[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2011-02-10 Thread kso
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171


User kso changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Status|STARTED   |RESOLVED

  Resolution|  |WORKSFORME





--- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 10 12:35:07 + 
2011 ---
As the original report is about problems with dictionaries and this is solved
now, I consider this issue resolved.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2011-02-10 Thread kso
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171


User kso changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Status|RESOLVED  |CLOSED





--- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 10 12:35:33 + 
2011 ---
Closing.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2011-02-09 Thread kso
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171


User kso changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  CC|'colebantam,is,syzygy,volk|'colebantam,syzygy,volkerm
|erme' |e'

  Issue type|TASK  |DEFECT

Priority|P3|P4





--- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Wed Feb  9 16:31:02 + 
2011 ---
is: Isn't it so that nowadays (OOo 3.3) the abovementioned 3rd -- the shared --
layer is already available?

- settings deployed with bundled extensions define system settings
- settings deployed with shared extensions define settings, which overrule
systems settings for all users - without physically(!) overwriting the system
settings
- settings deployed with user extensions overrule bundled and shared settings

 Thus the solution for the problems mentioned above is not to overwrite settings
files in the office installation directory tree, but to deploy the settings in
question as shared extensions.

 Especially the problem with the dictionaries no longer should exist, as
dictionaries are extensions today.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2011-02-09 Thread is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171





--- Additional comments from i...@openoffice.org Wed Feb  9 17:06:40 + 
2011 ---
kso: Yes, for extensions we nowadays have this layering. So for dictionaries
this problem should no longer occur.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2010-06-10 Thread syzygy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171


User syzygy changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  CC|'colebantam,is,volkerme'  |'colebantam,is,syzygy,volk
|  |erme'





-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2008-12-10 Thread is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171


User is changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

Target milestone|OOo 3.1   |OOo Later





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 12:13:07 + 
2008 ---
New target again.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2007-11-26 Thread is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171


User is changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

Target milestone|OOo 2.x   |OOo 3.0





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 26 14:13:54 + 
2007 ---
Target OOo 3.0

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2006-10-11 Thread is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171


User is changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Status|NEW   |STARTED





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 11 03:24:59 -0700 
2006 ---
Accepted

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2006-06-27 Thread is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171


User is changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

Target milestone|OOo 3.0   |OOo 2.x





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 27 03:22:50 -0700 
2006 ---
Setting new target

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2006-01-26 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 03:32:21 -0800 
2006 ---
DicBack.cmd:
To correct an possible misunderstanding. DicBack.cmd was not intended as a 
solution to the problem, but as a quick'n dirty workaround. I wrote it for my 
friends and customers to simplify the update from 2.0 to 2.0.1, and decided 
afterwards that it might be useful for others to, and that for attached it to 
this thread.


Shared Layer:
This proposal of is is what I mentioned in the previous thread. I wrote that 
there should be a OO Folder in All Users\Application Data which contains the 
shared data. Of course is wrote it more detailed and from a more inside 
technical view ;-) I hope this new layer can be introduced without many other 
changes.
Nevertheless, if OOo gets a new layer, a converter would be fine...


Target:
I fear that targeting this issue to Version 3 is far to late! I think a 2.1 
Version Target would be much better. Also, I think that a solution for the 2.0.
x Series should be introduced. Of course it makes no sense to implement a merge 
system for every file that could be changed by users (as is said), but an 
simple switch (Don't update my Dictionarys) in the installer would solve the 
problem at first.



-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2006-01-24 Thread is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 24 03:22:45 -0800 
2006 ---
I think it would be fine to have an automatic update mechanism of files changed
by the user. But I also think, that we will not be able to offer this. We need a
merge/update mechanism for all files that could be changed by the user. And we
need this for all platforms. The attached batch file is a solution only for
dictinary.lst and only for Windows. Obviously xml files need a completely
different merge mechanism. And who knows? Tomorrow a new file is introduced,
that can be changed after the installation. Then again a new merge mechnism for
all platforms has to be implemented. This results in the problem that new files
are introduced by someone, without taking care of the update problem. Many
months later,  when the first update is available, we recognize the problem and
have to implement update/merge processes for this file  for all platforms. And
sometimes it can also be possible, that no update or merge is possible, for
example for customized pictures. No, I think this process will not work.
The only solution seems to be a new layer, which can be used to overwrite the
global settings made by the installation. But it cannot be allowed to change the
global settings made by the installation. So we have a user layer, that contains
the user specific settings. Then we need a new customization layer for settings
for all users. And then we have the global settings, that are available after
the installation. And this settings must not be changed, because all settings
are lost after update.  This seems to be a feasible scenario.



-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2005-12-18 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 06:43:30 -0800 
2005 ---
I wrote a small batchfile which reads the installation folder from the registry,
 and prompts the user afterwards if he wants to backup or restore the dic files.

It is written for german speacking users, but maybe someone wants to translate 
it into english ;-)

It may be usefull, as long as the update don't keep the installed dic's, which 
I fear will be the case for 2.0.1 at least...

Try to create a attachment...

I tested it only on XP, but should work on W2K to. Donst know for 9x...


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2005-12-18 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171


User colebantam changed the following:

  What|Old value |New value

   Attachment data|  |Created an attachment
  |  |(id=32518) Batch File for
  |  |saveing dic files





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 06:45:02 -0800 
2005 ---
Created an attachment (id=32518)
Batch File for saveing dic files


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2005-12-10 Thread andreschnabel
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171


User andreschnabel changed the following:

  What|Old value |New value

CC|''|'colebantam,volkerme'

  Keywords|  |regression





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 02:03:33 -0800 
2005 ---
setting regression keyword, as we were able to transfer those configuration data
wihtin 1.1.x codeline

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2005-12-10 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 10:53:27 -0800 
2005 ---
Danke Andre, warst schon wieder schneller ;-)

Soll ich das mit dem All USers/Anwendungsdaten Ordner hier nochmal schreiben, 
oder reicht der Verweis auf dem alten Thread?

MfG, Claus

*VOTE*


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]