[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2007-05-29 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638


User cmc changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Status|RESOLVED  |CLOSED





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 29 19:53:05 + 
2007 ---
closing, out of date

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-14 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 00:12:04 -0700 
2005 ---
Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for discussing unrelated issues.

Please build without Java for now.


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-14 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638


User panbk changed the following:

  What|Old value |New value

Status|NEW   |RESOLVED

Resolution|  |FIXED





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 04:59:47 -0700 
2005 ---
Ok.

Anyway, turns out, I did not update to m133 correctly at first. Build seems to
have gone well beyond that point now.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-13 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 20:48:11 -0700 
2005 ---
pjanik, kendy! Having upgraded to m133 and applied the following patches on top
of that:

MD5 (openoffice.org2.0/64bit/buildfix-jdk150-jurt.diff) =
76412ca90b02d979bdd0db287098afc9
MD5 (openoffice.org2.0/64bit/buildfix-jdk150-scripting.diff) =
40775653b60fff7e8be77bedb730b365
MD5 (openoffice.org2.0/64bit/buildfix-jdk150-xmerge.diff) =
865e64aa3eac3cc755721b8ccec61f8f
MD5 (openoffice.org2.0/src680/xmlhelp-port-to-db-4.3.diff) =
a7a8197c2771f8d7344b843e8de23212
MD5 (openoffice.org2.0/src680/extensions-ldap-system-openldap-2.3.x.diff) =
1883428215ccafaa70d5b7ba574db0d3
MD5 (openoffice.org2.0/src680/fpicker-kde-service.diff) =
eb0a1551dccc288208009ed078a9453e
MD5 (openoffice.org2.0/src680/fpicker-kde-dialog.diff) =
646e9eebc771bce83ec5aac6698e50d3
MD5 (openoffice.org2.0/src680/fpicker-kde-partial-kio.diff) =
d6ca07909ef892cb7be39f75a7f5a43f
MD5 (openoffice.org2.0/src680/fpicker-kde-filter-name.diff) =
3efa8c15d3768c501fd9b57efa33fee6
MD5 (openoffice.org2.0/src680/cws-kaddrbook.diff) = 
9e92b20d8bea342670af509aa1ce59c7

I get the following error from regcomp:

[]
register component 'uuresolver.uno.so' in registry 'uno_services.rdb' succesful!
register component 'bridgetest.uno.so' in registry 'uno_services.rdb' succesful!
register component 'cppobj.uno.so' in registry 'uno_services.rdb' succesful!
register component 'uriproc.uno.so' in registry 'uno_services.rdb' succesful!
regcomp -register -br ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/uno_types.rdb -r
../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb \
-c javaloader.uno.so -c javavm.uno.so
register component 'javaloader.uno.so' in registry
'../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb' succesful!
register component 'javavm.uno.so' in registry
'../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb' succesful!
regcomp -register  -br ../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/bridgetest/bootstrap.rdb -r
../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb -c \
   
file:///meow/openoffice-mi/work/testtools/source/bridgetest/../../unxfbsd.pro/class/testComponent.jar
\
   
-env:URE_INTERNAL_JAVA_DIR=file:///meow/openoffice-mi/work/solver/680/unxfbsd.pro/bin
register component
'file:///meow/openoffice-mi/work/testtools/source/bridgetest/../../unxfbsd.pro/class/testComponent.jar'
in registry '../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb' failed!
error (RuntimeException): JNI exception occurred
using loader com.sun.star.loader.Java2
dmake:  Error code 1, while making '../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb'
dmake:  '../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/uno_services.rdb' removed.
'---* tg_merge.mk *---'

ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /testtools/source/bridgetest

Should I add some other patch? How to debug regcomp to figure out, what exactly
is the problem? Thanks!

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-09 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct  9 02:13:15 -0700 
2005 ---
panbk: please listen to the presentation of kendy from OooCon2005. There is
everything you need to know...


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-08 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct  7 22:51:56 -0700 
2005 ---
Oops, the `#endif' in patch-sal is extraneous. The patch should instead read: 
 
--- sal/rtl/source/macro.hxxThu Sep  8 12:03:00 2005 
+++ sal/rtl/source/macro.hxxThu Oct  6 02:24:38 2005 
@@ -61,5 +61,7 @@ 
 #endif 
 
 #if defined INTEL 
 #define THIS_ARCH x86 
+#elif defined(X86_64) || defined(__amd64__) 
+#define THIS_ARCH amd64 
 #elif defined POWERPC 
 

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-08 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638


User pjanik changed the following:

  What|Old value |New value

CC|''|'kendy,pjanik'

   Assigned to|mh|panbk

Ever confirmed|  |1

Status|UNCONFIRMED   |NEW





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct  8 01:03:26 -0700 
2005 ---
Hi,

first: thanks for taking care about AMD64 port!

Second: please update your source tree to m133 once it is read. It contains some
of the changes you proposed.

Kendy and me are working on the port. Kendy's patches are at
http://www.go-oo.org/patches/64bit/

Please try kendy's patches first.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-08 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct  8 06:54:49 -0700 
2005 ---
Wow. That's a lot of patches -- and many of them are quite old. Is there a good 
reason for them not to be in the main tree already? 

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638


User panbk changed the following:

  What|Old value |New value

   Attachment is patch|  |Created an attachment
  |  |(id=30224) Use sal_Size
  |  |(a.k.a. size_t) to specify
  |  |memory sizes





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct  7 22:28:00 -0700 
2005 ---
Created an attachment (id=30224)
Use sal_Size (a.k.a. size_t) to specify memory sizes


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638


User panbk changed the following:

  What|Old value |New value

   Attachment is patch|  |Created an attachment
  |  |(id=30225) Avoid compiler
  |  |error by making the
  |  |decision at compile-time





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct  7 22:29:25 -0700 
2005 ---
Created an attachment (id=30225)
Avoid compiler error by making the decision at compile-time


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638


User panbk changed the following:

  What|Old value |New value

   Attachment is patch|  |Created an attachment
  |  |(id=30226) Recognize the
  |  |AMD64 (X86_64) platform





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct  7 22:33:53 -0700 
2005 ---
Created an attachment (id=30226)
Recognize the AMD64 (X86_64) platform


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[porting-issues] [Issue 55638] sal_Size vs. sal_Int32

2005-10-07 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55638





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct  7 22:44:00 -0700 
2005 ---
One more little patch for amd64-recognition: 
 
--- jvmfwk/plugins/sunmajor/pluginlib/vendorbase.hxxWed Sep  7 15:33:05 
2005 
+++ jvmfwk/plugins/sunmajor/pluginlib/vendorbase.hxxThu Oct  6 03:37:45 
2005 
@@ -58,4 +58,6 @@ 
 #elif defined S390 
 #define JFW_PLUGIN_ARCH s390 
+#elif defined X86_64 
+#define JFW_PLUGIN_ARCH amd64 
 #else // SPARC, INTEL, POWERPC, MIPS 
 #error unknown plattform 
 

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]