[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c (german patterns)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 19 05:31:38 -0800 2006 --- they are from latex. so it is LPPL: The de patterns also didn't say they wewre based on LPPL ones, but only that tehy were based on the LateX ones withozt specifying anything concrete. Only after I filed this issue this got resolved (and yes, dehpyhn.tex says LPPL). I'd really not surpised if the other patters (which also *are* based on the TeX patterns are LPPLed, too. Anything else would wonder me). Plainly assuming that the converion author did something sensible is wrong, see the german example. But I can try to look at tetex' patterns. Not to mention some of those patterns in the source *do not have ANY* mention of any license - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c (german patterns)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 17 01:18:18 -0800 2006 --- is it only an assumption, that the dictionaries you mentioned are based on LPPL based stuff or is it a fact? There is no statement about this, so I have to assume that the copyright holders have done right to put their licenses on their work. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c (german patterns)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User mh changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 16 08:19:34 -0800 2006 --- rene, you need to be more precise for coming forward: for czech, I don't see a connection to LPPL, please explain, as well as for all the other rest. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c (german patterns)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 16 07:03:32 -0800 2006 --- well, de_DE is fixed. the rest (except hu_HU) has still serious problems. cs_CZ is GPL, the rest and it maybe too (didn't look) violates the LPPL etc. If we keep this issue for german only then it is fixed, yes, otherwise not. But please close this issue to get all the other illegal stuff/stuff with wrong license fixed - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c (german patterns)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 16 10:46:07 -0800 2006 --- hmm. must've confused something about cs_CZ. wrt the other ones the situation is clear. Read this issue: --- Additional comments from rene Fri Feb 10 05:11:40 -0800 2006 --- quick look at the ooo202dicts02 stuff: de_DE fixed. yes. cs_CZ contains no license info whatsoever except LGPL in makefile.mk... What are these patterns based on? same with da_DK, en_GB, en_US and ru_RU. it_IT only says LGPL without fullfilling the LPPL. hu_HU looks ok (Didn't look at hunhyph itself, though) nl_NL also says that it is based on the TeX patterns but not on which or doesn't ship the original file and therfore also violates the LPPL. Also read the LPPL, it says you have to clearly tell on what the file is based on (in which case absed on the tex patterns is too lax) or ship the original file, too... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c (german patterns)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User sba changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|sba |mh Status|REOPENED |NEW --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 13 02:53:19 -0800 2006 --- SBA-MH: As discussed, please take over. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c (german patterns)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User cloph changed the following: What|Old value |New value Summary|The licenses of hyph_*.dic|The licenses of hyph_*.dic | |(german patterns) --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 11 08:20:53 -0800 2006 --- And what is more, LPPL is incompatible with LGPL: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ Bullshit. (Sorry for the words). 1st of all, the licenses choose to release the work on a different license thatn LPPL, according to the LPPL (i.e. must meet documentation requirement and don't claim to be original work/don't act as direct replacement for original work) 2nd that page compares compatibility with *GPL*, not *L*GPL. Please don't confuse this. You don't need to generate a new wordlist and hyphenate that and generate a new one. You just take the LPPL one, modify it and release that modification under LGPL, with the required documentation stressed above. Again: Compatibility with GPL is useless comparison as OOo is LGPL Having a look whether you can integrate LPPL licensened stuff is futile as well, since you make that LPPL stuff LGPL. The only thing to consider is: What do you have to document to be able to release the modification of the LPPL stuff under LGPL. Having the de-pattern is is perfectly OK, since it is LGPL (= modified work released under a different License according to point 10a of LPPL) What was missing was the documentation required for this change to be allowed by LPPL, namely the points 6b 6d of LPPL. The documentation is now available, thus fixed for de. So yes, please keep this issue for de_DE only, but mark it fixed again. I'll change the summary. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|VERIFIED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 10 05:11:40 -0800 2006 --- quick look at the ooo202dicts02 stuff: de_DE fixed. yes. cs_CZ contains no license info whatsoever except LGPL in makefile.mk... What are these patterns based on? same with da_DK, en_GB, en_US and ru_RU. it_IT only says LGPL without fullfilling the LPPL. hu_HU looks ok (Didn't look at hunhyph itself, though) nl_NL also says that it is based on the TeX patterns but not on which or doesn't ship the original file and therfore also violates the LPPL. Two possibilities: Use other issues for the other ones and change the title of this one to cover de_DE only or reopen this one. I decide for the latter one since IMHO we should *not* ship LPPL-violating material. Maybe someone should point the LaTeX people to this issue... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 10 07:00:38 -0800 2006 --- Hi Rene, You are absolutely right. Unfortunatelly, I have misinterpreted this issue, because I have concentrated only the de_DE specific description. And what is more, LPPL is incompatible with LGPL: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ Now de_DE hyph. patterns are better in the source, becasuse hasn't already violated the LPPL, but, it is not enough. :( hu_HU is OK. The original, not extended Hungarian patterns (huhyphn) was licensed under GPL, but we (Hungarian NLP) got a permission from its author, Nagy Bence, to license the patterns under the LGPL, like Hungarian spell checking dictionaries. I believe, en_US, etc are not OK. Fortunatelly, we can solve _all_ LPPL license problem without removing the hyphenation patterns by an LGPLizing procedure: hyphenating unmunched spell checking dictionaries, and generating new patterns by patgen. Unfortunatelly, *now* (this month) I want to work for bread and butter, so any help are welcome. Also there is a problem for me (and investors of Hungarian StarOffice): We'd like to close CWS ooo202dicts02, because it is not only for solving hyph_de_DE license issue, so I will remove all hyphenation patterns (except Hungarian) temporarily, if you want solve this problem immediately. But, if these problematic hyphenation patterns have already been in OOo 2.0.1, I would rather ask time to solve this problem, targeted to 2.0.3, associated to a new issue. I suggest this issue let's be de_DE specific only, and reopened after 2.0.2. Thanks for your report. I apologize, Laci - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 10 09:09:10 -0800 2006 --- Help in hyphenation pattern licenses: http://offo.sourceforge.net/hyphenation/licenses.html cs_CZ license looks GPL. en_US hyphen.tex has (non LGPL compatible) TeX license. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User sba changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 07:29:21 -0800 2006 --- SBA: Verified in Linux Build of CWS ooo202dicts02. Note: The line about the license reads QUOTE License: GNU LGPL license. UNQUOTE MH told me this is OK. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User nemeth changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 8 03:08:58 -0800 2006 --- . - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User timar changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 8 10:43:07 -0800 2006 --- Laci, you did not update the de_DE/makefile.mk, therefore the README_hyph_de_DE.txt will not be packaged. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User nemeth changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 8 16:28:55 -0800 2006 --- nemeth-timar: de_DE/makefile.mk is OK. Thanks for the report! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User nemeth changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'cloph,khendricks,laurentg|'cloph,khendricks,laurentg |odard,rene,st'|odard,nemeth,rene,st' Assigned to|dnaber|sba --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 8 03:07:59 -0800 2006 --- Fixed in CWS ooo202dicts02, but we need a new issue for all integrated LPPLed hyphenation patterns to solve the problem of the missing and presumably incompatible licenses. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 4 03:32:21 -0800 2006 --- I cannot commit stuff so I'm not sure if it makes sense to have that issue assigned to me. Also, I don't have time to fix this for other languages. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 23:09:59 -0800 2006 --- and you know that the current file there is exactly what that stuff was based on or whether an older version was used? In the secpnd case, AFAIS, we have to ship *the old file* or tell which version it was baed on... Or when it gets updated that link also doesn't have real effect... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User dnaber changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment | |(id=33589) now refers to | |version number --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 10:59:30 -0800 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=33589) now refers to version number - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 11:02:31 -0800 2006 --- rene: and you know that the current file there is exactly what that stuff was based on: yes, I just checked that. I attached a new diff of the README that now includes the version number of the original file. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|mh|dnaber --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 12:43:56 -0800 2006 --- cool. I'll then reassign the issue to you and tell this issue plase when it's committed :-). Can you also verify/fix the other ones so that we finally can legally shipa ll the hyphs already in the source? (if you want...) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User dnaber changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment | |(id=33564) mention | |hyphenation files --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 16:51:54 -0800 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=33564) mention hyphenation files - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User dnaber changed the following: What|Old value |New value Issue type|DEFECT|PATCH Target milestone|--- |OOo 2.0.2 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 16:56:32 -0800 2006 --- I've attached a patch to the README that links the original file. With this patch, everything should be okay to my understanding. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 15:47:06 -0800 2006 --- hi folks! If this things are really illegal, then please remove them from the current project. I do currently not maintain anything on OOo (lost my cvs access-keys and data after a hd-crash some months ago) so it might be better if you could remove all the things from that part of the project. Sorry! hth marco - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value Priority|P2|P3 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 12:38:57 -0800 2006 --- aha. OK, so they still violate the LPPL. thanks for the heads-up. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 12:40:47 -0800 2006 --- must have overread the part which allows re-licensing... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User cloph changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'khendricks,rene,st' |'cloph,khendricks,rene,st' Keywords| |oooqa --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 12:27:07 -0800 2006 --- point a) Yes, one can take it and use LGPL for the modified ones. 10.a reads: A Derived Work may be distributed under a different license provided that license itself honors the conditions listed in Clause 6 above, in regard to the Work, though it does not have to honor the rest of the conditions in this license. point b) Yes, the dictionaries lack the documentation requirement. (point 6b 6d) 6 a) doesn't applie since the modification cannot be used as replacement for the original (format was changed, albeit slightly) 6c is already fulfilled. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 54505] The licenses of hyph_*.di c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value Priority|P3|P2 Summary|The license of|The licenses of hyph_*.dic |hyph_de_DE.dic| --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 6 12:09:05 -0800 2006 --- I see some problems here: a) can we really take a LPPLed work and make it a LGPLed work? Don't think so b) The LPPL says that you must tell where the original work is. Exactly, so that people don't need to search for it (or ship the orignal, too). Just telling from Latex is not enough iMHO, there are some versions of it... Changing subject since that also applied to en-US and tt_IT. where the it_IT at least correctly claims it is LPPL... Regards, Rene - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
