To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114479
                 Issue #|114479
                 Summary|Adjust handling of layer ID for groups of drawing obje
                        |cts
               Component|Drawing
                 Version|OOo 3.3 Beta 1
                Platform|All
                     URL|
              OS/Version|All
                  Status|NEW
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|DEFECT
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|code
             Assigned to|aw
             Reported by|od





------- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Mon Sep 13 13:06:55 +0000 
2010 -------
Follow-up of issue 113730:
<quote for AW's comment in issue 113730>
The better solution would be not to 'bend' the LayerIDs for groups, but
to define that groups cannot be invisible by their LayerID (which may not be
uniquely defined with more than one object). Their content will be checked on
single SdrObject level for visibility anyways. This would be two steps:

- Remove all 'bendings' of SdrGroupObj LayerIDs in SW
- Implement a ViewObjectContactOfGroup::isPrimitiveVisible which is the same as
ViewObjectContactOfSdrObj::isPrimitiveVisible but without the first test for
LayerID.
</quote>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to