[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 User mav changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Nov 17 11:01:23 + 2010 --- Looks good in pl08. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 User cd changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|cd|mav --- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Mon Nov 15 09:11:12 + 2010 --- cd-mav: You are much more familiar with interaction handlers. Could you please verify this issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 User pl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|pl|cd --- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 15:34:56 + 2010 --- please verify in CWS pl08: the warning dialog uses now the XInteractionHandler2 interface (the same as the database does) which will make it not appear in API case. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 User pl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target milestone|OOo 3.x |OOo 3.4 --- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 1 15:41:06 + 2010 --- fixed in CWS pl08 (the interaction handler is now used to display the warnings dialog, which may be preempted by the user of a custom interaction handler). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from mmend...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 7 12:18:39 + 2010 --- I'm sorry for the long delay on my answer. We are not actually using the -headless flag. Instead of this, we are entering hidden mode when running the main OO basic macro which is being called from our java libraries. We are working that way as this looked the same (although we were probably wrong) and avoids the need to maintain a server startup/shutdown process control as OO is run when needed. What I don't know is if we can pass the flag when we are creating the desktop from Java, but... Anyway, I see thas issue 108490 has been recently fixed and confirmed so we would probably wait until 3.3 is delivered as this doesn't look to be included in 3.2.1. Then if you can give me some additional information or recomendation I would appreciate it. But, in any case, I think you can close that issue. Thank you very much for your help. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 User pl changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'cd' --- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 7 12:46:23 + 2010 --- Ok, I guess hidden mode means you're loading the document frame hidden (so it does not get shown. This way indeed you would get the warning dialog. I talked with cd (now on CC) and he said that this dialog should probably be part of an interaction handler (a framework feature that can override displaying any UI during load/save). So perhaps we have some canonical way I should have implemented this dialog but didn't - which would need to be fixed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from mmend...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 7 14:01:49 + 2010 --- May I open a new issue about Pdf dialog shown while loading the document frame hidden ? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 7 14:08:20 + 2010 --- Uh, we have this issue already ? We could perhaps change the title to pdf error dialog should optionally be not shown during export - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from mmend...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 28 08:55:11 + 2010 --- Hi pl I understand you but don't agree with this. If we set the warn about transparency on by default any time that the user selects PDF/A we could solve the problem you talk about. The user will receive the warning if he didn't force the warning supression and automated processes will work. About your second coment... I don't think this to be a good idea. IMHO applying your idea as a general rule, would force integrators to make an additional effort developing things outside OO which are already developed inside OO and which would require additional future maintenance. This goes against those which are making OpenOffice a way to make bussines which is, at the end, one of the elements which makes a product to be successful. Have in mind that, when integrators use OO for automation, OO runs usually in a headless machine and is the administrator who changes the OO options in order to change the automation behavior. If we would need to set everything from scratch instead of using what we can configure using the different configuration dialogs OO would be nearly unusable for automation as any future change would break the development investment... bFinally:/b I'm proposing the warning supression as an easy way to solve the problem, but don't forget that the real problem is that OO is reporting false positives about transparency when PDF/A is selected. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 28 09:06:27 + 2010 --- If the false positives are the real problem, those are a matter of issue 108490 which is fixed. So if that is your real problem, we apparently don't need a warning suppression at all ? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from mmend...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 28 10:29:33 + 2010 --- I'm not sure. This looks like this continues being a need. Let me explain: The case is that, using OO as a server, no user interface dialogs must be shown, as this would stop the server with no remote client notification. But I don't know what's better. Managing this kind of warnings dialog by dialog (as Im proposing here with the checkbox), or managing this at some higher level which could forbide or simply obbey user dialogs when OO is working on headless mode or, could be, considering a user dialog launching as an error when in headless mode... Of course, this looks that, for that case, the simplest way would be to implement the check box as the other options looks to be much more complex to implement, but... What do you think? What would be the best way to proceed with this? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 28 11:42:47 + 2010 --- In your server case you would run OOo in headless mode anyway, right ? If you pass -headless no dialog gets shown as they are immediately canceled. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 27 09:03:33 + 2010 --- On the contrary, that warning box should be shown to the interactive user always. It points to severe problem, namely that transparent PDF/A is a bad idea. All objects that were transparent and all objects that intersect them need to be output as one big image. Meaning you create a PDF/A document of bad quality. Therefore that warning should not be ignored. As for the idea of NOT using the filter options in an automated PDF/A creation: if you rely on what the user last clicked in the export dialog, you cannot even guarantee that you're exporting PDF/A. The set of export parameters can be considered completely random in that case. Actually I think we should do the export using the same constant set of default parameters if no dialog was shown, but changing that now would probably break someone's script. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 26 13:52:02 + 2010 --- *** Issue 65 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from mmend...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 26 16:01:42 + 2010 --- from pl Thu Apr 22 13:31:08 However a checkbox is not appropriate; if the user sees the export dialog, that is not an automated case anyway. Thats true, but the pdf export dialog is the best place to configure export option like warning or not during export. The currente OO release uses the options configured in that dialog as default options for any pdf export (automated or not). The usual way to automate processes it is to use as much as OO offers out of the box. When exporting to pdf, the easier way to specify the export configuration is to configure it using the dialog and, as OO reuses the latest configuration, it will run the automated pdf generation using the parameter selected in the user interface. Doing this configuring the filter requires some logic to configure export parameters which is already implemented in the configuration dialog, and could need some maintenance if configuration options change in the future. Doing this args(0).Name = FilterName args(0).Value = pdf doc.storeToUrl(url, args) Will store a pdf using the pdf export options selected in the user interface. If you implement the pdf export properties in the filter, then I need to implement another interface to edit pdf export properties or make something like configuration files to manage something already managed by OO. Implementing the check box is somthing useful for interactive users and automated processes too the same way we can select the pdf type or other parameters. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 User pl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Issue type|DEFECT|ENHANCEMENT Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.x --- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 22 13:31:08 + 2010 --- it's not really duplicate as 108490 is about cases where the error message should not appear in the first place. However a checkbox is not appropriate; if the user sees the export dialog, that is not an automated case anyway. I could image an extra property on the filter data you provide in an automated export case anyway (where you set PDF/A export in the first place). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 Issue #|111050 Summary|Impossible to automate PDF/A generation Component|gsl Version|OOO320m12 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|pl Reported by|mmendoza --- Additional comments from mmend...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 21 17:31:21 + 2010 --- This issue is related to #85195 The actual behavior when generating PDF/A produces a warning any time you try to export a document containing images to PDF/A. The final solution adopted in #85195 looks to be so arbitrary in my opinion. As a result of the applied solution, any time we paste a regular image on a writer document and try to generate PDF/A it generates a warning. I suppose that it is because OO manages the images with alpha chanel by default as I tried it with a .bmp .pdm .tiff linked (not embeded) images with the same result. The warning appears. I've been trying lots of combinations (image in frame, with or without background color, setting page background on and off, etc.) trying to generate a PDF/A file containing an image without warnings. That's impossible. This behaviour limits the automation capabilities of OO when we want to generate PDF/A documents in batch processing because the warning can't be deactivated and the dialog appears stopping OpenOffice when is being used as server. I would suggest to add a Show PDF/A warnings check box in the export pdf properties dialog in order to allow PDF/A batch generation disabling this checkbox. Thanks - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 111050] Impossible to automate PD F/A generation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Additional comments from mmend...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 21 17:46:03 + 2010 --- I've seen now that this issue probably duplicates #108490 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
