[graphics-issues] [Issue 52845] Calc -- Chart versus Cha rt -- Calc

2005-08-19 Thread bm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52845





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 02:29:00 -0700 
2005 ---
As far as I understood your problems, you want to have the difference of the
current running date with the previous one as x-values, to get a chart in which
you can later read my times are pretty bad if I didn't run for two weeks, but
if a run every other day the time is quite good. Did I understand you correctly
so far?
You want every date printed, but where? On the axis there is usually only one
label per tick, do you want a feature to put more than one label at a tick? Or
do you want the dates in the chart area -- that is possible via Insert/Data 
Labels.
Btw., why do you need the actual dates in the chart? Do you want to have the
additional information about the time of the year, like in winter greater
breaks are worse than in summer?
Minimum, Maximum and Interval of grids can be set via the Scale tab-page of the
axis property dialogs (the axis scaling is identical to the grid scaling).

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[graphics-issues] [Issue 52845] Calc -- Chart versus Cha rt -- Calc

2005-08-19 Thread bm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52845





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 02:31:35 -0700 
2005 ---
... and furthermore: what do you mean by the Summary? Please set the summary to
a short ddescription of your problem, otherwise it is unclear what this issue is
about when being in a list of many issues.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[graphics-issues] [Issue 52845] Calc -- Chart versus Cha rt -- Calc

2005-08-19 Thread servdat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52845





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 04:09:51 -0700 
2005 ---
Before I answer some of the detailed questions of yours let me put the issue 
in the overall context. This example is just a hobby of mine and does not need 
to be solved with whatever circumventions and tricks. But all the same I think 
it is in its kind something that could be very handy in business - but only if 
you tackle the problem from the opposite side as I outlined in my block 
beginning with Imagine  (E.g. compare the effect and timeshift of 
promotion campaigns with sales results, compare the effect of promotion 
channels depending on the type of goods; etc etc). So it is in the first place 
an attempt to make you think about creating a graph module (standalone or as a 
part of your drawing application) that can be freely linked to Calc values as 
I described it.

Context details: I could have based on my numbers a lot of additional 
comparison possibilities. E.g. whether the curves are similar to each other 
(over different seasons) or if the pattern is changing; the effect of the 
proximity of the runs on the result (can also be negative if the recovery time 
is too short) or just the speed of decline due to my aging. As I also have 
intermediate times stored in my Calcs (e.g. for a flat piece and for an 
ascending one of the track) there are many more comparisons possible.

Details: the x-axis reflecting the dates in the year (or season) cannot be 
based on the actual dates but on the (additional column of) days elapsed since 
the beginning of the year (or season). So I get the correct spacing for every 
entry of running time in the appropriate column. But the text of the scale are 
these days the axis is based on (in a regular fashion: 20,40,60 etc) and not 
the dates - and these days have no meaning to a user. My idea that the actual 
dates of the table entries should be marked on the 0-line of the x-axis is 
just an ideal which can lead to unsolvable space problems especially when you 
combine different tables. What would come near to that ideal was an equally 
regular scale in a date format. But as the actual date column cannot be used 
as a useful axis base, a retranslation of our elapsed days in actual dates 
would even be more complicated. Facit: it could be a handy additional function 
to use calendar dates as a base for an axis to give the spacing.

Thanks and best regards
Bruno Naumann

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]