[sw-issues] [Issue 52088] Alpha Index shows double e ntries w/o page ##
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52088 User es changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Tue Nov 23 14:34:57 + 2010 --- Verified in CWS os144. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 52088] Alpha Index shows double e ntries w/o page ##
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52088 User os changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|os|es --- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 18 10:01:03 + 2010 --- Reassigned for verification - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 52088] Alpha Index shows double e ntries w/o page ##
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52088 User os changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Platform|PC|All Resolution| |FIXED Target milestone|OOo 3.x |OOo 3.4 --- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 4 14:45:33 + 2010 --- Patch applied in cws os144 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 52088] Alpha Index shows double e ntries w/o page ##
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52088 --- Additional comments from scriptaman...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 25 20:41:20 + 2010 --- Hi, Some considerations about #52088 1. IMHO,It's a bug :-) 2. The Issue 104107 is a duplicate (sub-entry=key)? 3. Cambridge University Press vs. OpenOffice.org? ;-) Please, see page 3 of the following papers http://authornet.cambridge.org/information/productionguide/hss/XML_indexing_v2.pdf http://authornet.cambridge.org/information/productionguide/hss/Guide%20on%20Making%20an%20Index.pdf Kind regards D.L. --- Off topic --- Alphabetical index of OOo Writer unfortunately has more than a problem. The following are only some of the essential functions required for effective indexing. * Cross-referencing index entries (Issue 104691) * Formatting to specific entries (Issue 106199) * "Skips" footnotes/endnotes (Issue 32392) * More alphabetical index (Issue 6401) * Manual Page-range (Issue 94565) * Delete all index entries (Issue 20599) * etc... In some cases are only small changes, but that would increase greatly the capabilities of the index tools. These features are not optional. When you write an alphabetical index there are rules to follow. At least in the fields of law and humanities, a good index is essential! Might be a good idea to ask some advice to a professional indexer. The "our" competitor - MsWord - does not have these limitations (cf. Word97!). I'm convinced that improving the Indexing Tools - along with the bibliographic project (OOoBib) - OOo Writer could become an excellent word processor for scholars and technical writers. References. http://www.allegrotechindexing.com/articles.htm http://www.asindexing.org/site/Mauer_EmbeddedIndexing.pdf http://www.bayside-indexing.com/tools.pdf http://taxonomist.tripod.com/indexing/wordflags.html http://taxonomist.tripod.com/indexing/wordproblems.html http://www.stcwdc.org/PDF/indexing_oct01.pdf inter alia http://www.allegrotechindexing.com/indexingtools.pdf - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 52088] Alpha Index shows double e ntries w/o page ##
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52088 User os changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|ama |os Issue type|ENHANCEMENT |PATCH Target milestone|OOo Later |OOo 3.x --- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 12 09:54:21 + 2008 --- Target changed to 3.x, issue type changed to Patch, reassigned to me - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 52088] Alpha Index shows double e ntries w/o page ##
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52088 --- Additional comments from atom...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 12 09:28:46 + 2008 --- I just noticed this is marked ENHANCEMENT. It's actually a BUG. As I said in my comment, the entries are merged correctly if you define the index marks one way round, but not if you define them the other way round. The index marks should be treated the same regardless of which way round you define them so it's definitely a bug. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 52088] Alpha Index shows double e ntries w/o page ##
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52088 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 4 12:26:15 + 2008 --- This has been open for over three years and I even submitted a patch but there has been no activity since then. How do I get this fixed? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 52088] Alpha Index shows double e ntries w/o page ##
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52088 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 11 15:19:06 + 2007 --- I've attached a patch for this issue. The issue depends on which way round the index marks are. If you have an index mark with no key first, then use the text from that mark as the key for a second index mark all is well. However if you do it the other way round you get the duplicate entry. This is because SwTOXBaseSection::GetKeyRange won't find the existing entry for the primary key if it's a proper index entry rather than a dummy custom entry. This patch removes the condition that the existing entry be a custom entry fixing the problem. Sorry for not explaining it better - test it and you will see it works. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 52088] Alpha Index shows double e ntries w/o page ##
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52088 User atomice changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |48844) Patch for this issu | |e --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 11 15:14:56 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=48844) Patch for this issue - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 52088] Alpha Index shows double e ntries w/o page ##
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52088 User ama changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'os' |'fl,os' Target milestone|not determined|OOo Later --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 00:23:16 -0700 2006 --- Set target to OOo Later because it's not on our agenda at the moment. Added FL to cc to involve UserEx - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
