[framework-issues] [Issue 54155] python : g_exportedScript s interpreted within commented line
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54155 User jbu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 11 14:12:55 -0800 2006 --- fixed on cws_src680_pyunofixes2. Fixed it by checking for a linefeed at the end of the code. I can't use execfile, because the module might not be reachable via a systempath (e.g. when the module is stored in a document). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 54155] python : g_exportedScript s interpreted within commented line
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54155 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 10 04:15:52 -0800 2005 --- IMHO, this should be fixed by using the execfile statement in pythonloader.py script insead of the exec one. David - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 54155] python : g_exportedScript s interpreted within commented line
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54155 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 6 05:23:55 -0800 2005 --- Hi, seems to me to be a bug (or a strange behaviour) in python itself. I use the python exec statement, e.g. start python and do the following -- Python 2.3.4 (#53, Jul 2 2004, 22:10:14) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. exec 'def f():\n\tpass\n#' Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in ? File string, line 3 # ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax exec 'def f():\n\tpass\n#\n' - The syntax error is not given, when you import such a file, so python sadly does something more than just evaluating the code :-(. I think, I will work around this by adding a line feed when the code does not end with one. Joerg - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 54155] python : g_exportedScript s interpreted within commented line
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54155 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 6 11:57:38 -0800 2005 --- Strange error, indeed. It does not happen with a string containing a simple assignment. No need to test the string, adding systematically \n to the string will go around the bug... Bernard - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 54155] python : g_exportedScript s interpreted within commented line
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54155 User npower changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|npower|jbu --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 04:17:34 -0700 2005 --- reassign - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 54155] python : g_exportedScript s interpreted within commented line
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54155 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 05:21:01 -0700 2005 --- Still reproduced on 1.9.130 Note that if the commented-out g_exportedScripts line is followed by at least one blank line there is no error, and the variable is interpreted although it is in a commented line ... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
