[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 09:32:46 -0800 2006 --- Thanks, Eike. I could reproduce the problem. setDateTime(0.0) somehow makes jewish calendar invalid. I fixed a problem in initializing non-gregorian calendars in contructor, setDateTime seems another place has similar problem. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 User cn changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|REOPENED |NEW --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 27 02:31:52 -0700 2006 --- cn-khong: 1.) in the current cws I get the initial error: That means: Language: he, Country: IL, Variant: IL, Name: jewish xCalender.setValue(CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH, 2); short set = xCalneder.getValue(CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH); = failed for MONTH expected 2 gained 1 2.) isValid(): in the past the test code works. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Target milestone|OOo 2.1 |OOo 2.x
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 27 10:24:07 -0700
2006 ---
As communicated with 'cn' and 'sba' we'll remove this issue from CWS
i18n27. The related overall code changes to the calendar source file are
very small and effectively only remove a possible unwanted side effect.
However, there is some yet unidentified behavior to be investigated for
the Jewish calendar. The testcase script portion of method _setValue()
short[] fields = new short[]{CalendarFieldIndex.DAY_OF_MONTH,
CalendarFieldIndex.HOUR,
CalendarFieldIndex.MINUTE,
CalendarFieldIndex.SECOND,
CalendarFieldIndex.MILLISECOND,
CalendarFieldIndex.YEAR,
CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH
};
for (int k=0; kfields.length;k++) {
//log.println(Setting: + names[k]+ to + valueSet[k]);
oObj.setDateTime(0.0);
short set = oObj.getValue(fields[k]);
if (fields[k] == CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH) set = newValue;
oObj.setValue(fields[k],set);
short get = oObj.getValue(fields[k]);
if (get != set) {
error += failed for +names[k]+ expected +
set+ gained +get+ ; ;
}
}
with newValue==2 leads to the condition (get != set) being fulfilled,
which is strange enough.
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 06:48:42 -0700 2006 --- cn-khong: in the current i18n27 version the initial issue occure again. And as a result of this the getValue() and isValid() methods failed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 User sba changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 08:32:23 -0700 2006 --- SBA: Set status back to NEW. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 09:04:35 -0700 2006 --- khong-cn, I have run your test on m186 without my fix for this issue, it got exact same same error, what do you mean it occured again? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 11:12:01 -0700
2006 ---
khong-cn, I made wrong assumption of the test case _isValid().
The calendar is loaded, it is Arabic hijri calendar in this case.
The problem is the case set MONTH to 37 first, which makes the calendar invalid.
During calculation for hijri calendar, other fields, like day, year, are also
re-calculated, and may contain invalid values, just resetting MONTH to 10 in
next statement may not make the calendar valid.
The calendar should be recovered between two test statements.
public void _isValid() {
boolean res = true;
oObj.setValue(CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH, (short) 37);
res = !oObj.isValid();
new= oObj.setDateTime(aOriginalDTime);
oObj.setValue(CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH, (short) 10);
res = oObj.isValid();
tRes.tested(isValid(), res);
}
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 11:45:58 -0700 2006 --- BTW, when creating or loading a new calendar, the calendar is not initialized to 0, but today's date. getValue without setValue will get today's date, like 9 for this month Oct for CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH, not newValue (0) as you expected in the case _getValue(). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 User cn changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|cn|khong --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 10:19:44 -0700 2006 --- cn-khong: the following methods does not work: getValue() - PASSED.FAILED isValid() - PASSED.FAILED - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 15:35:37 -0700
2006 ---
khong-cn, I have modified your test cases in _XCalendar.java, and the test is
passed.
public void _getValue() {
boolean res = true;
requiredMethod(setValue());
new=oObj.setValue(CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH, newValue);
short aValue = oObj.getValue(CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH);
res = (aValue == newValue);
tRes.tested(getValue(), res);
}
newValue needs to be set before you can get it, requiredMethod(serValue())
seems not doing right thing.
public void _isValid() {
boolean res = true;
new= oObj.loadDefaultCalendar(installed_locales[0]);
oObj.setValue(CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH, (short) 37);
res = !oObj.isValid();
oObj.setValue(CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH, (short) 10);
res = oObj.isValid();
tRes.tested(isValid(), res);
}
It looks like calendar is not loaded in this case, only set one field will not
make calendar valid.
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 User khong changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 20 00:56:13 -0700 2006 --- Fixed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 User khong changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|khong |cn --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 20 01:22:09 -0700 2006 --- Hi Christoph, I have fixed the problem and rebuilt install set. Please try again. Thanks, Karl. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 User cn changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 08:06:28 -0700 2006 --- while executing the test the office crashes - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 User cn changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|cn|khong Status|REOPENED |NEW --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 19 08:07:16 -0700 2006 --- office crashes in i18n27 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 User khong changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|khong |cn --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 13 09:25:16 -0700 2006 --- ready for QA. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 10 14:44:37 -0700 2006 --- fixed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 User khong changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 10 14:45:31 -0700 2006 --- . - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 68819] API: i18n.CalendarImpl::co m::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 Issue #|68819 Summary|API: i18n.CalendarImpl::com::sun::star::i18n::XCalenda |r Component|api Version|680m181 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|NEW Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|khong Reported by|cn --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 02:34:28 -0700 2006 --- while running and enhancing the UNO-API-Tests for StarOffice I stumble over a problem: Language: he, Country: IL, Variant: IL, Name: jewish xCalender.setValue(CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH, 2); short set = xCalneder.getValue(CalendarFieldIndex.MONTH); = failed for MONTH expected 2 gained 1 To reproduce this behavior just start your office with parameter -accept=socket,host=0,port=8100;urp; and call inside a solar shell: checkapi -o i18n.CalendarImpl::com::sun::star::i18n::XCalendar Note: since the childworkspace qadev27 is not integrated please use this cws to execute the test. I have enhanced the test to display the failure. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
