[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 20 20:26:16 + 2010 --- One additional response to the comments about the Repair function being the solution... It is *insane* to have to a full repair *installation* when the only thing that I want to change/repair is the file associations. A repair *installation* takes *minutes*... a repair/reset/modification to file associations would take mere seconds. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 18 19:36:44 + 2010 --- hey guys, do you wanna some inspiration for new user friendly and productive icons? take a look here... http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding/Mimetype_Icons/Proposals I like dr.Faust's Eco-style the best... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 14:08:30 + 2010 --- @bluedrache Excuse me? I wasn't the one who suggested using thugs with guns to try to force the OOo developers to change their software. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 16:41:46 + 2010 --- @bluedrache Well, if your comment was directed at the person who initially suggested using the ADA Act to force this issue, you should indicate so (by specifying who you are addressing as we are doing now). The way it reads, it was directed at my comment. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 17:09:56 + 2010 --- @ed2 What exactly do you think happens when government enforces a law? Every law is enforced at gunpoint, and the ones bearing the guns are thugs, nothing more nothing less. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 20:41:22 + 2010 --- @ed2 You're not serious? What do you think happens if someone disobeys a law, then disobeys a court order to obey the law? Someone (or more) comes knocking on their door, and guess what? They'll be armed to the teeth. ALL laws are enforced at gunpoint. Just because you don't always see the gun is irrelevant. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 21:27:37 + 2010 --- @ed2 Enjoy living in your fantasy world. Or better yet - pick a law and refuse to obey it (of course it would have to be a law where someone in power will notice that you are disobeying it), and let me know how it goes when the enforcers pay you a visit and you continue to refuse to obey... I'm done, sorry to everyone else for the OT noise... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 23 14:52:08 + 2010 --- I am against any and all government intrusions into the private sector, regardless of how well-meaning such intrusions may be. The bottom line is, if I, as a software developer, choose not to cater to the handicapped, then that is my problem - the worst punishment that I should suffer is the loss of users that are handicapped. Give fascists an inch, they'll take the whole damned playing field. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Sat Jul 31 20:57:21 + 2010 --- @cornouws The icon pack is most certainly *not* a 'reasonable solution' to this bug. It is a hack and workaround that would be a major headache to employ in a corporate environment and I will *not* be going down that road. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Sat Jul 31 20:59:12 + 2010 --- Oh - and that said, thanks and kudos to tommy27 and anyone else who provided the icon packs and figured out a way for individual users to get their icons back. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 16 11:32:10 + 2010 --- @sweigel said: But sorry: by definition this is *not* a defect, because what we have got is exactly what was intended. http://de.openoffice.org/scdocs/ddIssues_EnterModify.html#issuetype Excuse me sweigel, but just because someone broke something intentionally does not mean it is not broken. THESE ICONS ARE BROKEN. PERIOD. AND THAT MAKES THIS A DEFECT. @mh said: no need to have a dispute about issue type and priorities. this topic is clearly on the current agenda and will be worked on the public mailing lists. Please point to JUST ONE example of how the seriousness of this issue is 'clearly on the current agenda and will be worked on the public mailing lists'? I have not seen even ONE serious statement from any OpenOffice.org developer in an official capacity, much less anything from Sun/Oracle -and no, comments in here from someone who may or may not be a developer or employee of Sun/Oracle don't count. @of said: Can we get rid of 'community members' who call other people brainless f*cker? I'm not willing to work together with such users. the truth sometimes is painful. While I would not use such language, I agree with its sentiment. Whoever made this decision should absolutely and unequivocally be FIRED. Remember: We are just talking about icons! Rotflmao! This actually sounds like something the one who made such a brain-dead decision would say... so was it you? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 16 11:40:56 + 2010 --- @cornouws ssid: Hi guys, Additional comments on how important this issue is, do not help. You said that things were changing for the better. I have been waiting patiently, but have seen no evidence to support your claim. Sorry, but BP has been doing a better job of handling the Gulf Oil debacle than Oracle/OOo developers have of handling this screw up with the icons. How about a FORMAL STATEMENT from someone at Oracle? Or at least from one of the lead OOo developers? I have said it before, but I'll now put my money where my mouth is: I'll wager $1,000 that this issue was 'confirmed by votes' faster than any issue in the history of OOo's development (40 MINUTES), and that it garnered 100 votes (less than 5 DAYS), then again 200 votes (a little over one MONTH), faster than any previous issue as well. If that doesn't warrant at least a formal statement from someone admitting the mistake and promising action, then nothing does. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 15 18:59:33 + 2010 --- In my opinion it should be a stopper for 3.2.2 release, but when I submitted this bug for approval to the releases list as a blocker, all I got was a lot of grief, and was even accused by someone of being a troll... Maybe if 10 or 50 other people joined the releases list and did the same thing it would get someone's attention... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 15 19:02:00 + 2010 --- By the way... Whoever is the Bug Opener for this bug - please change the Issue Type to DEFECT - since it is, regardless of whether or not the change was intentional. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 6 11:36:26 + 2010 --- @kongnan Like I said - it is *not* a physical impossibility, it is purely a *political* decision, and a piss poor one at that. The fact is, it would only take any half-competent graphics artist an hour to colorize the new icons. It is the political red tape that is preventing this from simply happening. What is needed is someone that can make a command decision without requiring a 'consensus' of some brain dead 'committee'. And yes - if you hadn't noticed, I loathe politics, and political correctness, both of which, I'm sorry to say, OOo is massively infected with. @tommy27 If you read this thread, and my comments, you sill clearly see that most people do indeed like the new icons *except* for the lack of color. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 5 19:09:37 + 2010 --- @cornouws No offense, and this isn't aimed at you, it is aimed at the politicians masquerading as software developers: I don't care how long it took them to redesign these icons, the fact is, they BLEW IT by going with bw, and whoever's decision this was/is simply is not man (or woman) enough to admit they made a mistake and fix it. PERIOD. END OF SENTENCE. What infuriates me the most about things like this is how totally unnecessary it is. The solution is easy: 1. GO BACK TO THE OLD ICONS WITH THE NEXT POINT RELEASE, and 2. Start the process over again for redesigning the icons, taking into account the fact that bw icons are NOT ACCEPTABLE. There is absolutely NO reason that the above cannot be done for the 3.2.2 release (much less the 3.3 release), save one: THE DECISION MAKER(S) DON'T CARE. Well, guess what? As of now, I don't care either. I am now in the process of working on migrating our entire office over to KOffice. Since we're on windows, and KOffice isn't entirely stable on windows yet, it may not be able to happen in the next few months, or even the next year, but it will happen - unless by some miracle things change drastically with the OOo development process prior to KOffice being ready for prime time on windows. So long, OOo devs, and thanks for all the fish! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Sat Jun 12 14:56:05 + 2010 --- It is far more important to get the colors back than the get the ODF stamp on them. I don't mind the ODF being there *for ODF files*, but it si far less important than simply getting the colors back. Even though I like the older icons less than the design of the new ones, I'd much rather 3.2.2 simply revert to the old icons, than continue debating on the newer ones. The debate on the newer ones can then continue until a reasonable consensus is reached *that includes a lot of input form users and voters in this bug*. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Jun 11 11:56:18 + 2010 --- @cornouws Well, since there has actually been a major change in that Oracle bought Sun, I'll take your word for it and stop complaining and adopt a wait and see... I can only hope the change is for the better... :) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 10 20:57:55 + 2010 --- @cornouws It is honestly hard to trust it will be fixed, considering the total lack of response here in the Issue Comments from any OOo developers, in spite of the fact that this issue has accumulated 105 votes in just 5 days, and was 'confirmed by votes' in 40 *minutes* (both of which must be records). Do a query on all open issues with more than 100 votes. Then go read all of the comments for some of them. The fact is, the OOo development process doesn't really care what those of us in the OOo user community want or think. I'm not saying all of the *developers* are like that, but the *process* *creates* *the* *condition* - and now we have these shiny new politically correct 'icons' we are now stuck with for ... how long? Only time will tell. Not to mention the fact that the issue with the most votes currently (468) is 8.5 years old, still marked as 'NEW', and to add insult to injury, is *already* *fixed* (in the go-oo code base). Shall I bring up the fact that there is still no true OOo community as was promised by Sun from day one, just a Sun (now Oracle?) dictatorship? Trust is something that must be earned, and the OOo developercommunity process has not earned much of anyone's trust, and for good reason. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 10 19:24:38 + 2010 --- I like them prowler, and would vote to hire you to do the rest, post links to all of the OOo lists asking for feedback about these vs the 'new' blackj and white ones - and just apply the changes immediately once the majority of people gave a thumbs up (as they would, I am 100% sure)... Then I'd do what other open source projects have done - have an open *contest* where *anyone* can submit designs for new icons, post links everywhere, and let the OOo user base vote on them. I think the main point though is, these icons should *never* have been changed like this without a *lot* of inquiries on the user lists and elsewhere, consulting with usability experts - who would have, of course, nixed the idea of colorless icons in a microsecond. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 10 20:16:55 + 2010 --- I like this one too... but honestly, I'd like anything better than the bw icons... At least you guys are showing it really isn't that hard of a thing to do. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112256] icon for doc files have o df logo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112256 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 9 20:35:33 + 2010 --- I have seen the same problem, but since I have been forbidden from installing 3.2.1 on any of our (60+) computers by the owner of the company until the lack of colr for the icons is fixed, and I already downgraded my own, I cannot confirm with any precision at the moment, but, if memory serves, this particular problem, with the 'ODF' showing on MS .doc, .xls and .ppt files, was only for Domain users that did not have Local Admin rights - our users have Power User Rights, not Admin. Power Users is only one small step down from full Admin Rights though, so shouldn't matter... I'll confirm this on a test PC in the morning and report back exactly how to replicate the problem. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 112141] Reintroduce color codes f or mime type icons
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 7 17:44:16 + 2010 --- 2 things: 1. I really like the new *patterns* on the new icons. 2. The monochromatic aspect has *got* to go. 3. What is up with the 'ODF' label on NON-ODF MICROSOFT file formats (.doc, .xls, .ppt, etc)? That is not just ugly, it is plain *wrong*. I hope the devs are reading this bug report, as I have been forbidden by my boss (when I showed this to him this morning) from installing this update on any of our 60+ windows workstations until this is fixed, which sucks because that means we don't get any new bug fixes or functionality enhancements until then, and as slow as OOo has been to make changes, this might be a while. Please, guys, you changed these in a minor revision bump, you can bring back the different colors in 3.2.2, can't you? Like I said in #1 above, I really do like the new icons *except* for the lack of color. Oh, and what is up with making a major change like this in a minor update revision? I thought that was a big no-no in software development? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 7180] Need ability to move column s/rows in spreadsheet
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7180 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 26 19:38:10 + 2010 --- How is this 'fixed'? I don't see 'Insert cut/copied cells' in any context menu anywhere? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 28 14:17:13 + 2009 --- I see the status of this was just changed to Whiteboard... If this means there is actually work going on toward producing something along the lines of a FAM, then: 1. thanks! and 2. is it possible that, since I opened the request and this functionality is a huge personal concern, that I could participate? Oh - one other comment - most Windows machines already have .doc files associated with wordpad or notepad... so instead of OOo taking over this association, it leaves them associated with wordpad... brilliant... If I hadn't discovered the command-line switches available at install time, my boss would have switched our entire 80 user base to MSO... as it is, he still really wants to be able to manage these through the GUI - as do I... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 8302] Allow to insert/delete into /from the middle of merged cells.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 2 14:35:31 + 2009 --- So does this mean that this feature will definitely be available in 3.2? Thanks for getting this done! It is/was uncomfortably close to a showstopper for us... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 70851] Input Fields prompted for TWICE (double prompted)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 13 15:01:25 + 2009 --- Ok, this problem just bit me again after a major editing session on some of our templates, but this time I am being QUADRUPLE prompted for the fields! :( This bug shows as being 'STARTED', but with a milestone of 'later'. This problem has got to be bogger than just me... Is there any interest in these templates, or is the problem known, but the fix a lot of work? Please, someone (dev), comment and let me know whats up. Thanks... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 70851] Input Fields prompted for TWICE (double prompted)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851 User tanstaafl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Priority|P3|P2 --- Additional comments from tansta...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 13 15:31:53 + 2009 --- I really, really need to be able to have multiple/optional page styles that can be applied, depending on the status of the document... For example, I want to have a page style for 'REVISED', and one for 'CANCELLED', that apply different watermark backgrounds when applied. But currently there is no way to do this if you have any fields in either the header or footer, unless you're willing to suffer with massive multiple prompts for the same fields. Please, please, someone tell me this problem is fixable, or that someone cares. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 User tanstaafl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Version|OOo 2.2 |OOo 3.0 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 20 14:55:51 + 2008 --- The silence is deafening... Again... HOW DO I MANAGE THESE FILE ASSOCIATIONS NOW? Example: When someone installs the Compatability Pack for Office 2007, it takes over all file associations, even for normal .doc, etc files)... With 2.x, this was no problem... simply do a repair install and let OOo take back the file associations. Now, I can't even do this. This absolutely and purely SUCKS. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 8302] want to be able to insert i nto the middle of merged cells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 21 11:20:33 + 2008 --- I absolutely agree that data loss should never happen, and at worst, if a condition exists that would result in data loss is encountered, an appropriate error should be provided. I also agree that, if possible, the calc implementation should be better, if there are limitations in the way Excel does it that can be addressed... But, regardless of making it 'better', we need basic functionality *now*. I am already fighting what appears to be a losing battle with the management here to roll out MSO for everyone. The only real reason they haven't done so yet is the cost... but the louder the users yell about 'Office can do all these things that OOo can't!', the less of a reason the cost becomes. This issue is one of the biggest complaints we have right now about Calc... And now I have to contend with the TOTAL loss of any way to manage file associations (admittedly this is an admin (meaning, MINE) problem rather than an end user problem, but it is a serious one... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 8 12:07:17 + 2008 --- Now OOo will automatically take over the MSO file extensions in case no application at all is registered for them and it will automatically not take them over in case there is an application registered. I think that makes a lot of sense. I agree - to a point. And if you will read this Feature Request, you will see that this is exactly how I had envisioned this working - with the addition that, since OOo is CAPABLE of doing this evaluation, AND because it is capable of making the necessary registry changes, then it only makes sense that this functionality should be made available in such a way as to be EASILY MANAGED. Meaning, RECORD the CURRENT registry settings PRIOR to making the changes, and provide a simple mechanism for MANAGING these registry settings. Removing configuration options where the application is able to handle that itself reasonably is basically a good idea. I agree... Especially if data is available that proofs that the configuration setting is misunderstood by many users. Again I agree... I also understand that expert users might want to configure this by themselves differently. This is a valid request, though IMHO not one with a high priority. I disagree - VEHEMENTLY. While I would agree if the functionality were not ALREADY THERE, removing EXISTING functionality - in essence, DUMBING DOWN an application - just because the WAY it is currently implemented is confusing to SOME users, is totally RIDICULOUS. Perhaps someone can provide this as an extension? That would be perfectly acceptable, but the main problem that I have with this is THE FUNCTIONALITY ALREADY EXISTS. Why should someone else have to reinvent the wheel? Just to be clear... I don't have a problem with the fact that the ability to choose the file associations at install time was removed. I have a problem with the fact that NO MECHANISM WAS PROVIDED TO TAKE THE PLACE OF THIS LOSS OF FUNCTIONALITY. At a minimum, the devs THEMSELVES - specifically, the one(s) that arbitrarily and unilaterally decided to remove this CRITICAL functionality should do it NOW. IMMEDIATELY. Am I pissed? VERY. Why? BECAUSE WHOEVER DID THIS JUST CAUSED OUR BOSS TO DECIDE TO SWITCH TO MSO IF THIS IS NOT FIXED PRIOR TO OUR UPGRADING TO VERSION 3.0. So, if this isn't fixed, OOo just lost an 80+ installed base, just because some dev somewhere decided they knew better than the people actually USING OOo. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 7 19:59:40 + 2008 --- Ok, I just installed 3.0rc4, and now even the ability to associate Microsoft Office files during Setup is gone? This was the main reason given in the responses to this bug I opened being not necessary. How are we supposed to handle these file associations now?? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 8302] want to be able to insert i nto the middle of merged cells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 9 18:46:24 + 2008 --- Personally, I see no reason to reinvent the wheel. How does the evil alternative do it? Do it that way, at least at first. If there is room for improvement, improve it, but lets just get it done. This one issue has been driving a movement to replace Openoffice on all 55+ of our PCs with MSO, and I'd really like to NOT see that happen. I've been putting people off with 'its coming in an upcoming release' for a while now, because there was a patch and it appeared to have been accepted into the codebase, but I'm very disturbed to find out thats not the case. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 31 19:48:34 + 2008 --- Maybe another option would be a separate utility? Please? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 8302] want to be able to insert i nto the middle of merged cells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 28 14:40:44 + 2008 --- @tanstaafl: you should get acquainted with the release schedule (see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease30 ) Ok... before accusing, let alone insulting, anyone. I didn't 'accuse' or 'insult' anyone my friend - and I don't think I was even rude - I simply pointed out a somewhat painful fact. Code freeze for OOo3.0 already passed some time ago Well, not *that* long ago... 4 months (April 2008), according to the link you provided. So... code freeze happened in April 2008, and the patch for this functionality was originally uploaded in May of *2007* - 9 *months* (almost a full *year*) before the code freeze, and 8 *months* before the feature freeze. Not only that, according to this thread, it was integrated in ooo-build in October of 2007, a full 6 *months* before the code freeze. So, how much time, exactly, do the devs need before merging a patch into the official build that has as many votes as this one has, *and* has a *working patch* that someone was willing to write to implement it? and only show stoppers are being fixed now. Yes, this patch should had been reviewed and maybe integrated earlier, but now it is too late for OOo3.0 Too late because the OOo devs are extremely unresponsive to user requests for features they (the devs) don't deem 'important', *even when a patch is provided*. This (the official OOo devs being slow and often unresponsive to accept patches from 'outside' devs) is a well known fact, and the primary reason that Novell started the go-ooo offering. Don't shoot the messenger... maybe your time would be better spent *listening*. I'm a *long* time OOo user - 7+ years in fact (we used Staroffice 5.2 before changing to a pre 1.0 version of Openoffice.org) - and Admin who rolls it out on all 60+ machines in our office - and I *do* appreciate very much the effort involved with developing and providing OOo - but there is also a very large level of frustration with OOo development (see above). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 8302] want to be able to insert i nto the middle of merged cells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 26 12:33:57 + 2008 --- 3.1?! What about 3.0?? The patch already exists, so if this isn't in 3.0, then I'm quickly losing faith in the sanity of the OOo devs, and will start looking at other builds like GoOOg... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 8302] want to be able to insert i nto the middle of merged cells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 2 13:05:57 + 2008 --- Since the target milestone is 3.x, why would you bother reporting that it doesn't work in 2.4? Patience is a virtue... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70851] Input Fields prompted for TWICE (double prompted)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 12:34:33 + 2008 --- Has there been any progress on fixing this issue? I'm just curious, because it still causes me no end of problems on some of my templates... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70851] Input Fields prompted for TWICE (double prompted)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 12:34:25 + 2008 --- Has there been any progress on fising this issue? I'm just curious, because it still causes me no end of problems on some of my templates... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 8302] want to be able to insert i nto the middle of merged cells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 12:24:59 + 2008 --- Wow, this is great that this will finally be possible. This is one of the most frustrating issues for some of our power users... Thanks guys!!! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 23 19:42:54 + 2007 --- You must have missed my prior comment... THE REPAIR OFTEN FAILS. PERIOD. Also, the KLUDGE of 'fixing' them by 'right-click', 'Open-with', check box 'Always use this program...' simply does not work for all situations. One MAJOR issue is with TEMPLATES. If I do this for a template, it then OPENS templates just as if it were a normal document, instead of creating a new blank document BASED on the template. Also, with this as part of the GUI, it would be very easy to not only repair file associations, but to RESET THEM TO WHAT THEY WERE BEFORE OOo WAS INSTALLED. Of course - all I can do is beg someone who is in a position to do something about this to see the value... it is just very frustrating to know that this problem - which is a very major hassle when it rears its ugly head - could be so easily fixed, if the ones who know how to fix it would simply create a simple UI to let us lowly users do it with a mouseclick or two... I am totally baffled at why anyone would be against this - it would only - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 11:34:33 + 2007 --- Hello, and thanks for taking the time to consider my comments... The 'File Association Repair' only *attempts* to reset them - it does not check/repair permissions if the perms on the registry settings that store them get muffed, nor does it report a failure to properly set them if it fails - and this has happened to me at least 4 or 5 times in the years that I have been using OOo. I'm *not* saying that it was OOo that muffed them - but I *am* saying that if they can be repaired manually (by changing perms), then they can be repaired automatically (as long as the repair attempt is run by a user with admin rights). There is no reason that a properly coded FAM couldn't test if current user has admin rights, and if so, it is 'enabled' in the GUI - if not, it is greyed out, with a message saying that this functionality requires being logged in as a user with admin rights. If the User has admin rights, then the FAM could easily test if required registry settings exist - if not, create them - then test if the perms on them are correct - if not, reset them - then, change the File Associations to whatever the user is requesting. Of course, if the filesystem itself is corrupted, then there is nothing that OOo can or should do about that, except maybe provide an error message to this effect. Lastly, I have had a *lot* of cases where I would like to be able to easily switch back and forth the Microsoft Office associations between MSO (or whatever they were set to before the OOo install) and OOo (including proper Template behavior) - but OOo doesn't record their previous state, so there is no way to do this. Providing this ability directly in the GUI preferences will only instill a new level of confidence with people who want to test OOo out side by side with MSO. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 19:27:14 + 2007 --- Repair did not work... There is absolutely no reason why OOo should not be able to manage these associations after it is installed. My problem apparently was caused by permissions problems on the registry settings. My argument is, if these can be fixed manually, by changing the permissions, there is no reason that an OOo FAM could not *also* handle permissions problems - again - as long as the User had Full Admin Rights... When you install OOo on Windows you are usually doing this for all users. Then the setup application registers the file associations for all users. Yes - all of which is exactly how the FAM would/should work... The file association manager in OOo will not be able to access these settings! Eh? Why not? Oh - re-reading my original post, I didn't make it clear that this functionality would only be available if the user trying to make use of it was logged on with Admin Rights... this is obvious, so I didn't specifically mention it... Instead of this it will try to set something for the current user. This will rather screw up things than fix them. Not if they are logged on with Admin Rights - and again, there is no reason that OOo couldn't simply detect this, and display a message (that this functionality requires being logged n as a User with Full Admin Rights) if a User who does not have full Admin Rights tries to access the FAM... A file association manager inside OOo does not make sense at all and especially on Vista is a No-No. It makes *perfect* sense, due to its nature (a full Office Suite that has the ability to take over File Associations of another Office Suite) - even in Vista... As I said - I do understand that this ability must be limited to a User who is logged in with Administrative Rights, and that changes affect all users (just as they do at install time). Again, not *one* argument I have ever heard against having a File Associations Manager built into OOo makes any sense to me... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 21:34:28 + 2007 --- Why not? That is a silly statement, anyway - the Multi-User Installer *itself* *requires* Admin Rights... so why is *that* ok, but not to have a related function that also requires it? Besides - if OOo can be installed as an ordinary user, then it can manipulate file associations as that ordinary user in the same way. It does so *now*, doesn't it? This isn't rocket science... it is very simple... OOo allows for installation on a Windows machine in two different modes: Multi-user (requires Admin Rights) or for Single User. If OOo can correctly set the file associations at install time, for each of these two modes, it should be able to MANAGE these changes as well. It should be smart enough to know *how* it was installed (as an Admin, for 'All Users', or as a normal user, only for that user). The FAM should then behave in accordance with how it was installed - meaning: 1. If it was installed by an Admin in Multi-user mode, then it should require Admin rights to manipulate File Associations - just like it requires Admin Rights to install/uninstall it. 2. If it was installed in Single-User mode, then the FAM should behave accordingly (however OOo handles single user installation File Association modifications currently). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 Issue #|77257 Summary|File Association Manager for Windows version Component|Installation Version|OOo 2.2 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows, all Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|ENHANCEMENT Priority|P2 Subcomponent|ui Assigned to|of Reported by|tanstaafl --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 11 18:43:20 + 2007 --- Hello, I know that there have been a few discussions about this, and that some people have strong feelings that this is something that OOo should not do, but I want to make my *strong* argument in favor it, so I would appreciate it if you would take the time to read this in its entirety. I am taking the time to create this Issue/Enhancement Request after being bitten by this problem *again*. It has happened to me at least 5 or 6 times in the years I've been using OOo, and, although it doesn't happen very often, when it does, the ony way I have found to fix it is to reinstall Windows, and, in my opinion, this is just not acceptable. Recently I again had a problem where OOo lost its file associations - for its *own* file types, not MSO file types - and nothing I did was able to repair them. A reinstall/repair of windows, does, however, every time. First - the usual recommended method of 'right-click, open with...' is totally unusable for me anyway, because it will not work for the Template file associations - when templates are re-associated this way, from that point on, OOo will not treat them as it should treat templates (copy contents of template into new blank document, initiate prompt for input fields), it just opens them, as if I had right-clickopened them. All this functionality would have to do is: 1. Reset the file associations for all OOo file types (including templates) so that they work properly with OOo, (since OOo currently is capable of properly associating its own files upon installation, it should be trivial to add a button somewhere in the Preferences (maybe on the 'General' prefs, or could even be on its own - I am attaching a screenshot of how it could look on the 'General' prefs) that would simply re-associate all of the OOo file types with OOo) 2. If the user elects *not* to allow OOo take over the file associations for MSO files at install time, provide a button that takes them over - and records their current settings as per #3 below - just as if the user had elected to let OOo take them over at install time, if the user later decides they like OOo enough to do so, 3. If the user elects *to allow* OOo to take over the file associations for MSO files at install time (or does so per #2), record the current file associations, so that the user can easily reverse the settings if desired, 4. Provide a simple interface (see attached screenshot for an example of how simple this interface could be) that allows the user to do #1 anytime it may become necessary, and a way to switch MSO file associations back and forth (between being associated with OOo, and what they were before/when OOo was installed). It would also be very nice if these file associations could be set on a per-user basis, but I don't know if that is even possible in Windows. Thanks for listening... Charles - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 77257] File Association Manager f or Windows version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77257 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 11 18:44:32 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=45056) Screenshot example of simple File Association Management interface - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 8302] want to be able to insert i nto the middle of merged cells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 13:04:27 + 2007 --- Are there any plans on implementing this? I cannot believe this issue has been around this long. This one thing KILLED a migration I had begun for one of my clients - as soon as the owner of the company ran into this, he threw up his hands, and killed the project - at least for now. Please, please, please - this is such a pain in the butt, and should be so easy to fix... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70626] Table formatting in an imp orted MS Word document: cell border spacing ca nnot be freely adjusted.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70626 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 06:17:38 -0700 2006 --- You should always upload them here so they are part of the issue - what if some other dev wanted to work on it? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70851] Input Fields prompted for TWICE (double prompted)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
Issue #|70851
Summary|Input Fields prompted for TWICE (double prompted)
Component|Word processor
Version|OOo 2.0.4
Platform|All
URL|
OS/Version|Windows XP
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
Resolution|
Issue type|DEFECT
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|editing
Assigned to|mru
Reported by|tanstaafl
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 06:56:54 -0700
2006 ---
This is a strange one...
The issue is, once the bug is triggered, whenever you initiate the prompt for
Input Fields (either using 'ctrl-shift-F9' or when dbl-clicking on a template),
it prompts for all of the fields, then does it AGAIN - so, prompts for all of
the fields TWICE. Interestingly, deleting ALL of the Input Fields from both the
Header and Footer results in all of the Fields still being prompted for (even
though there are none there), but this time only once.
What I did to reproduce it was:
1. Modify the 'Default' Page Style of the newly created document to contain
Headers and Footers, then place Input Fields into them. Save it.
2. Create a new Page Style based on the 'Default' (which should be the current
selection) by using the 'New Style from Selection' option in 'Styles and
Formatting' 'Page Styles'.
3. Apply the newly created Style by dbl-clicking it.
4. Initiate the prompt for Input Fields ('ctrl-shift-F9').
5. You should be dbl-prompted for the fields.
NOTE: this bug does NOT trigger (at least it didn't for me) if you create the
Page Styles you want to use and apply them BEFORE you add the Input Fields to
the Header/Footer.
In other words, it should be reproducible by simply copying the 'Default' page
style to a custom one, then changing the current Page Style to the newly created
custom one.
I will attach three sample documents (templates are affected the same way), one
that doesn't exhibit the bug (before I changed the Page Styles), one that DOES
exhibit the bug (AFTER I changed the Page Styles), and one that I deleted ALL of
the Input Fields from AFTER the bug was triggered, which still prompts for all
of the Input Fields, but this time only once.
I have not been able to 'fix' a document once the bug is triggered. In fact,
deleting EVERYTHING in a broken document results in ALL of the Input Fields that
WERE there being prompted for ONCE.
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70851] Input Fields prompted for TWICE (double prompted)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851 User tanstaafl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |40054) No Double Prompt --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 06:58:05 -0700 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=40054) No Double Prompt - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70851] Input Fields prompted for TWICE (double prompted)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851 User tanstaafl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |40055) Input Fields Double | | Prompted --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 06:58:56 -0700 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=40055) Input Fields Double Prompted - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70851] Input Fields prompted for TWICE (double prompted)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70851 User tanstaafl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |40056) No Fields present - | | still prompted once for t | |hem --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 07:00:05 -0700 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=40056) No Fields present - still prompted once for them - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 67293] subsequent input fields do n't save keyboard input
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67293 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 09:19:48 -0700 2006 --- Wow! Now, what is the easiest way for me to test this? Will the next developer build contain the fix? Many thanks for fixing it! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 67293] subsequent input fields do n't save keyboard input
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67293 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 14:08:54 -0700 2006 --- I hadn't noticed this issue... although I agree it would be nice if the cursor stayed where it was when you saved the template. Is there already an issue created for this? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 67293] subsequent input fields do n't save keyboard input
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67293 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 08:25:14 -0700 2006 --- WHAT?!?!?!?!?! Please, PLEASE don't put off fixing this GLARING defect until 2.2 milestone. The simple fact is, we are now stuck on 2.0.2 until this is fixed, and if this is put off until 2.2, I think our boss will be inclined to just bite the bullet and buy Microsoft Office for all 50 of our computers. There is absolutely ZERO reason that this cannot be fixed for 2.1. It USED to work, and was BROKEN. Anyone who uses input fields on forms will be in the same boat as we are. This is bad, bad, BAD. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 67293] subsequent input fields do n't save keyboard input
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67293 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 10:54:10 -0700 2006 --- My apologies for 'crying' here... but if you only knew how hard this hit us... Being relegated to using 2.0.2 for the next 6+ months because of this one small bug that most likely is easily fixed is not something I want to have to try to sell my boss on. It was hard enough to get him to be ok waiting for 2.1 (2 months?), once I was able to get this bug 'accepted', verified, and targeted. The fact is, there are a lot of people here in the office that look for any excuse to push for a switch to Microsoft Office - I'm sure you are familiar with the type... It is because OOo has worked 'good enough' that the boss has been ok with staying with it (we've been using it since about 1.0.3). This is the first real painful bug that we have experienced - but for some people, that is all it takes. Anyway, my main concern is to keep the boss happy - but when he comes to me and asks why he is still on 2.0.2, after reading about the speed improvements with 2.1+, and I have to tell him its because if I upgrade him, his Forms won't work right - well, that's just a conversation I'd rather avoid, if you get my meaning... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 67293] subsequent input fields do n't save keyboard input
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67293 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 10:55:00 -0700 2006 --- And by the way - thanks for pushing for this and retargeting to 2.1 - I hope it is easy enough to fix to make it in... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70534] document statistics (word count) wrong in imported MS Word 2000 document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70534 User tanstaafl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |39851) Same document 'Save | |d As' .odt --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 18 06:11:02 -0700 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=39851) Same document 'Saved As' .odt - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70534] document statistics (word count) wrong in imported MS Word 2000 document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70534 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 18 06:06:37 -0700 2006 --- Actually, with a document created by Word 2003, I can't get the statistics to show up properly even after editing it in OOo (2.0.4, Windows XP Pro sp2 w/updates)... The word/character counts always show zero, and the paragraph count always shows 1. If I save the document as .odt, the statitstics then show properly. To reproduce: 1. Create a document with some test words/paragraphs in Word 2003 - save it. 2. Open with OOo 2.0.4... check statistics. 3. Update, close stats dialog, make changes, re-open stats dialog - no change, stats all wrong as explained above. 4. 'File' 'Save As' .odt... 5. Open stats, click update - stats all correct. I don't have Word 2000, so cannot confirm your particular behavior... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70534] document statistics (word count) wrong in imported MS Word 2000 document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70534 User tanstaafl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |39850) Word 2003 test doc | |ument --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 18 06:08:54 -0700 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=39850) Word 2003 test document - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70521] Word document not recognis ed as word document, opened as text
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70521 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 18 06:48:16 -0700 2006 --- According to the Document Properties in Word 2003, both of these files were originally Microsoft Word 5.0/5.1 for Macintosh Document, which are, I believe, not supported file types. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 66990] Prompt position works bad in input fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 2 03:08:58 -0700 2006 --- Ack! 2.1 ?! I really cannot imagine that this is that big of a deal to fix, since it is a regression, but maybe I'm mistaken... This is very, very sad for our entire company. It means we are stuck at 2.0.2 until OOo 2.1 is released, which will be... when? I cannot find the roadmap anywhere... I imagine anyone else that uses Input Fields on forms is in the same boat now. And in case the developers are listening - just because there aren't a lot of votes for this issue does NOT mean that it isn't affecting them. Most people cannot even figure out how to log into the bug reporter, much less figure out how to search for this one and actually find it. I imagine this is affecting a LOT of people. :( :( :( - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 66990] Prompt position works bad in input fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 2 04:41:06 -0700 2006 --- Not as sad as I was when I didn't know when 2.1 was due for release. I guess I understand that only so many bugs can be fixed in a limited amount of time... but it is definitely frustrating when one of the open bugs is one that affects you personally... ;) I do wish OOo was structured such that interim patches for things like this could be released, so that I could still install the newer versions and then apply the patch. Oh well, I am very happy that this is at least confirmed now, and targeted for fix at 2.1 release. Many thanks to the devs! Charles - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 66990] Prompt position works bad in input fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 2 13:35:43 -0700 2006 --- To fs: It is not just a focus issue... The cursor is about half-way down the input box, and you cannot move it up to the top. If it was just a focus issue, you'd be able to simply hit the backspace key to move the cursor to the top of the field. Are you saying that if you enter data with the cursor like this, it is saved? If so, that is definitely different behavior than I am experiencing. What version of Windows are you using? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 66990] Prompt position works bad in input fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 30 09:18:49 -0700 2006 --- Bummer... oh well, thanks anyway for the support - maybe you could add a vote or two for it as well? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 66990] Prompt position works bad in input fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990 User tanstaafl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |39474) Example problem Tem | |plate with 4 Input Fields --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 30 10:44:24 -0700 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=39474) Example problem Template with 4 Input Fields - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 66990] Prompt position works bad in input fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 30 10:46:40 -0700 2006 --- Sorry, guess I should have done that immediately, but it is so easy to duplicate (just create a Template with more than one Input Field on it), I didn't even think about it. Anyway, the Template I just uploaded is a generified version of our Faxcover. This one only has 4 Input Fields on it, but we have some Templates with 20 or more, and this problem gets exponentially worse the more fields you use. Many, many thanks for taking the time to confirm this and hopefully getting a fix in. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 66990] Prompt position works bad in input fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 30 13:55:35 -0700 2006 --- Interesting - so apparently it is a Windows only bug. I have confirmed this behavior on about 20 of the computers in our office (every one that I had already upgraded to 2.0.3). They are all running Xp Pro sp2, with most if not all security patches applied. Also, I have tested with the Sun JVM 1.5_Update_06, Update_07, and Update_08... Thanks again! If there is anything I can do to assist you, please don't hesitate to ask. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 66990] Prompt position works bad in input fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 10:43:38 -0700 2006 --- I'm very disappointed... this bug isn't even marked as confirmed, much less fixed in RC2... I'm no longer holding out much hope that it will get fixed for 2.0.4 (since it's not even marked as confirmed), which means I will have no choice but to revert everyone to 2.0.2 until it DOES get fixed. Very disappointing indeed. This is the first serious bug that I have ever encountered with OOo, that is apparently being completely ignored by the developers. A serious userland issue like this - especially one that is most likely a very simple fix - shouldn't require lots of votes just to get the attention of a developer. The fact is, this bug makes OOo look VERY BAD to people who try to use simple Input fields on their forms. Charles Marcus I.T. Director Media Brokers International - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 66990] Prompt position works bad in input fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 13:25:18 -0700 2006 --- Many, many thanks!! I'm very glad to hear that someone is going to be looking at this... But when you say 'in the next 2.0.4', do you mean the fix probably won't make it into 2.0.4 final? I hope that isn't what you meant, but if so, as long as it will get fixed by 2.0.5, I guess I'll survive... Thanks again! Charles - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 69612] 2.0.4 RC2/Sun provided bui ld calls home without asking
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69612 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 21 03:34:12 -0700 2006 --- I'm confused... I saw a mention that this existed somewhere in 2.0.3, but I don't see it anywhere, nor in the help. Is this an actual online update feature? Or is this *solely* a *notification* feature. If the former, then this will be very welcome, once the bugs have been worked out, and I'll be happy to test it in our office and provide feedback. However, if this is *only* a *notification* feature, then I really don't see what all the fuss is about. Just a simple notification about the auto-update feature before the install, along with a way to turn it off, should suffice, but I surely don't see why this should hold up the release of 2.0.4. I'm much more concerned that simple UI bugs, like [url=http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69612]this one[/url], get fixed (still not even marked as confirmed, much less fixed in 2.0.4rc2). This has been plaguing our office since we updated to 2.0.3, and I have heard many loud complaints about how that other office application doesn't have problems like this from those who complained the loudest when we took the other one away. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 69612] 2.0.4 RC2/Sun provided bui ld calls home without asking
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69612 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 21 03:39:33 -0700 2006 --- Well, that didn't work too well - why can I not post hyperlinks in these issues? Anyway, in my haste, I copied the wrong issue, and now I can't change it? The bug I meant to refer to is 66990 - the one where input fields on forms are BROKEN, BROKEN, BROKEN. The first fields works fine, but from then on, you have to switch between mouse and keyboard for every one, which is more than just irritating for forms that have lots of fields on them. Anyway, I really hope that this gets fixed in 2.0.4, otherwise I'm going to have to revert 40+ machines to 2.0.2, and I am not relishing that thought. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 66990] Prompt position works bad in input fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66990 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 20 07:47:56 -0700 2006 --- Confirmed here too... This is a pretty inconvenient one too. I didn't catch this before upgrading about 40 computers over a weekend. Also, this still isn't fixed in 2.0.4rc2. Is this planned to be fixed in 2.0.4 final? If not, I'm going to have to roll some of our boxes back to 2.0.2 until it is fixed. Otherwise, many thanks for OOo - it has really saved us a lot of money in our small office! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
