|'brinzing,eremmel,rainerbi | |elefeld' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 111390] OOo Calc 3.0.1 and higher -- Notes bug
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111390 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Nov 8 12:43:30 + 2010 --- Despite the speed improvements for hidden notes I observed t extreme performance degradation when having a sheet with lots of hidden notes This is during loading, saving and a generic change to apply e.g. default formatting (Ctrl-M). In the case when I select the sheet and change all the rowhight for all the rows at once the csrss.exe (Windows XP SP3) goes to 80% and OOo takes the rest. One thread of OOo consumes all this time. I sampled a few thread stack traces with process explorer from www.sysinternals.com a saw all the time the following stack trace: ntkrnlpa.exe+0x6e9eb ntkrnlpa.exe+0x2bf8c hal.dll+0x2ef2 hal.dll+0x2427 win32k.sys+0x434cb win32k.sys+0x524b7 win32k.sys+0x537f5 win32k.sys+0x79f0 win32k.sys+0x7a58 win32k.sys+0x153233 win32k.sys+0x14a074 ntkrnlpa.exe+0x6a64c ntdll.dll!KiFastSystemCallRet vclmi.dll!component_writeInfo+0xed73 vclmi.dll!SalLayout::GetBoundRect+0x47 vclmi.dll!OutputDevice::GetTextBoundRect+0xe3 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::TextLayouterDevice::getTextBoundRect+0x51 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::TextSimplePortionPrimitive2D::getB2DRange+0xb6 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DReference+0x54 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DSequence+0x46 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::BasePrimitive2D::getB2DRange+0x28 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DReference+0x54 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DSequence+0x46 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::BasePrimitive2D::getB2DRange+0x28 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DReference+0x54 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DSequence+0x46 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::BasePrimitive2D::getB2DRange+0x28 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DReference+0x54 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DSequence+0x46 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::BasePrimitive2D::getB2DRange+0x28 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DReference+0x54 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DSequence+0x46 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::BasePrimitive2D::getB2DRange+0x28 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DReference+0x54 drawinglayermi.dll!drawinglayer::primitive2d::getB2DRangeFromPrimitive2DSequence+0x46 svxcoremi.dll!SdrObject::RecalcBoundRect+0x8d svxcoremi.dll!SdrObject::GetCurrentBoundRect+0x1a scmi.dll!ScPostIt::CreateCaptionFromInitData+0x68 scmi.dll!ScPostIt::GetOrCreateCaption+0xe scmi.dll!ScTable::GetRowHeight+0x2107 scmi.dll!ScDocument::HasValueData+0x167 scmi.dll!ScTabView::RefreshZoom+0x5240 scmi.dll!ScExpandedFixedText::~ScExpandedFixedText+0x3dcde scmi.dll!ScExpandedFixedText::~ScExpandedFixedText+0x3c0da scmi.dll!ScExpandedFixedText::~ScExpandedFixedText+0x3d344 vclmi.dll!Window::EndTracking+0xdc vclmi.dll!Window::LinkStubImplAsyncFocusHdl+0xf12 vclmi.dll!Window::LinkStubImplAsyncFocusHdl+0x1211 vclmi.dll!Window::LinkStubImplAsyncFocusHdl+0x12e1 vclmi.dll!SalFrame::CallCallback+0x16 vclmi.dll!component_writeInfo+0x2c5f vclmi.dll!component_writeInfo+0x858c vclmi.dll!component_writeInfo+0x87ae USER32.dll!GetDC+0x6d USER32.dll!GetDC+0x14f USER32.dll!GetWindowLongW+0x127 USER32.dll!DispatchMessageW+0xf vclmi.dll!GraphiteLayout::textSrc+0x6180 vclmi.dll!GraphiteLayout::textSrc+0x6728 vclmi.dll!GraphiteLayout::textSrc+0x67c2 vclmi.dll!GraphiteLayout::textSrc+0x6867 vclmi.dll!Application::Abort+0x55 vclmi.dll!Application::Yield+0xd vclmi.dll!Application::Execute+0x1e vclmi.dll!DeInitVCL+0x7aa vclmi.dll!SVMain+0x1c sofficeapp.dll!soffice_main+0x81 soffice.bin+0x101b soffice.bin+0x103c kernel32.dll!RegisterWaitForInputIdle+0x49 comparable stacktraces are seen with other time consuming actions. It looks like that when hidden notes are involved a too complex call-back path is taken from USER32.DLL. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 111390] OOo Calc 3.0.1 and higher -- Notes bug
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111390 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Nov 8 14:44:25 + 2010 --- The above description is based on version Windows OOO330m13, build 9539. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 113631] Some Fields Not Displayin g Properly in Subforms
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113631 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Oct 4 07:59:58 + 2010 --- Issue 113724 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. I understood that this issue is available in build 330m7. I tested today with 330m8 and found that display of query result of query with joins of two tables are still failing in 'Base' mode and not in 'Native' mode. I added an attachment to issue 113724 (http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/71929/issue113724.odb) to show the issue. Two queries simpleBase and simpleNative. I played with various field types to join: int-int, bigint-bigint, varchar-varchar, but all showed same behavior. I'm sure whether this issue needs to be reopened or the other one, for not being a duplicate. The only workaround I've found so far is to make 'views' of all queries that need to run in Base mode (Queries use to feed SRB (ORB) or parametrized queries need this). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 113724] Base-SQL with join and mu ltiple records, returns copies of first record
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113724 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Oct 4 07:48:49 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=71929) Test database with two queries to show that join in base mode shows 'duplicate' values - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 113730] form controls grouped wit h non-form-control-objects are invisible
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113730 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Oct 4 06:47:26 + 2010 --- Is working in OOO330m9 (Build:9529) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 113631] Some Fields Not Displayin g Properly in Subforms
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113631 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Oct 4 17:07:25 + 2010 --- Maybe not the right place to continue discussion, but I checked issue 114026 and it states that it is related to use of table aliases. In the example that I've added to issue 113724, I do not use aliases in the queries, just only a inner join between two tables. So, might it be possible that this demo database (ref in two posts above) is tested against dba33j? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 113631] Some Fields Not Displayin g Properly in Subforms
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113631 User eremmel changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'r4zoli' |'eremmel,r4zoli' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114026] Run Query shows list tota lly filled with result of first row, when sele cting from tables with an alias name
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114026 User eremmel changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'eremmel' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 113730] From does not show groupe d objects (compatibility issue)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113730 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 9 08:49:33 + 2010 --- I notice that the grouping is shown OK when I open the document with 3.2.1 (OOO320m18, 9502). Played around and found a scenario with 300m86: 1. Create form via wizard on a table and take a Grid on table. 2. Draw a Rectangle (or other Drawing object, tested not all objects). 3. Make a grouping on both 4. Save and close form 5. Reopen form Now the drawing object is not shown. Other observations: A. When the grouping is on a grid of sub-form and a Drawing object, the grid is not shown as well until one hovers over the grid with mouse. B. Not showing control/objects also happens when group is made between other Form Control and Drawing object. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 113730] From does not show groupe d objects (compatibility issue)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113730 Issue #|113730 Summary|From does not show grouped objects (compatibility issu |e) Component|Database access Version|DEV300m84 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Sun Aug 8 13:57:35 + 2010 --- Dev 300m86 I've a from with a grouping of three objects. Opening/Editing the form does not show the objects on the form. Clicking in the area show the boundary markers. Ungrouping makes all visible. I tried to make a test cast from scratch but that seems to work. So it might be compatibility issue. I copied the form (without any database/tables) to a base from and there it showed the same behavior. Please find a document attached with two forms: one with grouping and the other with ungrouping. Form names point to test case. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 113730] From does not show groupe d objects (compatibility issue)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113730 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Sun Aug 8 14:00:16 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=71010) Base doc with two froms. One with grouping does not show group - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 113724] Base-SQL with join and mu ltiple records, returns copies of first record
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113724 Issue #|113724 Summary|Base-SQL with join and multiple records, returns copie |s of first record Component|Database access Version|DEV300m84 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P5 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Sat Aug 7 17:57:39 + 2010 --- Dev300m86 build 9518 I've a two table inner join and when running the query in BASE-SQL mode I get the right number of records, but the data is a copy of the first record returned. This does not happen when running the query in Native-SQL mode. This behavior is when I run the query from SQL and when I use the query in a form. I experienced this with DB Access, but copying the tables and query to HSQLDB showed the same issue. I attach a document with screen shots, because the database contains sensitive data. On request I'll put effort in making a reproduction database. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 113724] Base-SQL with join and mu ltiple records, returns copies of first record
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113724 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Sat Aug 7 17:59:36 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=71004) More details about the issue via screenshots - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 110536] SRB generates wrong 'orde r by' on report based on query with MS Access
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110536 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 27 10:54:10 + 2010 --- @oj: I might misunderstand you about the remark on order by (called 'Sort Options' in the wizard?). I notice that the selected grouping-columns are also shown as predefined columns in the SortOptions. The only thing is you can select the order (asc, desc). It makes however sense to add additional sort columns for the order of the rows put at the inner grouping level. Those sort-columns are not related to grouping at all. It might be handsome to move the selected order (asc/desc) of the grouping columns to the 'grouping' section in the wizard and leave the sort options for *aditional* sorting at the inner grouping level. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 112213] Report resets removed 'Da ta Series' in graphs.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112213 Issue #|112213 Summary|Report resets removed 'Data Series' in graphs. Component|Database access Version|OOO320m18 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|SRB Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 8 14:09:25 + 2010 --- When I open a report with e.g. a bar-graph and the query for the content of the bar graph contains more fields in the select clause then needed on graph, the all fields (Data Series) are shown again when I run the report after removing some, saving and closing SRB. I noticed this with testing with Base 3.2.1 and SRB 1.2.0. The Base document was made with OOo 3.1.1 and SRB 1.1.0 and runs fine in that version. I also tried the combination OOo 3.2.1 and SRB 1.1.0, but it shows the same behavior. So it looks like that OOo Base is responsible for the issue and not SRB itself. I created a test document issue-nr.odb and a more detailed reproduction description is found in the attached document issue-nr.odt. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 112213] Report resets removed 'Da ta Series' in graphs.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112213 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 8 14:12:29 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=69871) demo detabase: Report R1 shows to many Data Ranges in the graph - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 112213] Report resets removed 'Da ta Series' in graphs.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112213 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 8 14:13:18 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=69872) Reproduction information with screen shots - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 112213] Report resets removed 'Da ta Series' in graphs.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112213 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 8 14:22:24 + 2010 --- The issue persists also with version OOo Dev300_m76, SRB 1.2.1 Alpha - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 110536] SRB generates wrong 'orde r by' on report based on query with MS Access
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110536 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Sat Apr 10 08:08:34 + 2010 --- Have a look to this post as well http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13t=29440. This user is also experiencing problems with grouping in SRB, but is using a MySQL database and he got the error Every derived table must have its own alias. I do not have access to MySQL so can not prepare this further. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 110625] (invalid?) SQL Statement no longer work after JAVA Runtime Update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110625 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 5 21:28:57 + 2010 --- Have a look to this post 'Wrong data type java exception in jre1.6.0_18' at http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13t=28540 (including workaround/solution). Java has become more strict on date literals since 1.6.0_17 (or _18). It can also be reproduced with the internal HSQLDB, and imho depends on the JVM version only. I think that OOo should not fix this, but users should know the standards. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 110625] (invalid?) SQL Statement no longer work after JAVA Runtime Update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110625 User eremmel changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'mechtilde' |'eremmel,mechtilde' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 110535] Report fails with error ' SQL Status: S1000' on grouping wiht MSAccess
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110535 Issue #|110535 Summary|Report fails with error 'SQL Status: S1000' on groupin |g wiht MSAccess Component|Database access Version|OOO320m12 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|SRB Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 31 19:23:22 + 2010 --- When a report is made based on a query accessing MSAccess and this report is using grouping the following error is generated: Error: SQL Status: S1000 An error occurred while creating the report. Information: An exception of type com.sun.star.lang.WrappedTargetException was caught. Error: The specified field '`X`' could refer to more than one table listed in the FROM clause of your SQL statement. Error: The specified field '`X`' could refer to more than one table listed in the FROM clause of your SQL statement. This error occurs when there is more than one table in the from-clause of query involved and the field X from the select clause of that query is available in more than one table. Possible workarounds are: 1 Edit the report and change the property 'Analyze SQL command': No at the Data-tab of the root element of the report (Navigator). But than no parameters can be used. 2 Make from the query derived table and query that. (see Query2 in issueN.odb) It looks like that when 'Analyze SQL command' is active the Meta-data MSAccess interface is used, but the implementation or the interface itself has some short comings. Please find attached a reproduction document issueN.odb and a MSAccess database issueN.mdb with N is this case number. In the reproduction document one can find: Queries: Query1: query that joins two tables with same field names ID and Value. Query2: query that uses Query1 and workaround 2. Reports: q1.ReportNoGroup: report bases on query1 without grouping and with 'Analyze SQL command' is active, so runs fine. q1.ReportWithGroupingFails: report bases on query1 with grouping on ID and with 'Analyze SQL command' is active, this is failing. q1.ReportWithGroupingOK: report bases on query1 with grouping on ID and with 'Analyze SQL command' is NOT active, this is OK. q2.ReportWithGroupingOK: report bases on query2 with grouping on ID and with 'Analyze SQL command' is active, this is OK (workaround 2). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 110535] Report fails with error ' SQL Status: S1000' on grouping wiht MSAccess
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110535 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 31 19:24:33 + 2010 --- This is issue is also identified with Dev300m75 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 110535] Report fails with error ' SQL Status: S1000' on grouping wiht MSAccess
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110535 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 31 19:30:01 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=68680) Reproduction Base document - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 110535] Report fails with error ' SQL Status: S1000' on grouping wiht MSAccess
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110535 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 31 19:31:49 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=68681) MsAccess database corresponding with issue110535.odb - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 110536] SRB generates wrong 'orde r by' on report based on query with MS Access
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110536 Issue #|110536 Summary|SRB generates wrong 'order by' on report based on quer |y with MS Access Component|Database access Version|OOO320m12 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|SRB Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 31 19:52:32 + 2010 --- When I've created a Query2 for MSAccess like SELECT `ID`, `Value` FROM ( SELECT `T1`.`ID`, `T1`.`Value` FROM `T2`, `T1` WHERE `T2`.`ID` = `T1`.`ID` ) `X` and make a report with grouping on field ID the query text is copied to the report source and extended with an order by. But this fails: SELECT `ID`, `Value` FROM ( SELECT `T1`.`ID`, `T1`.`Value` FROM `T2`, `T1` WHERE `T2`.`ID` = `T1`.`ID` ) `X` ORDER BY `T1`.`ID` It looks like SRB is using the meta-data API but this is returning unexpected information. For a reproduction see issue 110535. It contains a Base document with the example Query2 and the corresponding MSAccess database. 1 Make a report with the wizard 2 Select Query 2 as source 3 Select grouping on ID 4 Finish report 5 When one tries to open the report an error is shown. 6 Open report and check the data source query text and note the wrong field specification on the ORDER BY. Note that one can also specify in (most?) databases an ORDER BY with field-sequence numbers according the sequence-number of that field in the SELECT clause. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 110536] SRB generates wrong 'orde r by' on report based on query with MS Access
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110536 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 31 20:27:53 + 2010 --- This issue is also identified on Dev300m75. It is remarkable that with internal HSQLDB the following ORDER BY is created in case of a derived table: ORDER BY SYSTEM_SUBQUERY.ID. So SRB is relying on the meta data API of the database, and this gives trouble with MSAccess. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 109617] Moving Cells by Drag-and -Drop not working when multiple sheets are se lected
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109617 Issue #|109617 Summary|Moving Cells by Drag-and-Drop not working when multi |ple sheets are selected Component|Spreadsheet Version|OOO320m12 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|spreadsheet Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 25 23:13:00 + 2010 --- The actions described in Moving Cells by Drag-and-Drop with key modifiers Ctrl, Alt do only work on visible sheet when more than one sheet is selected. The action applied on the non-visible sheets is as if the key modifiers were not used. This is annoying when one want to duplicate rows on multiple sheets at once. Test process: - Fill Sheet1 and Sheet2 with some data. - Select both Sheets, make Sheet1 visible - Select row 2 - Do a move of row 2 to row 4 (Alt key + right mouse) - Note that the move did not work on Sheet2 (row 2 is empty and row 4 is overwritten with data from row 2 (This also the case for DEV300m70) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 109617] Moving Cells by Drag-and -Drop not working when multiple sheets are se lected
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109617 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 26 00:11:35 + 2010 --- I wrote in test process - Do a move of row 2 to row 4 (Alt key + right mouse) Should be - Do a move of row 2 to row 4 (Alt key + left mouse) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 105232] Wrong sorting of document s when using diacritics and user defined sort lists
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105232 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 28 17:03:42 + 2010 --- I can reproduce this with 3.1.1. The issue is likely that when multiple column sort is enabled, the 'User-defined sort' is applied to all columns, but one should apply it only to the columns that contain the of that type. So the 'User-defined sort' should become a property of each sort column on the first tab, or Calc should be smart enough to figure out with column(s) is(are) according the 'User-defined sort' order. The next issue will become that an user wants to sort on Month and Weekday, so to 'User-defined sort' orders are involved - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 37988] Field Shading Doesn't Turn Off
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=37988 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 27 12:52:07 + 2010 --- Is it possible to add a 'color' that acts like transparent? Because changing the background color is not so handsome when one directs it as well with conditional formatting. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 108590] In SRB MAX() MIN() functi ons two days off
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108590 Issue #|108590 Summary|In SRB MAX() MIN() functions two days off Component|Database access Version|OOO310m19 Platform|Unknown URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|SRB Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Fri Jan 22 21:26:20 + 2010 --- When I create a report with SRB and want to have the MIN or MAX value of a date field I can create a function in two ways. One is by hand using the code like: name : MaxD initial : [D] function : MAX([D];[MaxD]) The result of this function is two days too less, the same applies to MIN() One can also create implicit a MAX function by adding a formated field and select the Date tab on the properties. One can select 'Date Field Type': 'Function' and 'Function' : 'Maximum'. This function is constructed like: name : MaxD initial : [D] function : IF([D][MaxD];[D];[MaxD]) This goes OK. When one wants to work with a simple 2-value max the latter is a fine alternative, but with more than 2 values it becomes complex. See the attached document for more details and run Report 'Q'. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 108590] In SRB MAX() MIN() functi ons two days off
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108590 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Fri Jan 22 21:30:28 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=67367) Base document with report Q to demonstrate MAX/MIN issue in SRB with date types. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 108590] In SRB MAX() MIN() functi ons on date type two days off
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108590 User eremmel changed the following: What|Old value |New value Summary|In SRB MAX() MIN() functio|In SRB MAX() MIN() functio |ns two days off |ns on date type two days o | |ff - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 104413] multiple columns with sam e name/alias show same result in BASE
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104413 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Sun Jan 10 16:34:35 + 2010 --- cdruler, your problem is not related to this issue, you do not have the same column name(s), because you made them all unique by use of aliases. You might have here an issue, but first step should be to visit forum of OOo. You might have a look here http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=61t=26226. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 106543] Default field values not shown in subform with Table Control
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106543 Issue #|106543 Summary|Default field values not shown in subform with Table C |ontrol Component|Database access Version|OOO310m19 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Nov 2 10:34:15 + 2009 --- Default field value(s) not shown in empty subform with Table Control when the previous record value was not initialized in the sub form of the previous main-record record. The following test description based on the sample database might make things more clear. The sub form has two fields with form-based default values (one text and one ListBox), both containing the phrase 'default'. When you open the form 'MainSubwithTableControl_Failing' and walk along the records of the main form look to the default values in the sub form of those main form records that have any record in the sub form. Some times the default values are displayed and sometimes not. Please follow the following sequence of steps through the main table step with the next-record indicator and note the comments. Main table | Sub form | Comment #Record 1| not empty | default values at insert position are not shown because record position is not at insert position. 2| empty | Default values are shown because records position indicator is at insert position. 3| not empty | see #1 4| empty | see #2 5| empty | Default values are not shown !!! 6| empty | see #5 7| not empty | See #1 8| empty | See #2 9 insert | N.A. | Do not enter any data. Sub form is empty because | main form is in insert mode 8| empty | See #5 The conclusion is that default values are not shown on an empty subform when the previous data set on the subform is also empty or missing due to insert mode at main form. This does not apply for a non table control based sub form: check with form 'MainSubwithSingleRecord_OK' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 106543] Default field values not shown in subform with Table Control
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106543 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Nov 2 10:37:37 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=65848) Base doc to prove not shown default values in table control as subform - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 106543] Default field values not shown in subform with Table Control
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106543 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Mon Nov 2 12:14:21 + 2009 --- Yes, issue is fixed in OOO320m3, 9436, but playing around on from 'MainSubwithTableControl_Failing' did show some side effects or is this other issue? I got impression that sub form content is not always following main-form: Open the form, press insert record on main form and try to press next/previous to abandon insert mode. Continue trying and thinks get locked up. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 104901] After changing default va lues in tables the Primarykey Autoincrement st arts at 0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104901 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 20:12:04 + 2009 --- The error does not only occur when changing the default value, but also when changing the format of a field, the type of a field, etc. An other workaround is to execute the statement: ALTER TABLE bookmark ALTER COLUMN ID INTEGER GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY (START WITH 100, INCREMENT BY 2) This workaround does not work with out ', INCREMENT BY n' or with ',INCREMENT BY 1' After the above statement and the one mentioned above the error does not occure any more. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 104413] multiple columns with sam e name/alias not handled will in BASE
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104413 Issue #|104413 Summary|multiple columns with same name/alias not handled will | in BASE Component|Database access Version|OOO310m11 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P4 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 15:59:19 + 2009 --- When I have a query in SQL Editor that has the different fields with same field name (coming from different tables/queries) the results displayed for those fields are all the same. This happens in when direct-SQL mode is OFF. This happens not when direct-SQL mode is ON. It looks like that when in non-direct-SQL mode BASE is binding on column name, but when executing in direct-SQL mode binding is done differently. A simple workaround exists: just give each column a unique name/alias. In the attached database I've two queries with the only difference non-direct-SQL mode (query: Same_Column_Names_Base_Wrong) and in direct-SQL mode (query: Same_Column_Names_Native_OK). Please examine the differences in results. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 104413] multiple columns with sam e name/alias not handled will in BASE
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104413 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 16:02:57 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=64308) database with queries to show issue 104413 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 104413] multiple columns with sam e name/alias show same result in BASE
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104413 User eremmel changed the following: What|Old value |New value Summary|multiple columns with same|multiple columns with same | name/alias not handled wi| name/alias show same resu |ll in BASE|lt in BASE --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 16:06:18 + 2009 --- Note that the right result in direct-SQL of query Same_Column_Names_Native_OK is only shown when one opens the editor and then execute the query. When the query is started by double-clicking on it, is shows also the wrong result. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 97811] Base with MS Access does n ot accept literals in concatenation with plus symbol
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97811 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Sun Mar 15 22:27:38 + 2009 --- I played with the internal database of Base and found the same issue as I reported for Base with MS Access. The internal database supports two concatenation operators '||' and '+'. Base is not able to parse queries that use the '+' operator for concatenation in combination with a literal value. I attached a test database 97811.ods that contains the following queries: q_concat_col_plus_col with Base SQL: ok This query proves that concatenation with '+' symbol is supported with internal database. q_concat_col_plus_literal with Direct SQL:ok This query proves that concatenation with '+' symbol is supported with internal database in direct SQL mode. Disable Direct SQL mode makes the query fail. q_concat_col_plus_literal via derived table with Base SQL: ok This proves the workaround by using a derived table. Note the other 'workaround' for internal Base database is to use the more common '||' operator, but that is no available for MS access. I assume that both databases suffer from the fact that Base SQL parser can not parse literal string values in combination with '+' symbol as string concatenation. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 97811] Base with MS Access does n ot accept literals in concatenation with plus symbol
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97811 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Sun Mar 15 22:29:13 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=60939) Test database containing queries for testing - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 96703] Form-subform relation fail s with direct SQL
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96703 --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Sun Mar 15 22:50:13 + 2009 --- A workaround is to implement the Direct-SQL query as an view and use the view in the sub-form. This is however limited to read-only form-subform relations. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 97811] Base with MS Access does n ot accept literals in concatenation with plus symbol
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97811 Issue #|97811 Summary|Base with MS Access does not accept literals in concat |enation with plus symbol Component|Database access Version|OOO300m9 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P4 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|eremmel --- Additional comments from erem...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 6 18:30:49 + 2009 --- Not native executed queries in Base against MS access database that contain a concatenations based on plus symbol, break when a string literal value is involved. The reported error is: SQL Status HY000, Error code:1000 Syntax error in SQL expression, syntax error, unexpected $end, expecting BETWEEN or IN or SQL_TOKEN_LIKE The following example goes wrong: SELECT f1 + 'value' FROM table1; whereas this is OK: SELECT f1 + f2 FROM table1; A workaround is: SELECT X.f1 + X.v FROM ( SELECT f1, 'value' AS v FROM table1 ) X - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
